Hip Denervation and Intra-articular Hydration in Damaged Hip in Axial Spondyloarthritis Patients
- Conditions
- Patients With Axial SpA According to ASAS CriteriaPatients With Unilateral or Bilater Hip Damage According to BASRI ScoreAge > 18
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT05219084
- Lead Sponsor
- Sohag University
- Brief Summary
Background: The hip joint is frequently affected in axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) of adults with destructive effects in untreated patients. About 35% of axial SpA patients had either unilateral or bilateral hip arthritis. Destruction is more common with early-onset, active disease, or enthesitis.
Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of hip denervation (HD) and intra-articular hydration (IAH) on pain, function score, hip mobility scores in a cohort of axial SpA patients with grade 3 and 4 hip BASRI scores.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- age 18 or more
- Axial; SpA fulfilled ASA criteria
- BASRI score grade 3 or 4 for one hip at least
- patients younger than 18
- Axial; SpA with normal hip or hip involvement less than 3 on BASRI score
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Hip denervatiopn hip denervation Hip denervation with lidocaine 2% to each genicular branch, 2ml at each point compined group Combined group hip denervation and intra-articular hydration were conducted together in this group placebo group Control group 5ml of normal; saline-injected subcutaneously Inra-articular hydration intra-articular hydration 10 ml of normal saline injected inside the hip under ultrasound guidance
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Harris functional hip score Baseline, after 4 weeks and after 12 weeks Pain receives 44 points, function 47 points, range of motion 5 points, and deformity 4 points. Function is subdivided into activities of daily living (14 points) and gait (33 points).
The higher the HHS, the less dysfunction. A total score of \<70 is considered a poor result; 70-80 is considered fair, 80-90 is good, and 90-100 is an excellent resultChange in range of motion of the hip Baseline, after 4 weeks and after 12 weeks hip flexion, extension , internal; rotation , external; rotation , abduction , and adduction all were recopreded
Change in semiquantitative tenderness score Baseline, after 4 weeks and after 12 weeks a score from 0-3, 90 means no tenderness and 3 means maximum tenderness
Change in visual analogue scale Baseline , after 4 weeks and after 12 weeks 0 means no pain, 100 means the highest degree of pain
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Ahmed Elsaman
🇪🇬Sohag, Egypt