Bi-level vs. Single Level ESB in VATS
- Conditions
- Acute Pain
- Interventions
- Procedure: Bi-level erector spinae blockProcedure: Single level erector spinae block
- Registration Number
- NCT05294315
- Lead Sponsor
- Lawson Health Research Institute
- Brief Summary
Video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is a minimally invasive surgery to remove lesions from the thoracic cavity. It is associated with moderate pain which can lead to pulmonary complications after surgery. The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons recommended a multimodal analgesia approach to manage pain after VATS. Erector spinae block (ESB) is a popular analgesic block due to its ease of performance and wide coverage. It has been shown to be effective in randomized control trials. Recently, case reports on bi-level ESB are emerging, suggesting more effective analgesia compared to single level ESB. As there is no available data, the investigators are interested in conducting a randomized pilot study, comparing bi-level to single level ESB to gather baseline data for sample size calculation for a formal randomized trial.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 90
- adult patients (at least 18 years old)
- elective unilateral wedge resection, segmentectomy, lobectomy or bilobectomy via VATS
- history of malignant hyperthermia
- BMI > 40, chronic pain condition
- Daily opioid consumption of more than 60 mg oral morphine equivalents
- Conversion to thoracotomy
- Insertion of epidural
- postoperative admission to ICU
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Bi-level block arm - Intervention Bi-level erector spinae block Bi-level erector spinae block at 4th and 6th transverse process Single level block arm - Control Single level erector spinae block Single level erector spinae block at 4th transverse process
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Opioid use in first 12 postoperaive hour First 12 hour from arriving at postoperative recovery
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Incidence of Delayed block complication - based on clinical assessment First 5 days paresthesia, motor weakness, hematoma, abscess
Pain score area under curve first 12 hour First 12 hour from arriving at postoperative recovery Numeric rating scale, 0 to 10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst possible pain
Incidence of Acute block complication - based on clinical assessment First 12 hour since block placement pneumothorax, local anesthetic toxicity, epidural spread, bleeding
Pain score area under curve first 24 hour First 24 hour from arriving at postoperative recovery Numeric rating scale, 0 to 10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst possible pain
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Cheng Lin
🇨🇦London, Ontario, Canada