MedPath

The Titan Versus Everolimus Intracoronary Stent (Xience V) in Diabetic Patients

Phase 4
Conditions
Diabetes Mellitus
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Interventions
Device: Titanium bare metal stent (Titan2®)
Device: Everolimus Drug Eluting Stent (Xience-V®)
Registration Number
NCT01510509
Lead Sponsor
Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina
Brief Summary

Even though the safety of drug eluting stents has been long established, in roughly 25% o patients their implantation is not considered, for specifically clinical reasons (chronic anticoagulation, bleeding, etc...), which make prolonged use of clopidogrel unsuitable. A considerable percentage of these patients have diabetes mellitus, a well known risk factor for stent thrombosis. Recently, the special characteristics of the titanium stent with nitric oxide have been described, causing it to be considered as a bioactive stent.

The TITANIC-XV trial was a prospective randomized multi-center active-treatment-controlled clinical trial, with the chief aim to evaluate clinical outcome after titanium bare metal stent (Titan2®, Hexacath, Paris, France) implantation as compared with everolimus drug eluting stent (Xience-V®, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California, USA) in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age over 18 years
  • Diabetes mellitus according to the World Health Organization Report
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention due to at least one significant de novo lesion (defined as at least 50% diameter stenosis by visual estimation) in a native coronary artery or coronary bypass graft.
  • Informed Consent "signed"
Exclusion Criteria
  • Inclusion in another clinical research protocol
  • Pregnancy
  • STEMI within 48 hours
  • Unprotected left main disease
  • Restenotic lesions
  • Stent diameter < 2,5 mm or > 3,5 mm
  • Stent length more than 28 mm in < 3 mm vessels
  • Chronic total occlusions
  • Allergy to aspirin, clopidogrel, heparin or abciximab
  • Active bleeding or a significant increase in bleeding risk
  • Significant renal insufficiency defined as creatinine > 2 mg/dl
  • Severely depressed LV function (EF≤35%)
  • Cardiogenic shock
  • Ischemic stroke within the last 6 months
  • Contraindication for DES
  • Disease with life expectancy < 12 months

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Titanium bare metal stentTitanium bare metal stent (Titan2®)Titanium bare metal stent (Titan2®, Hexacath, Paris, France)
Everolimus Drug Eluting StentEverolimus Drug Eluting Stent (Xience-V®)Xience-V®, Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California, USA
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Major adverse cardiac events

Comparison of major adverse cardiac events defined as death, non fatal myocardial infarction, brain stroke or new revascularization at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up between the two treatment strategies.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Late luminal loss

Comparison of late luminal loss within the in-segment zone at 9 months between the two treatment strategies in the subgroup of patients with angiographic follow-up.

Trial Locations

Locations (8)

Hospital Puerto Real de Cádiz

🇪🇸

Puerto Real, Cadiz, Spain

Hospital de Torrevieja

🇪🇸

Torrevieja, Alicante, Spain

Hospital Virgen de la Salud de Toledo

🇪🇸

Toledo, Spain

Heart Center, Satakunta Hospital, Pori, Finland

🇫🇮

Satakunta, Pori, Finland

Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina

🇪🇸

Badajoz, Spain

Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda

🇪🇸

Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain

Hospital Juan Ramón Jiménez de Huelva

🇪🇸

Huelva, Spain

Hospital General Universitario de Valencia

🇪🇸

Valencia, Spain

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath