A Randomised Double-blind, Double-dummy Parallel Group Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Fluticasone Propionate / Formoterol Fumarate (Flutiform®) 500/20 µg BID and 250/10 µg BID Versus Salmeterol / Fluticasone (Seretide®) 50/500 µg BID in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Intervention
- Flutiform 500/20 µg BID
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Sponsor
- Mundipharma Research Limited
- Enrollment
- 923
- Primary Endpoint
- Average pre-dose FEV1
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 9 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether flutiform® is effective and safe in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Detailed Description
A multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, double dummy, active-controlled, parallel-group study in male and female subjects conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of flutiform in the treatment of COPD. Subjects will be randomised to one of three treatment groups in a 1:1:1 ratio. Throughout the study subjects will be assessed on a mixture of symptom based and lung function measurements to monitor their progress in the study.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Arms & Interventions
Flutiform 500/20 µg BID
Flutiform 250/10 (2 puffs BID)
Intervention: Flutiform 500/20 µg BID
Flutiform 250/10 µg BID
Flutiform 125/5 (2 puffs BID)
Intervention: Flutiform 250/10 µg BID
Seretide Accuhaler 50/500 µg BID
Seretide Accuhaler 50/500 (BID)
Intervention: Seretide Accuhaler 50/500 µg BID
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Average pre-dose FEV1
Time Frame: 26 weeks
Secondary Outcomes
- Average 1 hour Post dose FEV1, FVC, FEV6(26 Weeks)