Disposable, transnasal versus conventional upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a diagnostic accuracy study in patients referred for diagnostic evaluation of the esophagus
Withdrawn
- Conditions
- esophageal lesions10017943
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON40705
- Lead Sponsor
- niversitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Withdrawn
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 147
Inclusion Criteria
- Indication for diagnostic upper endoscopy to evaluate esophageal disorders
- Age older than 18 years
- Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- Therapeutic endoscopic intervention
- Known bleeding diathesis
- Concurrent anticoagluation therapy
- History of trauma/surgery of nose or nasal cavity
- Recurrent epistaxis ( > 1 episode / 3 months)
- Altered anatomy of the upper gastroesophageal tract due to suergy of the esophagus
- Implantable pacing device
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational invasive
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>Diagnostic accuracy of the E.G.Scan 2.0 * compared to conventional upper<br /><br>endoscopy in patients referred for diagnostic upper endoscopy as determined by<br /><br>sensitivity and specificity for upper GI lesions</p><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>- technical success<br /><br>- safety<br /><br>- quality of procedure (evaluated by the endoscopist)<br /><br><br /><br>of the E.G.Scan 2.0 * compared to conventional upper endoscopy in patients<br /><br>referred for diagnostic upper endoscopy evaluate esophageal disorders</p><br>