Safety Study of Totally Laparoscopic Resection With Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) for Rectosigmoid Cancer
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Interventions
- Procedure: Conventional laparoscopic surgeryProcedure: transrectal specimen extraction
- Registration Number
- NCT02635503
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic resection with natural orifice specimen extraction versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon or rectal cancer.
- Detailed Description
Further study details as provided by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 366
- 18 years < age < 80 years
- Tumor located in rectosigmoid (defined as 8- to 30-cm from the anal verge)
- Pathological rectosigmoid adenocarcinoma
- Preoperative T stage ranging from T1 to T4a according to the 7th Edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual
- Tumor size of 6 cm or less;
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score is 0-1
- American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score is Ⅰ-Ⅲ
- Informed consent
- Body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2
- Pregnant woman or lactating woman
- Severe mental disease
- Previous abdominal surgery
- Emergency operation due to complication (bleeding, perforation or obstruction) caused by colorectal cancer
- Requirement of simultaneous surgery for other disease
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Conventional laparoscopic surgery Conventional laparoscopic surgery Conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer will be performed for patients in this group. transrectal specimen extraction transrectal specimen extraction Laparoscopic colorectal resection with natural orifice specimen extraction will be performed for patients in this group.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Early morbidity rate 30 days The early morbidity rate is defined as the event observed during operation and within 30 days after surgery.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Duration of the intervention 1 day Duration of surgery.
Peritoneal bacterial contamination 1 day Peritoneal fluid samples were collected under sterile conditions at the end of the procedure and sent for gram stain as well as anaerobic, aerobic, and fungal cultures.We assess the contamination rate of peritoneal fluid in the two interventions.
Pain score 14 days Recording of the needed analgesia guided by pain score
3-year disease free survival rate 3 years A survival analysis will be performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, for which a comparison of the survival curve will also made using a Log-rank test.
5-year overall survival rate 5 years A survival analysis will be performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, for which a comparison of the survival curve will also made using a Log-rank test.
Plasma levels of several cytokines after colorectal cancer surgery 7 days We have measured and compared perioperative plasma levels of interleukin-2, interleukin-6, interleukin-8, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in the two group sample.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College
🇨🇳Beijing, Beijing, China