Leveraging Social Media to Increase Lung Cancer Screening Awareness, Knowledge and Uptake in High-Risk Populations
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 512
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Effectiveness of LungTalk - Occurrence of a Patient-Clinician Discussion
研究概览
简要总结
LungTalk and leveraging Facebook-targeted Advertisement (FBTA) addresses the call to develop and test multi-level, cancer communication interventions using innovative methods and designs. The study's long term goal is to increase lung cancer screening uptake among appropriate, high-risk individuals nationwide.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Screening
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 50 Years 至 80 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •≥20-pack-year smoking history;
- •Individuals who currently smoke or quit smoking within the past 15 years
排除标准
- •Previously undergone LDCT for early detection of lung cancer, have a lung nodule or nodules that are currently being followed
- •Has ever been diagnosed with lung cancer
- •Individuals with impaired decision-making (because our primary outcome is decision-making, we will not include individuals with impaired decision-making)
结局指标
主要结局
Effectiveness of LungTalk - Occurrence of a Patient-Clinician Discussion
时间窗: At 6 months from baseline survey completion
The assessment plan is intended to compare the effectiveness of a tailored (LungTalk) versus non-tailored health communication and decision support tool delivered online to improve Occurrence of a Patient-Clinician Discussion. Occurrence of a Patient-Clinician Discussion about Lung Cancer Screening will be assessed with a single item requiring dichotomous (Y/N) response regarding a discussion with their healthcare provider.
Effectiveness of LungTalk - Screening Uptake
时间窗: At 6 months from baseline survey completion
The assessment plan is intended to compare the effectiveness of a tailored (LungTalk) versus non-tailored health communication and decision support tool delivered online to improve Screening Uptake, Lung Cancer Screening Uptake will be assessed via self-report via the stages of adoption algorithm for lung screening. There are seven stages (unaware, aware but unengaged, undecided, decided not to act, decided to act, action, and maintenance).
Effectiveness of LungTalk - Knowledge Assessment
时间窗: At one week from baseline survey completion
The assessment plan is intended to compare the effectiveness of a tailored (LungTalk) versus non-tailored health communication and decision support tool delivered online to improve total knowledge about lung screening. The total Knowledge of Lung Cancer Screening will be assessed with a 9-item multidimensional scale ranging from 0 to 9 with 0 being "No Knowledge" and 9 being "Complete knowledge".
Effectiveness of LungTalk - Perceived Risk
时间窗: At one week from baseline survey completion
The assessment plan is intended to compare the effectiveness of a tailored (LungTalk) versus non-tailored health communication and decision support tool delivered online to improve Perceived Risk. Perceived Risk of Lung Cancer is a 3-item scale with Likert-type responses. The range of scores is 3 to 12 (higher perceived risk of lung cancer).
Effectiveness of LungTalk - Perceived Benefits
时间窗: At one week from baseline survey completion
The assessment plan is intended to compare the effectiveness of a tailored (LungTalk) versus non-tailored health communication and decision support tool delivered online to improve Perceived Benefits. Perceived Benefits of Lung Cancer Screening is a 6-item scale with responses ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 4=strongly agree. The range of scores is 6 to 24 (higher perceived benefits).
Effectiveness of LungTalk - Perceived Barriers
时间窗: At one week from baseline survey completion
The assessment plan is intended to compare the effectiveness of a tailored (LungTalk) versus non-tailored health communication and decision support tool delivered online to improve Perceived Barriers. Perceived Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening. This scale has 17 items with four-point Likert responses where 1=strongly disagree and 4=strongly agree. The range of scores is 17 to 68 (higher perceived barriers).
Effectiveness of LungTalk - Self-Efficacy
时间窗: At one week from baseline survey completion
The assessment plan is intended to compare the effectiveness of a tailored (LungTalk) versus non-tailored health communication and decision support tool delivered online to improve Self-Efficacy. Self-Efficacy for Lung Cancer Screening will be assessed using a scale with nine items with a four-point Likert response option to assess individual beliefs about ability to arrange and complete a low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) to screen for lung cancer. The range of scores is 9 to 36 (higher levels of self-efficacy).
Effectiveness of LungTalk - Perceived Barriers
时间窗: At one week from baseline survey completion
The assessment plan is intended to compare the effectiveness of a tailored (LungTalk) versus non-tailored health communication and decision support tool delivered online to improve Perceived Barriers. Perceived Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening. This scale has 17 items with four-point Likert responses where 1=strongly disagree and 4=strongly agree. The range of scores is 17 to 68 (higher perceived barriers).
Effectiveness of LungTalk - Self-Efficacy
时间窗: At one week from baseline survey completion
The assessment plan is intended to compare the effectiveness of a tailored (LungTalk) versus non-tailored health communication and decision support tool delivered online to improve Self-Efficacy. Self-Efficacy for Lung Cancer Screening will be assessed using a scale with nine items with a four-point Likert response option to assess individual beliefs about ability to arrange and complete a low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) to screen for lung cancer. The range of scores is 9 to 36 (higher levels of self-efficacy).
Reaching Screening Eligible Individuals Via Social Media - Reach
时间窗: 11-month period ad remained active on Facebook
Leveraging a well-established, social media-based platform (Facebook) to target screening-eligible individuals in the community. This will be measured by the total number of people who saw the FBTA at least once.
Reaching Screening Eligible Individuals Via Social Media - Link Clicks
时间窗: 11-month period ad remained active on Facebook
Leveraging a well-established, social media-based platform (Facebook) to target screening-eligible individuals in the community. This will be measured by the total number of clicks on the link within the FBTA that led to the REDCap survey platform of the study.
Effectiveness of LungTalk - Knowledge Assessment
时间窗: At one week from baseline survey completion
The assessment plan is intended to compare the effectiveness of a tailored (LungTalk) versus non-tailored health communication and decision support tool delivered online to improve total knowledge about lung screening. The total Knowledge of Lung Cancer Screening will be assessed with a 9-item multidimensional scale ranging from 0 to 9 with 0 being "No Knowledge" and 9 being "Complete knowledge".
Effectiveness of LungTalk - Perceived Risk
时间窗: At one week from baseline survey completion
The assessment plan is intended to compare the effectiveness of a tailored (LungTalk) versus non-tailored health communication and decision support tool delivered online to improve Perceived Risk. Perceived Risk of Lung Cancer is a 3-item scale with Likert-type responses. The range of scores is 3 to 12 (higher perceived risk of lung cancer).
Reaching Screening Eligible Individuals Via Social Media - Impressions
时间窗: 11-month period ad remained active on Facebook
Leveraging a well-established, social media-based platform (Facebook) to target screening-eligible individuals in the community. This will be measured by the total number of times the FBTA was on screen (may include multiple views of the ad by the same person/people).
Effectiveness of LungTalk - Screening Uptake
时间窗: At 6 months from baseline survey completion
The assessment plan is intended to compare the effectiveness of a tailored (LungTalk) versus non-tailored health communication and decision support tool delivered online to improve Screening Uptake, Lung Cancer Screening Uptake will be assessed via self-report via the stages of adoption algorithm for lung screening. There are seven stages (unaware, aware but unengaged, undecided, decided not to act, decided to act, action, and maintenance).
Effectiveness of LungTalk - Perceived Benefits
时间窗: At one week from baseline survey completion
The assessment plan is intended to compare the effectiveness of a tailored (LungTalk) versus non-tailored health communication and decision support tool delivered online to improve Perceived Benefits. Perceived Benefits of Lung Cancer Screening is a 6-item scale with responses ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 4=strongly agree. The range of scores is 6 to 24 (higher perceived benefits).
Effectiveness of LungTalk - Occurrence of a Patient-Clinician Discussion
时间窗: At 6 months from baseline survey completion
The assessment plan is intended to compare the effectiveness of a tailored (LungTalk) versus non-tailored health communication and decision support tool delivered online to improve Occurrence of a Patient-Clinician Discussion. Occurrence of a Patient-Clinician Discussion about Lung Cancer Screening will be assessed with a single item requiring dichotomous (Y/N) response regarding a discussion with their healthcare provider.
次要结局
未报告次要终点