Addiction Risk: The Influence of Mindset Induction on the Effect of a Brief Intervention to Reduce Alcohol Use
- Conditions
- Alcohol Drinking
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Experimental Mindset Induction
- Registration Number
- NCT03339687
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Konstanz
- Brief Summary
Brief Interventions (BI) based on Motivational Interviewing are effective to reduce alcohol use. In this study the investigators test the hypothesis that that an open Mindset increases the positive effects of BI.
Patients who are newly admitted to the psychotherapy outpatient clinic are routinely screened for risky alcohol use. All patients with risky alcohol use are eligible to the study and all receive the WHO's ASSIST-linked BI.
Participants receive a brief Mindset induction prior to receiving BI. They are are randomly assigned to either the induction of an open or a closed Mindset according to Gollwitzer.
The investigators measure the change in alcohol-related risk perception, treatment motivation and real alcohol drinking.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 66
- admitted to treatment at psychotherapy outpatient clinic
- alcohol use disorder
- substance use disorder
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Induction of a Closed Mindset Experimental Mindset Induction Psychological Intervention. Participants are asked to work on a brief paper-and-pencil task that has been shown to induce an Implemental Mindset according to the Mindset theory of action phases (Gollwitzer \& Keller (2016). Mindset Theory. In: V. Zeigler-Hill, T.K. Shackelford (eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. New York: Springer). Induction of Open Mindset Experimental Mindset Induction Psychological Intervention. Participants are asked to work on a brief paper-and-pencil task that has been shown to induce a Deliberative Mindset according to the Mindset theory of action phases (Gollwitzer \& Keller (2016). Mindset Theory. In: V. Zeigler-Hill, T.K. Shackelford (eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. New York: Springer).
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Individual Risk Perception The questionnaire assesses the variable related to the week before, i.e. time frame 1 week. The participant's self-reported risk of experiencing alcohol-related problems is measured with the self-report measure "Questionnaire for Alcohol-related Risk Perception" (German "Fragebogen zur Alkoholbezogenen Risikowahrnehmung", FAR; Klepper, Odenwald \& Rockstroh (2016). Risikowahrnehmung und Alkoholabhängigkeit. SUCHT, 62 (6), 374-382; DOI 10.1024/0939-5911/a000457).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Amount of alcohol drinking The interviewers assess the number of standard units of alcohol consumed during month before assessment, i.e. time-frame 1 month Self-reported amount of standard units of alcohol consumed by the individual
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Konstanz, Psychotherapy Outpatient Clinic
🇩🇪Konstanz, Germany