New Alternative Formats vs Standard of SoF Tables. Non-inferiority Controlled Trial

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Summary of Findings Table; GRADE Approach; Cochrane Collaboration
• Interventions: Other: Current summary of findings table format; Other: Alternative summary of findings table format

• Registration Number: NCT02022631
• Lead Sponsor: McMaster University

Brief Summary

The investigators will conduct a parallel two-armed, non-inferiority randomized trial comparing new alternative formats of summary of findings tables (SoF) tables with current formats. The investigators will contact Cochrane review users by email and will ask them to fill a questionnaire developed using the "Survey Monkey" online system. The survey will include questions about baseline information (demographic characteristics, background, number of visits to the Cochrane Library, familiarity with the GRADE system, etc.). Then, participants will be stratified (health professional, guideline developer, researcher) and randomly assigned to one of the two SoF table formats, either the alternative (Table A) or the current one (Table C). Participants will be asked to answer questions to determine understanding, accessibility, and satisfaction with the formats to which they were randomized. Finally, the investigators will show them the table format to which they were not initially allocated in order to test their preference for either one.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2013-12
• Study First Submitted: 2013-12-13
• Study First Submitted QC: 2013-12-21
• Study First Posted: 2013-12-30
• Primary Completion: 2014-12
• Study Completion: 2014-12
• Status Verified: 2021-12
• Last Update Submitted: 2021-12-09
• Last Update Posted: 2021-12-13

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 290

Inclusion Criteria

• Cochrane review users
• Authors of systematic reviews
• Health professionals
• Guideline developers
• Researchers

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Current SoF	Current summary of findings table format	Investigators will compare one SoF table with alternative formats (Table A) against one SoF table with the current formats (Table B). In both tables, the clinical question in terms of patients and setting, intervention, comparator, and outcomes informed by the tables, and the complementary information included as footnotes will be the same. The only differences between the current and alternative SoF table formats will be different methods to either show the same data in a different way or to provide complementary data to the one showed in the current format (i.e. supplementary data as risk difference).
Alternative SoF	Alternative summary of findings table format	Investigators will compare one SoF table with alternative formats (Table A) against one SoF table with the current formats (Table B). In both tables, the clinical question in terms of patients and setting, intervention, comparator, and outcomes informed by the tables, and the complementary information included as footnotes will be the same. The only differences between the current and alternative SoF table formats will be different methods to either show the same data in a different way or to provide complementary data to the one showed in the current format (i.e. supplementary data as risk difference).

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Understanding of key findings	30 minutes	Investigators will frame multiple-choice questions about key concepts in the table with five response alternatives for each question and only one correct answer. Then, investigators will compare the proportion of correct answers between groups per question

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Accessibility of information	30 minutes	This outcome will consider 3 domains: (1) how easy is to find critical information in the table, (2) how easy is to understand the information, and (3) whether the information is presented in a way that is helpful for decision-making. These three domains will be measured presenting to participants three statements to which they have to indicate the degree of agreement: "It was easy to find the information about the effects", "It was easy to understand the information", and "The information is presented in a way that would help me make a decision" using a 7-point Likert scale (1= I strongly disagree, 2= I disagree, 3= I somewhat disagree, 4= Not sure, 5= I somewhat agree, 6= I agree, and 7= I strongly agree). The outcome overall accessibility of information will be obtained as the average of responses for each domain, per participant.
Overall satisfaction	30 minutes	It will be measured using a 7-point Likert scale with 3 anchors: 1= strongly dissatisfied, 4= neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 7= strongly satisfied, and it will be treated as a continuous outcome. Investigators will compare the means per group.
Preference	30 minutes	This outcome taps the question: Between alternative (Table A) and current format (Table B) of SoF table, "which table does the user prefer?" It will be measured using a 5-point Likert scale (1= strongly prefer table B, 2= I prefer table B, 3= Both table A and B are good to me, 4= I prefer table A, 5= I strongly prefer table A), and it will be treated as continuous outcome. Investigators will describe the data obtained in each group. Other questions related to participants' preference for each alternative item will be included.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

McMaster University; 🇨🇦 Hamilton, Ontario, Canada