MedPath

A Study of Zasocitinib in Adults With Psoriatic Arthritis Who Have Not Taken Biologic Medicines

Phase 3
Recruiting
Conditions
Psoriatic Arthritis
Interventions
Drug: Active Comparator
Drug: Placebo
Registration Number
NCT06671483
Lead Sponsor
Takeda
Brief Summary

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the joints and skin in people who have psoriasis (PsO).

The main aim of the study is to know how well zasocitinib (TAK-279) works in participants with active PsA who have not previously been treated with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

The participants will be treated with either zasocitinib, active comparator, or placebo. Participants will be in the study for up to 60 weeks.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1088
Inclusion Criteria

Age:

  1. The participant is aged 18 years or older at the time of signing the informed consent form (ICF). In South Korea, the age requirement for adult participants is >=19 years of age.

    Disease Characteristics:

  2. The participant has had signs and symptoms consistent with PsA for at least 3 months.

  3. The participant meets the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR criteria).

  4. The participant has active arthritis as shown by a minimum of >=3 tender joints in TJC68 and >=3 swollen joints in SJC66 at the screening and baseline (Day 1) visits.

  5. The participant has at least 1 active lesion of plaque PsO >=2 cm in diameter, or any nail or nail bed changes characteristic of PsO.

    Medications for PsA:

  6. The participant has had at least one of the following:

    1. Inadequate response to a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), OR
    2. Inadequate response to a conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD).
Exclusion Criteria

PsA and PsO:

  1. The participant has other disease(s) that might confound the evaluations of benefit of zasocitinib therapy, including but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Lyme disease, gout, or fibromyalgia.
  2. The participant has a concomitant comorbid skin condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the study assessments, such as evidence of non-plaque PsO (erythrodermic, pustular, predominately guttate PsO, inverse, or drug-induced PsO).

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Zasocitinib Dose BZasocitinibParticipants will receive zasocitinib Dose B, tablets, orally, QD for up to Week 52.
Placebo + ZasoctinibZasocitinibParticipants will receive placebo, orally, QD for up to Week 16, followed by zasoctinib Dose A or Dose B, orally, QD, from Week 16 up to Week 52.
Zasocitinib Dose AZasocitinibParticipants will receive zasocitinib Dose A, tablets, orally, once daily (QD) for up to Week 52.
Active Comparator Dose CActive ComparatorParticipants will receive active comparator Dose C, capsules, orally, twice daily (BID) for up to Week 52.
Placebo + ZasoctinibPlaceboParticipants will receive placebo, orally, QD for up to Week 16, followed by zasoctinib Dose A or Dose B, orally, QD, from Week 16 up to Week 52.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboAt Week 16

ACR responses are the numerical measurement of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. It is a composite clinical outcome assessment (COA) measure that includes both clinician-reported outcome assessments (ClinROs) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). An ACR20 response is defined as: greater than or equal to (\>=) 20 percent (%) improvement from baseline in both swollen joint count 66 joints (SJC66) and tender joint count 68 joints (TJC68), and \>=20% improvement from baseline in 3 of the following 5 assessments: Patient's global assessment (PtGA) of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) pain; PtGA of PsA; physician's global assessment of disease activity (PGA) of PsA; participant's assessment of physical function as measured by health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI); high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). Percentage of participants achieving ACR20 response at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Participants Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboAt Week 16

The MDA is defined as a composite outcome measure of 7 ClinROs and PROs used in PsA. Participants are classified as achieving MDA if they fulfil 5 of 7 outcome measures: TJC68 less than or equal to (\<=) 1, SJC66 \<=1, psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score \<=1 or body surface area (BSA) affected by psoriasis \<=3%, PtGA of PsA Pain score \<=15, PtGA of PsA score \<=20, HAQ-DI \<=0.5, and Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) \<=1. Percentage of participants achieving MDA at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI-75 Response (in Participants With a Baseline >=3% BSA) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboBaseline, at Week 16

A PASI-75 response is defined as \>=75% improvement in the PASI score from baseline. It is a ClinRO used to measure psoriasis severity, combining the percent of affected skin surface area with the severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation across four body regions: head, upper extremities, trunk, and lower extremities. Severity is scored on a 0-4 scale, with 0 indicating no involvement and 4 indicating very marked involvement. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with \<=3 representing mild disease, \>=3 to 15 representing moderate disease, and \>=15 indicating severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving PASI-75 response (in participants with a baseline \>=3% body surface area \[BSA\]) for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo at Week 16 will be reported.

Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR50 Response at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboAt Week 16

ACR responses are the numerical measurement of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. It is a composite COA measure that includes both ClinROs and PROs. An ACR50 response is defined as: \>= 50% improvement from baseline in both SJC66 and TJC68, and \>=50% improvement from baseline in 3 of the following 5 assessments: PtGA of PsA pain; PtGA of PsA; PGA of PsA; participant's assessment of physical function as measured by HAQ-DI; hsCRP. Percentage of participants achieving ACR50 response at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

Change From Baseline in the HAQ-DI Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboBaseline, at Week 16

The HAQ-DI is defined as a 20-item PRO measure used to assess functional ability over the past week across 8 categories: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common daily activities. For each of these categories, participant reports the amount of difficulty they have in performing 2 or 3 specific activities on a 4-point scale (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, 3 = unable to do) The use of assistive devices and personal assistance are also noted. The HAQ-DI score is calculated as the mean of the category scores (0 = no disability, 3 = completely disabled), with 0 being the most desirable outcome and 3 as the least desirable. Participants must have scores for at least 6 categories for the HAQ-DI to be computed. Change from baseline in the HAQ-DI score at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR70 Response at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboAt Week 16

ACR responses are the numerical measurement of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. It is a composite COA measure that includes both ClinROs and PROs. An ACR70 response is defined as: \>=70% improvement from baseline in both SJC66 and TJC68, and \>=70% improvement from baseline in 3 of the following 5 assessments: PtGA of PsA pain; PtGA of PsA; PGA of PsA; participant's assessment of physical function as measured by HAQ-DI; hsCRP. Percentage of participants achieving ACR70 response at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

Change From Baseline in the Short Form-36 Health Survey Version 2.0 (SF-36 v2.0) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A Compared to PlaceboBaseline, at Week 16

The SF-36 v2.0 is defined as a self-administered, validated questionnaire designed to measure general health-related quality of life (QoL). This 36-item questionnaire measures 8 domains over the past 4 weeks, including physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health, physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. Summary score PCS, will be calculated ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate better QoL. Change from baseline in the SF-36 v2.0 PCS score at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A compared to placebo will be reported.

Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)- Fatigue Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A Compared to PlaceboBaseline, at Week 16

The FACIT-fatigue score is defined as a 13-item PRO measure that assesses the severity of self-reported fatigue and its impact on daily functioning over the past 7 days. It includes items measuring tiredness, weakness, listlessness, lack of energy, and the effects on activities such as sleep and social interactions. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale (0 = not at all; 1 = a little bit; 2 = somewhat; 3 = quite a bit; 4 = very much). The total score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue. Change from baseline in the FACIT- fatigue score at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A compared to placebo will be reported.

Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR20 Response at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Active ComparatorAt Week 16

ACR responses are the numerical measurement of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. It is a composite COA measure that includes both ClinROs and PROs. An ACR20 response is defined as: \>= 20% improvement from baseline in both SJC66 and TJC68, and \>=20% improvement from baseline in 3 of the following 5 assessments: PtGA of PsA pain; PtGA of PsA; PGA of PsA; participant's assessment of physical function as measured by HAQ-DI; hsCRP. Percentage of participants achieving ACR20 response of at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to active comparator will be reported.

Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI-75 Response (in Participants With a Baseline >=3% BSA) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A compared to Active ComparatorBaseline, at Week 16

A PASI-75 response is defined as \>=75% improvement in the PASI score from baseline. It is a ClinRO used to measure psoriasis severity, combining the percent of affected skin surface area with the severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation across four body regions: head, upper extremities, trunk, and lower extremities. Severity is scored on a 0-4 scale, with 0 indicating no involvement and 4 indicating very marked involvement. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with \<=3 representing mild disease, \>=3 to 15 representing moderate disease, and \>=15 indicating severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving PASI-75 response (in participants with a baseline \>=3% BSA) for zasocitinib Dose A compared to active comparator at Week 16 will be reported.

Percentage of Participants Achieving LEI =0 (in Participants With a Baseline LEI >=1) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboBaseline, at Week 16

The LEI is defined as a 6-item ClinRO measure specifically developed for PsA. It assesses the presence or absence of pain/tenderness when 4 kilograms per centimeter square (kg/cm\^2) of pressure is applied to 6 enthesial sites: the lateral epicondyles, medial femoral condyles, and Achilles tendon insertions on both sides of the body. Tenderness at each site is recorded on a dichotomous scale (0 = non-tender, 1 = tender). The total score is the sum of tender sites, ranging from 0 to 6, with a higher score indicating a greater enthesitis burden. Percentage of participants achieving LEI =0 (in participants with a baseline LEI \>=1) at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

Change From Baseline in Individual Components of ACR Response at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboBaseline, at Week 16

ACR responses are the numerical measurement of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. It is a composite COA measure that includes both ClinROs and PROs. An ACR response is defined as: improvement from baseline in both SJC66 and TJC68, and improvement from baseline in 3 of the following 5 assessments: PtGA of PsA pain (0-100 visual analogue scale \[VAS\]); PtGA of PsA (0-100 VAS); PGA of PsA (0-100 VAS); participant's assessment of physical function as measured by HAQ-DI (0-3 scale); hsCRP. Change from baseline in individual components of ACR response at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

Percentage of Participants Achieving Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) =0 (in Participants With a Baseline LDI >=1) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboBaseline, at Week 16

The LDI is defined as a ClinRO measure use to assess the presence of dactylitis. It involves measuring the circumference of all 20 digits using a dactylometer, with measurements taken around the proximal phalanx as close to the web space as possible. Moderate pressure is applied to assess tenderness or pain in the affected digits. Tenderness is scored on a binary scale (0 = non-tender, 1 = tender). Only digits with a circumference ratio exceeding 10% are considered to have dactylitis. A higher score indicates worse dactylitis. Percentage of participants achieving LDI =0 (in participants with a baseline LDI \>=1) at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI-75 Response (in Participants With a Baseline >=3% BSA) at Week 8 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboBaseline, at Week 8

A PASI-75 response is defined as \>=75% improvement in the PASI score from baseline. It is a ClinRO used to measure psoriasis severity, combining the percent of affected skin surface area with the severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation across four body regions: head, upper extremities, trunk, and lower extremities. Severity is scored on a 0-4 scale, with 0 indicating no involvement and 4 indicating very marked involvement. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with \<=3 representing mild disease, \>=3 to 15 representing moderate disease, and \>=15 indicating severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving PASI-75 response (in participants with a baseline \>=3% BSA) at Week 8 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI-90 Response (in Participants With a Baseline >=3% BSA) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboBaseline, at Week 16

A PASI-90 response is defined as \>=90% improvement in the PASI score from baseline. It is a ClinRO used to measure psoriasis severity, combining the percent of affected skin surface area with the severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation across four body regions: head, upper extremities, trunk, and lower extremities. Severity is scored on a 0-4 scale, with 0 indicating no involvement and 4 indicating very marked involvement. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with \<=3 representing mild disease, \>=3 to 15 representing moderate disease, and \>=15 indicating severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving PASI-90 response (in participants with a baseline \>=3% BSA) at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI-100 Response (in Participants With a Baseline >=3% BSA) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboBaseline, at Week 16

A PASI-100 response is defined as \>=100% improvement in the PASI score from baseline. It is a ClinRO used to measure psoriasis severity, combining the percent of affected skin surface area with the severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation across four body regions: head, upper extremities, trunk, and lower extremities. Severity is scored on a 0-4 scale, with 0 indicating no involvement and 4 indicating very marked involvement. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with \<=3 representing mild disease, \>=3 to 15 representing moderate disease, and \>=15 indicating severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving PASI-100 response (in participants with a baseline \>=3% BSA) at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR50 and PASI-100 Response (in Participants With a Baseline >=3% BSA) Simultaneously at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboBaseline, at Week 16

ACR responses measure improvement in multiple criteria, a composite COA with ClinROs and PROs. An ACR50 response is \>=50% improvement in SJC66 and TJC68, and 3 of 5 assessments: PtGA of PsA pain; PtGA of PsA; PGA of PsA, HAQ-DI, hsCRP. A PASI-100 response is \>=100% improvement in the PASI score from baseline. It's a ClinRO measuring psoriasis severity, combining the percent of affected skin surface area with the severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation across four body regions: head, upper extremities, trunk, and lower extremities. Severity is scored from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (very marked involvement). PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with \<=3 as mild, \>=3 to 15 as moderate, and \>=15 as severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving ACR50 and PASI-100 response (in participants with a baseline \>=3% BSA) simultaneously at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

Percentage of Participants Achieving sPGA Response of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With >=2-Point Decrease From Baseline (in Participants With a Baseline sPGA >=2) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboBaseline, at Week 16

Static physician's global assessment (sPGA) is defined as a 5-point ClinRO measure used to assess the current state of psoriasis based on severity of erythema, induration, and scaling. The total sPGA score ranges from 0 to 4, where 0 = clear, 1 = almost clear, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity. Each lesion characteristic (erythema, induration, and scaling) is graded separately on a 5-point scale: erythema (0 = no evidence to 4 = bright red coloration), induration (0 = no evidence to 4 = severe plaque elevation), and scaling (0 = no evidence to 4 = thick scaling). Lesion scores for erythema, induration, and scaling are averaged and rounded to nearest whole number to compute total score. Percentage of participants achieving sPGA response of clear (0) or almost clear (1) with \>=2-point decrease from baseline (in participants with a baseline sPGA \>=2) at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

Percentage of Responders Achieving Minimal Clinically Important Differences (Reduction of >=0.35 From Baseline) in HAQ-DI Score From Baseline at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboBaseline, at Week 16

The HAQ-DI is defined as a 20-item PRO measure used to assess functional ability over the past week across 8 categories: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common daily activities. Each category includes 2-3 activities rated on a 4-point scale (0 = without any difficulty, 1 = with some difficulty, 2 = with much difficulty, 3 = unable to do). Assistive devices and personal assistance are also noted. The HAQ-DI score is calculated as the mean of the category scores (0 = no disability, 3 = completely disabled), with scores of 0-1 indicating mild-to-moderate disability, 1-2 moderate-to-severe, and 2-3 severe-to-very severe disability. Participants must have scores for at least 6 categories for the HAQ-DI to be computed. Percentage of responders achieving minimal clinically important differences (reduction of \>=0.35 from baseline) in HAQ-DI score from baseline at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

Change From Baseline in the SF-36 v2.0 Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboBaseline, at Week 16

The SF-36 v2.0 is defined as a self-administered, validated questionnaire designed to measure general health-related quality of life (QoL). This 36-item questionnaire measures 8 domains over the past 4 weeks, including physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health, physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. Summary score MCS, will be calculated ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate better QoL. Change from baseline in the SF-36 v2.0 MCS score at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

Change From Baseline in Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease-12 Items (PsAID-12) Total Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboBaseline, at Week 16

The PsAID-12 is defined as a 12-item PRO measure that assesses symptoms such as pain, fatigue, and skin problems and the impact of PsA on the participant's life over the past week. It covers areas including work and/or leisure activities, physical activities, sleep, anxiety, embarrassment or shame, social participation, and depression. The response options are rated on a numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0 (none/no difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), with higher scores indicating a greater impact of the disease. Change from baseline in PsAID-12 total score at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboBaseline, at Week 16

The DAPSA is defined as a composite measure of peripheral joint disease activity that includes ClinROs, PROs, and a laboratory test. DAPSA is calculated as the sum of the following components: tender joint count (0-68), swollen joint count (0-66), hsCRP level (milligrams per deciliter \[mg/dL\]), PtGA of PsA pain (0-100 VAS), and PtGA of PsA (0-100 VAS). DAPSA cutoffs for disease activity are: remission (\<=4), low disease activity (\>4 to \<=14), moderate disease activity (\>14 to \<=28), and high disease activity (\>28). Change from baseline in DAPSA score at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) (C-Reactive Protein) Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboBaseline, at Week 16

The DAS28 with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein is defined as a derived index combining the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), hsCRP, and PtGA of PsA. The 28-joint count includes the shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) 1-5, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) 1-5 of both upper extremities, and the knee joints of both lower extremities. The DAS28 score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Change from baseline in DAS28 C-reactive protein score at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Fingernail Psoriasis (PGA-F) Score in Participants With Psoriatic Nail Involvement (PGA-F Greater than [>] 0) From Baseline at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to PlaceboBaseline, at Week 16

The PGA-F is defined as a ClinRO measure assessing the severity of fingernail PsO. It evaluates nail bed signs (onycholysis, hyperkeratosis, erythema, splinter hemorrhages) and nail matrix signs (pitting, ridging, discoloration). Clinicians rate the severity using categories: clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), and severe (4). The total score is based on the area with the most involvement (nail bed or matrix), ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (very severe), with higher scores indicating more severe fingernail PsO. Change from baseline in PGA-F score in participants with PGA-F \>0 from baseline at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to placebo will be reported.

Change From Baseline in the SF-36 v2.0 PCS Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose B Compared to PlaceboBaseline, at Week 16

The SF-36 v2.0 is defined as a self-administered, validated questionnaire designed to measure general health-related quality of life (QoL). This 36-item questionnaire measures 8 domains over the past 4 weeks, including physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health, physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. Summary score PCS, will be calculated ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicate better QoL. Change from baseline in the SF-36 v2.0 PCS score at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose B compared to placebo will be reported.

Change From Baseline in the FACIT- Fatigue Score at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose B Compared to PlaceboBaseline, at Week 16

The FACIT-fatigue score is defined as a 13-item PRO measure that assesses the severity of self-reported fatigue and its impact on daily functioning over the past 7 days. It includes items measuring tiredness, weakness, listlessness, lack of energy, and the effects on activities such as sleep and social interactions. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale (0 = not at all; 1 = a little bit; 2 = somewhat; 3 = quite a bit; 4 = very much). The total score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating less fatigue. Change from baseline in the FACIT- fatigue score at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose B compared to placebo will be reported.

Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR50 Response at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Active ComparatorAt Week 16

ACR responses are the numerical measurement of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. It is a composite COA measure that includes both ClinROs and PROs. An ACR50 response is defined as: \>= 50% improvement from baseline in both SJC66 and TJC68, and \>=50% improvement from baseline in 3 of the following 5 assessments: PtGA of PsA pain; PtGA of PsA; PGA of PsA; participant's assessment of physical function as measured by HAQ-DI; hsCRP. Percentage of participants achieving ACR50 response at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to active comparator will be reported.

Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR70 Response at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Active ComparatorAt Week 16

ACR responses are the numerical measurement of improvement in multiple disease assessment criteria. It is a composite COA measure that includes both ClinROs and PROs. An ACR70 response is defined as: \>=70% improvement from baseline in both SJC66 and TJC68, and \>=70% improvement from baseline in 3 of the following 5 assessments: PtGA of PsA pain; PtGA of PsA; PGA of PsA; participant's assessment of physical function as measured by HAQ-DI; hsCRP. Percentage of participants achieving ACR70 response at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to active comparator will be reported.

Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI-90 Response (in Participants With a Baseline >=3% BSA) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Active ComparatorBaseline, at Week 16

A PASI-90 response is defined as \>=90% improvement in the PASI score from baseline. It is a ClinRO used to measure psoriasis severity, combining the percent of affected skin surface area with the severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation across four body regions: head, upper extremities, trunk, and lower extremities. Severity is scored on a 0-4 scale, with 0 indicating no involvement and 4 indicating very marked involvement. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with \<=3 representing mild disease, \>=3 to 15 representing moderate disease, and \>=15 indicating severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving PASI-90 response (in participants with a baseline \>=3% BSA) at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to active comparator will be reported.

Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI-100 Response (in Participants With a Baseline >=3% BSA) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Active ComparatorBaseline, at Week 16

A PASI-100 response is defined as \>=100% improvement in the PASI score from baseline. It is a ClinRO used to measure psoriasis severity, combining the percent of affected skin surface area with the severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation across four body regions: head, upper extremities, trunk, and lower extremities. Severity is scored on a 0-4 scale, with 0 indicating no involvement and 4 indicating very marked involvement. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with \<=3 representing mild disease, \>=3 to 15 representing moderate disease, and \>=15 indicating severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving PASI-100 response (in participants with a baseline \>=3% BSA) at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to active comparator will be reported.

Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR50 and PASI-100 Response (in Participants With a Baseline >=3% BSA) Simultaneously at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Active ComparatorBaseline, at Week 16

ACR responses measure improvement in multiple criteria, a composite COA with ClinROs and PROs. An ACR50 response is \>=50% improvement in SJC66 and TJC68, and 3 of 5 assessments: PtGA of PsA pain; PtGA of PsA; PGA of PsA, HAQ-DI, hsCRP. A PASI-100 response is \>=100% improvement in the PASI score from baseline. It's a ClinRO measuring psoriasis severity, combining the percent of affected skin surface area with the severity of erythema, induration, and desquamation across four body regions: head, upper extremities, trunk, and lower extremities. Severity is scored from 0 (no involvement) to 4 (very marked involvement). PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with \<=3 as mild, \>=3 to 15 as moderate, and \>=15 as severe disease. Percentage of participants achieving ACR50 and PASI-100 response (in participants with a baseline \>=3% BSA) simultaneously at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to active comparator will be reported.

Percentage of Participants Achieving Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) at Week 16 for Zasocitinib Dose A and B Compared to Active ComparatorAt Week 16

The MDA is defined as a composite outcome measure of 7 ClinROs and PROs used in PsA. Participants are classified as achieving MDA if they fulfil 5 of 7 outcome measures: TJC68 less than or equal to (\<=) 1, SJC66 \<=1, psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score \<=1 or body surface area (BSA) affected by psoriasis \<=3%, PtGA of PsA Pain score \<=15, PtGA of PsA score \<=20, HAQ-DI \<=0.5, and Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) \<=1. Percentage of participants achieving MDA at Week 16 for zasocitinib Dose A and B compared to active comparator will be reported.

Trial Locations

Locations (196)

FutureMeds Wroclaw

🇵🇱

Wrocław, Poland

AARR- Chandler AZ

🇺🇸

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Research, PLLC | Phoenix, AZ

🇺🇸

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

First OC Dermatology Research Inc.

🇺🇸

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Purushotham & Akther Kotha MD

🇺🇸

La Mesa, California, United States

Triwest Research Associates LLC

🇺🇸

La Mesa, California, United States

VA Northern California Health Care System | Sacramento VA Medical Center

🇺🇸

Mather, California, United States

Amicis Research Center | Northridge, CA

🇺🇸

Northridge, California, United States

Biosolutions Research Center | La Mesa, CA

🇺🇸

Poway, California, United States

The Cohen Medical Centers

🇺🇸

Thousand Oaks, California, United States

Foothill Arthritis Clinic

🇺🇸

Tujunga, California, United States

Amicus Arthritis & Osteoporosis Center (AAOC)

🇺🇸

Whittier, California, United States

Denver Arthritis Clinic | Denver, CO

🇺🇸

Denver, Colorado, United States

Arthritis & Rheumatic Disease Specialties (AARDS)

🇺🇸

Aventura, Florida, United States

RASF- Clinical Research Center

🇺🇸

Boca Raton, Florida, United States

Clinical Research of West Florida | Clearwater, FL

🇺🇸

Clearwater, Florida, United States

GNP Research, LLC | Hollywood, FL

🇺🇸

Cooper City, Florida, United States

Driven Research LLC

🇺🇸

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Tectum Medical Research

🇺🇸

Davie, Florida, United States

Sweet Hope Research Specialty, Inc, d/b/a Neoclinical Research

🇺🇸

Hialeah, Florida, United States

LeJenue Research Associates PLLC | Miami, FL

🇺🇸

Miami, Florida, United States

Bioresearch Partners

🇺🇸

Miami, Florida, United States

HMD Research LLC | Orlando, FL

🇺🇸

Orlando, Florida, United States

Millennium Research | Ormond Beach, FL

🇺🇸

Ormond Beach, Florida, United States

IRIS Research and Development | Plantation, FL

🇺🇸

Plantation, Florida, United States

Sarasota Arthritis Research Center

🇺🇸

Sarasota, Florida, United States

West Broward Rheumatology Associates, Inc.

🇺🇸

Tamarac, Florida, United States

Clinical Research of West Florida | Tampa, FL

🇺🇸

Tampa, Florida, United States

Marietta Rheumatology Associates

🇺🇸

Marietta, Georgia, United States

Greater Chicago Specialty Physicians LLC/CIS

🇺🇸

Schaumburg, Illinois, United States

Accurate Clinical Research, Inc. | Lake Charles

🇺🇸

Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States

Klein & Associates, M.D., P.A.

🇺🇸

Hagerstown, Maryland, United States

Henry Ford Health System-Rheumatology Department

🇺🇸

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Michigan Rheumatology Group, P.C. - Grand Blanc Office

🇺🇸

Grand Blanc, Michigan, United States

June DO, PC Private Practice - Dr. Justus Fiechtner

🇺🇸

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Clinical Research Institute of Michigan

🇺🇸

Saint Clair Shores, Michigan, United States

Ascent Urgent Care & Walk In Clinic

🇺🇸

Saline, Michigan, United States

Saint Louis Rheumatology

🇺🇸

Saint Louis, Missouri, United States

Albuquerque Center for Rheumatology PC

🇺🇸

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Inspire Santa Fe Medical Group

🇺🇸

Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States

NYU Langone Health | Joseph S. and Diane H. Steinberg Ambulatory Care Center - Rheumatology Department

🇺🇸

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Accellacare of Hickory

🇺🇸

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

University Hospitals | UH Cleveland Medical Center - Department of Medicine - Rheumatology Division

🇺🇸

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Paramount Medical Research & Consulting, LLC

🇺🇸

Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States

PA Regional Center for Arthritis and Osteoporosis Research

🇺🇸

Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States

West Tennessee Research Institute

🇺🇸

Jackson, Tennessee, United States

Accurate Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

🇺🇸

Dallas, Texas, United States

Novel Research | Bellaire Location

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

Introscience Research | Northwest Houston Arthritis Center - Houston, TX

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

West Texas Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Southwest Rheumatology Research, LLC | Mesquite, TX

🇺🇸

Mesquite, Texas, United States

Clinical Investigations of Texas

🇺🇸

Plano, Texas, United States

Arthritis Northwest, PLLC | Spokane, WA

🇺🇸

Spokane, Washington, United States

Medical College of Wisconsin | Department of Medicine - Rheumatology Division

🇺🇸

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Université Libre de Bruxelles

🇧🇪

Anderlecht, Brussels, Belgium

University Hospital Ghent

🇧🇪

Gent, Flanders, Belgium

RerumaClinic Genk

🇧🇪

Genk, Limburg, Belgium

St Pierre Brussels

🇧🇪

Brussels, Belgium

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Liege - Domaine Universitaire du Sart Tilman

🇧🇪

Liege, Belgium

Diagnostic Consultative Centre - Focus-5 - LZIP EOOD

🇧🇬

Sofia, Sofia-Grad, Bulgaria

Military Medical Academy Multiprofile Hospital for Not Yet Recruiting Treatment - Sofia

🇧🇬

Sofia, Sofia-Grad, Bulgaria

Centre of Rheumatology St. Irina

🇧🇬

Sofia, Sofia-Grad, Bulgaria

Medical Center Medconsult Pleven OOD

🇧🇬

Pleven, Bulgaria

AES Partner Site -Plovdiv

🇧🇬

Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Medical Center Artmed OOD | Plovdiv, Bulgaria

🇧🇬

Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Diagnostic- Consultative Center- 1- Ruse EOOD

🇧🇬

Ruse, Bulgaria

Dr Stoyanka Vladeva IPSMP VBR | Stara Zagora, Bulgaria

🇧🇬

Stara Zagora, Bulgaria

Medical Center Zara-Med EOOD

🇧🇬

Stara Zagora, Bulgaria

Clinica Dermacross S.A.

🇨🇱

Santiago, Region Metropolitana De Santiago, Chile

El Centro de Estudios Reumatologicos (CER)

🇨🇱

Providencia, Santiago, Chile

Centro de Estudios Clinicos

🇨🇱

Santiago, Chile

CTR Estudios

🇨🇱

Santiago, Chile

Centro Internacional de Estudios Clínicos

🇨🇱

Santiago, Chile

Centro Integral de Reumatologia Circaribe S.A.S.

🇨🇴

Barranquilla, Atlantico, Colombia

Centro de Investigacion en Reumatologia y Especialidades Medicas S.A.S, CIREEM S.A.S

🇨🇴

Bogota D.C., Cundinamarca, Colombia

Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota

🇨🇴

Bogotá D.C., Cundinamarca, Colombia

Servimed S.A.S

🇨🇴

Bucaramanga, Cundinamarca, Colombia

Preventive Care S.A.S.

🇨🇴

Chia, Cundinamarca, Colombia

Medicinski Centar Kuna and Peric

🇭🇷

Zagreb, Grad Zagreb, Croatia

Clinical Hospital Centre Osijek

🇭🇷

Osijek, Croatia

Clinical Hospital Center Rijeka

🇭🇷

Rijeka, Croatia

University Hospital Centre Split

🇭🇷

Split, Croatia

General Hospital Zadar

🇭🇷

Zadar, Croatia

Revmatologie s.r.o. | Brno, Czech Republic

🇨🇿

Brno, Czech Rep, Czechia

L.K.N. Arthrocentrum, s.r.o. - Revmatologicka

🇨🇿

Hlučín, Czech Rep, Czechia

Praglandia | Prague, Czech Republic

🇨🇿

Prague, Czech Rep, Czechia

Clintrial s.r.o. | Prague, Czech Republic

🇨🇿

Praha 10, Czech Rep, Czechia

MEDICAL Plus s.r.o.

🇨🇿

Uherske Hradiste, Czech Rep, Czechia

CCR Ostrava

🇨🇿

Ostrava, Moravskoslezský Kraj, Czechia

Pv Medical Services

🇨🇿

Zlin, NAP, Czechia

Revmatologicky ustav | Clinical Evaluation Department

🇨🇿

Praha 2, Prague, Czechia

Pratia Pardubice a.s.

🇨🇿

Pardubice, Czechia

Innomedica OU | Tallinn, Estonia

🇪🇪

Tallinn, Harjumaa, Estonia

Center for Clinical and Basic Research

🇪🇪

Tallinn, Harjumaa, Estonia

Clinical Research Centre | Tartu, Estonia

🇪🇪

Tartu, Tartumaa, Estonia

North Estonia Medical Centre | Mustamae Building - Internal Medicine Clinic - Rheumatology Department

🇪🇪

Tallinn, Estonia

MediTrials OÜ

🇪🇪

Tartu, Estonia

Rheumzentrum Prof.Dr.med.Gunther Neeck

🇩🇪

Bad Doberan, MV, Germany

Fachklinik Bad Bentheim

🇩🇪

Bad Bentheim, Niedersachsen, Germany

Rheumazentrum Ratingen-Studienambulanz

🇩🇪

Ratingen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Universitaetsklinikum Leipzig AoeR

🇩🇪

Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany

Rheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis | Berlin, Germany

🇩🇪

Berlin, Germany

Städtisches Klinikum Dresden

🇩🇪

Dresden, Germany

MVZ Rheumatologie und Autoimmunmedizin Hamburg GmbH - Hamburg

🇩🇪

Hamburg, Germany

Praxis für Klinische Studien | Hamburg, Germany

🇩🇪

Hamburg, Germany

Medicover MVZ München Ost

🇩🇪

München, Germany

Porcika Klinika

🇭🇺

Hodmezovasarhely, Csongrad-Csanad, Hungary

Szegedi Tudomanyegyetem Szent-Gyorgyi Albert Klinikai Kozpont

🇭🇺

Szeged, Csongrad-Csanad, Hungary

CMed Rehabilitacios es Diagnosztikai Kozpont

🇭🇺

Szekesfehervar, Fejer, Hungary

Qualiclinic | Budapest, Hungary

🇭🇺

Budapest, Hungary

Fejer Varmegyei Szent Gyorgy Egyetemi Oktató Korhaz | Rheumatology Department - Arthritis Center

🇭🇺

Szekesfehervar, Hungary

Vital Medical Center Medical Center and Dental Center | Reumatologia - Veszprem, Hungary

🇭🇺

Veszprem, Hungary

Assuta Ashdod Medical Center

🇮🇱

Ashdod, HaDarom, Israel

Barzilai Medical Center | Rheumatology Department

🇮🇱

Ashkelon, Israel

Rambam Health Care Campus

🇮🇱

Haifa, Israel

Galilee Medical Center | Rheumatology Unit

🇮🇱

Nahariya, Israel

The Chaim Sheba Medical Center - The Zabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases

🇮🇱

Ramat Gan, Israel

Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

🇮🇱

Tel Aviv, Israel

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche; SOD Clinica Medica

🇮🇹

Torrette, Ancona, Italy

Fondazione PTV Policlinico Tor Vergata

🇮🇹

Roma, Lazio, Italy

Policlinico Agostino Gemelli, UOC Reumatology

🇮🇹

Roma, Lazio, Italy

ASST Centro Specialistico Ortopedico Traumatologico Gaetano Pini-CTO

🇮🇹

Milan, Lombardia, Italy

Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) - Ospedale San Raffaele

🇮🇹

Milan, Lombardia, Italy

IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas

🇮🇹

Rozzano, Milano, Italy

Universita Degli Studi Di Padova

🇮🇹

Padova, Padua, Italy

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi

🇮🇹

Firenze, Italy

Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana

🇮🇹

Pisa, Italy

The Catholic University of Korea

🇰🇷

Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of

Ajou University Hospital | Clinical Trial Center

🇰🇷

Suwon-si, Gyeonggido, Korea, Republic of

Asan Medical Center

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

SMG - SNU Boramae Medical Center

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Kyung Hee University Hospital

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

D. Saulites Kandevicas Private Practice in Cardiology and Rheumatology | Liepaja, Latvia

🇱🇻

Liepaja, Latvia

ORTO Clinic | Rheumatology Department

🇱🇻

Riga, Latvia

Centro de Investigacion en Artritis y Osteoporosis S.C. (CIAO)

🇲🇽

Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico

HMG Hospital Coyoacan

🇲🇽

Ciudad de Mexico, Cdmx, Mexico

Consultorio de Reumatologia

🇲🇽

Gustavo A. Madero, Distrito Federal, Mexico

CINTRE, Centro de Investigacion y Tratamiento Reumatologico S.C.

🇲🇽

Mexico, Distrito Federal, Mexico

iBiomed Guadalajara

🇲🇽

Zapopan, Guadalajara, Mexico

Centro Integral en Reumatologia, S.A. de C.V.

🇲🇽

Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico

Private Practice - Dr. Delfina Villanueva Quintero

🇲🇽

Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico

Kohler and Milstein Research Yucatan

🇲🇽

Merida, Yucatan, Mexico

Hospitales Star Medica

🇲🇽

Merida, Yucatan, Mexico

Office of Cesar F. Pacheco-Tena, MD

🇲🇽

Chihuahua, Mexico

CGM Research Trust

🇳🇿

Christchurch Central, Christchurch, New Zealand

Aotearoa Clinical Trials

🇳🇿

Auckland, North Island, New Zealand

North Shore Hospital

🇳🇿

Auckland, North Island, New Zealand

Porter Rheumatology Ltd

🇳🇿

Nelson, South Island, New Zealand

Waikato Hospital

🇳🇿

Hamilton, Waikato, New Zealand

Centrum Medyczne Katowice - PRATIA

🇵🇱

Katowice, Dolnoslaskie, Poland

WroMedica Centrum Zdrowia | Rheumatology Clinic

🇵🇱

Wroclaw, Dolnoslaskie, Poland

Pratia MCM Krakow

🇵🇱

Krakow, Malopolskie, Poland

Krakowskie Centrum Medyczne

🇵🇱

Krakow, Malopolskie, Poland

Centrum Medyczne Plejady

🇵🇱

Kraków, Malopolskie, Poland

RCMed | Sochaczew, Poland

🇵🇱

Sochaczew, Mazowieckie, Poland

Klinika Reuma Park

🇵🇱

Warsaw, Mazowieckie, Poland

Rheuma Medicus | Warsaw, Poland

🇵🇱

Warszawa, Mazowieckie, Poland

MTZ Clinical Research Powered by PRATIA

🇵🇱

Warszawa, Mazowieckie, Poland

Narodowy Instytut Geriatrii, Reumatologii i Rehabilitacji im. prof. dr hab. med. Eleonory Reicher, Centrum Wsparcia Badań Klinic

🇵🇱

Warszawa, Mazowieckie, Poland

ETG Warszawa

🇵🇱

Warszawa, Mazowieckie, Poland

Twoja Przychodnia | Opole, Poland

🇵🇱

Opole, Opolskie, Poland

INTER CLINIC Piotr Adrian Klimiuk | Bialystok, Poland

🇵🇱

Bialystok, Podlaskie, Poland

Nova Reuma Domyslawska i Rusilowicz- Spolka Partnerska Lekarza Reumatologa i Fizjoterapeuty

🇵🇱

Bialystok, Podlaskie, Poland

Zdrowie Osteo Medic sc L i A Racewicz, A i J Supronik

🇵🇱

Bialystok, Podlaskie, Poland

MICS Centrum Medyczne Torun

🇵🇱

Torun, Silesia, Poland

Etyka Osrodek Badan Klinicznych | Olsztyn, Poland

🇵🇱

Olsztyn, Warmia-Masuria, Poland

UNICA CR sp. z.o. o.

🇵🇱

Dabrowka, Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship, Poland

Ambulatorium Sp. z o.o.

🇵🇱

Elbląg, Warminsko-Mazurskie, Poland

Twoja Przychodnia - Poznanskie Centrum Medyczne Sp. z o.o.

🇵🇱

Poznan, Wielkopolska, Poland

Reumedika | Poznan, Poland

🇵🇱

Poznan, Wlkp, Poland

Prywatna Praktyka Lekarska Prof. dr hab. med. Pawel Hrycaj | Poznan, Poland

🇵🇱

Poznan, Woj. Wielkopolskie, Poland

Pratia Poznań

🇵🇱

Poznan, Wojewodztwo Wielkopolskie, Poland

Twoja Przychodnia | Nowa Sol, Poland

🇵🇱

Nowa Sól, Poland

Santa Familia PTG Lodz | Lodz, Poland

🇵🇱

Łódź, Poland

FutureMeds | Lodz Center - Lodz, Poland

🇵🇱

Łódź, Poland

Bif-Med s.c. NZOZ

🇵🇱

Bytom, Śląskie, Poland

Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra E.P.E - Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra

🇵🇹

Coimbra, Portugal

Hospital Conde de Bertiandos Unidade Local de Saúde Do Alto Minho

🇵🇹

Ponte de Lima, Barcelona, Portugal

Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia / Espinho E.P.E

🇵🇹

Vila Nova de Gaia, New Mexico, Portugal

Hospital Garcia de Orta

🇵🇹

Almada, Portugal

Instituto Portugues de Reumatologia

🇵🇹

Lisboa, Portugal

Centro Hospitalar Universitario de Lisboa Norte | Hospital Santa Maria - Rheumatology Department

🇵🇹

Lisboa, Portugal

Centro Reumatologico de Caguas | Caguas, PR

🇵🇷

Caguas, Puerto Rico

GCM Medical Group, PSC | San Juan, PR

🇵🇷

San Juan, Puerto Rico

Hospital Universitario de Badajoz

🇪🇸

Merida, Badajoz, Spain

Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Tauli - Hospital de Sabadell

🇪🇸

Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain

Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela | Building A - Rheumatology Department

🇪🇸

Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain

Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga

🇪🇸

Malaga, Spain

Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena

🇪🇸

Sevilla, Spain

Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia

🇪🇸

Valencia, Spain

National Cheng Kung University

🇨🇳

Tainan, Tainan City, Taiwan

National Taiwan University Hospital

🇨🇳

Zhong Zheng Qu, Taipei City, Taiwan

Far Eastern Memorial Hospital | Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology Department

🇨🇳

New Taipei City, Taiwan

Chung Shan Medical University Hospital

🇨🇳

Taichung, Taiwan

Chi Mei Medical Center

🇨🇳

Tainan City, Taiwan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath