Detection of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus in Patients Referred For Cardioversion: Comparative Analysis of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transesophageal Echocardiogram
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 25
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Accuracy values for CMR Imaging for detection of LAA thrombus. (sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value)
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this study is to compare Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) Imaging with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in detecting the presence of LAA thrombi in men and women with atrial fibrillation presenting for cardioversion.
详细描述
The identification of left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus prior to cardioversion for patients with atrial fibrillation is crucial. LAA thrombus can be a frequent cause of cerebral stroke or peripheral embolism post cardioversion, and anticoagulation therapy is required in these instances to prevent cerebral events and avoid embolization. To date, TEE has been considered the clinical reference in detection of LAA thrombi with high diagnostic accuracy. However, diagnosis and size estimation of LAA thrombi remains challenging due to the complex anatomy of the LAA, and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is considered a semi-invasive procedure. To date, there have been few comparative studies involving TEE and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, and the results have been conflicting. With newer CMR Imaging techniques now available, we hypothesize that comparable results will be achieved in detecting LAA thrombus in subjects using a less invasive procedure.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Case Control
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •atrial fibrillation
排除标准
- •pacemakers
- •intracranial clips
- •intracranial stimulator devices
- •insulin pumps
- •intra ocular metal foreign bodies
- •cochlear implants
- •LAA amputation as part of CABG and/or valve surgery
- •GFR < 60 mL/min
结局指标
主要结局
Accuracy values for CMR Imaging for detection of LAA thrombus. (sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value)
时间窗: 24 hours
次要结局
未报告次要终点
