MedPath

Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial 2

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Myopia
Registration Number
NCT00320593
Lead Sponsor
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to determine if progressive addition lenses (PALs) versus single vision lenses (SVLs) slow the progression of low myopia in children with poor accommodative responses (i.e., large accommodative lags) and near esophoria.

Detailed Description

Myopia is a significant public health problem that affects at least 34% of children in the United States and a much higher percentage in Asia. It is a predisposing factor for retinal detachment, myopic retinopathy, and glaucoma, thus contributing to loss of vision and blindness. As might be expected for such a prevalent condition, treatment costs are high. If interventions to retard myopia progression are successful, sight-threatening complications might be avoided and costs should be reduced.

The study has been designed as a simple trial that, other than the type of lenses being determined through the randomization process and the addition of accommodation testing using an autorefractor, largely approximates standard clinical practice.

Screening consists of non-cycloplegic procedures of subjective refraction, testing of oculomotor alignment, and testing of accommodative response using the Grand Seiko autorefractor.

Patients who appear to be eligible for the randomized trial will be tested with their eyes dilated to determine whether refractive error in each eye is within the eligibility range for the randomized trial. Patients will be randomized to either progressive addition lenses (PALs) with a +2.00 D addition or to single vision lenses (SVLs). Children will have three years of follow up, with visits every 6 months.

The primary outcome visit is timed 3 years from randomization, with the primary analysis being a comparison of the average change from baseline to 3 years in amount of myopia between children in the single-vision lens group and the children in the progressive-addition lens group. The primary outcome is change in spherical equivalent refractive error (SER) in diopters (D) as measured by cycloplegic autorefraction.

A separate ancillary study nested within the screening process will collect data on two additional methods of measuring accommodation, Monocular Estimate Method (MEM) retinoscopy and Nott retinoscopy. The aim of the ancillary study to help determine whether a simple, effective measure exists that can be easily used by clinicians to identify children with reduced accommodative response who, if they have low myopia and esophoria, might benefit from the treatment with PALs.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
118
Inclusion Criteria
  • Refractive error determined by cycloplegic autorefraction which meets all of the following:

    1. Spherical equivalent: -0.50 to -3.00 D in both eyes
    2. Astigmatism <= 1.5 D in both eyes
    3. Anisometropia <= 1.00 D difference between eyes in spherical equivalent
  • Visual acuity is at least 20/20 with best subjective refraction in both eyes

  • Accommodative response at near (33 cm) is less than 2.0D by non-cycloplegic autorefraction

  • Near esophoria (>= 2.0 PD) present by alternate prism and cover test (APCT) at near using best refractive correction determined from non-cycloplegic subjective refraction

Exclusion Criteria
  • Strabismus present by cover-uncover test at far, near, and/or near with +2.00D over best subjective refraction
  • Current or prior use of PALs, bifocals, or contact lenses in either eye (prior or current use of SVLs is allowed)

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years3 years

Measured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. For baseline and each time point, a SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction; the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis. Change was calculated as SE at baseline minus SE at 3 years. A negative value indicates that the myopia worsened; a positive value indicates that it improved.

Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 YearsBaseline to 3 years

Measured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. For baseline and each time point, a SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction; the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis. Change was calculated as SE at baseline minus SE at 3 years. A negative value indicates that the myopia worsened; a positive value indicates that it improved.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsBaseline to 3 years

Measured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. For baseline and 3 years, a SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction; the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis. Change was calculated as SE at baseline minus SE at 3 years. A negative value indicates that the myopia worsened; a positive value indicates that it improved.

Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 1 YearBaseline to 1 year

Measured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. For baseline and 1 year, a SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction; the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis. Change was calculated as SE at baseline minus SE at 1 year. A negative value indicates that the myopia worsened; a positive value indicates that it improved.

Distribution of Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 3 Years According to Baseline CharacteristicsBaseline to 3 years

Measured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. For baseline and 3 years, a SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction; the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis. Change was calculated as SE at baseline minus SE at 3 years. A negative value indicates that the myopia worsened; a positive value indicates that it improved.

Distribution of Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 3 Years3 years

Measured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. A SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction, and the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis.

Mean Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error at 3 Years3 years

Measured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. A SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction, and the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis.

Mean Change in Spherical Equivalent Refractive Error From Baseline to 2 YearsBaseline to 2 years

Measured in diopters (D) using cycloplegic refraction sphere (amount of myopia) and cylinder (amount of astigmatism at an angle (axis)). Spherical equivalent (SE) is defined as the sphere plus 1/2 the cylinder. For baseline and 2 years, a SE was calculated for each eye for each of the five trials of cycloplegic autorefraction; the median for each eye was averaged to obtain the SE used for analysis. Change was calculated as SE at baseline minus SE at 2 years. A negative value indicates that the myopia worsened; a positive value indicates that it improved.

Excellent Spectacle ComplianceBaseline to 3 years

Spectacle compliance was assessed on a five-point Likert scale: always, 5; often, 4; sometimes, 3; rarely, 2; and never, 1. Excellent compliance indicates that for the specified period (during school, after school, on weekends), spectacles were estimated at all visits to have been worn either always or often.

Trial Locations

Locations (8)

University of Alabama- Birmingham, School of Optometry

🇺🇸

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Southern California College of Optometry

🇺🇸

Fullerton, California, United States

Indiana School of Optometry

🇺🇸

Bloomington, Indiana, United States

New England College of Optometry

🇺🇸

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Ohio State University College of Optometry

🇺🇸

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Family Eye Group

🇺🇸

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States

Pennsylvania College of Optometry

🇺🇸

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

University of Houston College of Optometry

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

University of Alabama- Birmingham, School of Optometry
🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath