Validating Reward-related Biomarkers to Facilitate Development of New Treatments for Anhedonia and Reward Processing Deficits in Schizophrenia and Major Depressive Disorder
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Schizophrenia
- Sponsor
- Maastricht University
- Enrollment
- 160
- Locations
- 4
- Primary Endpoint
- Doors task outcome
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Deficits or abnormalities in reward processing are present in a number of psychiatric disorders. The overarching objective of the study is to conduct initial validation work towards optimising three experimental tasks - which have previously been shown to be sensitive to reward processing deficits - for future use in clinical trials.
This initial validation work has the primary objective to uncover group differences in task outcome measures between healthy control participants, participants with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and participants with schizophrenia (SZ) using statistical analyses. This may provide some indications for the use of these tasks as clinically-relevant biomarkers.
Primary aims include:
(i) comparing the investigator's endpoint means and distributions to those in previously published data; (ii) replication of previously-reported differences between MDD/SZ vs. healthy control participants, and, (iii) exploring the relationship between task endpoints and subjective participant- and clinician-rated report of reward-related constructs (e.g. anhedonia, negative symptoms).
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Doors task outcome
Time Frame: Day 1
"Feedback negativity", an event-related potential (ERP) at approximately 300ms after feedback presentation indicating a favourable versus unfavourable outcome in paradigms in which the participant loses or wins money.
Grip effort outcome
Time Frame: Day 1
Percentage of hard task choices at different reward levels
RL/WM task outcome
Time Frame: Day 1
Accuracy as function of set size (difficulty)