Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment (EPSIT) Versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) Versus Lay Open Technique
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Recurrence
研究概览
简要总结
Aim of the work To compare Sinus Laser closure versus lay open technique versus Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment as regards recurrence rate, operative data, postoperative pain, intra and postoperative complications, healing time and return to daily activity.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •patients with symptoms from sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus .
排除标准
- •Abscess formation
- •Immunodeficiency.
- •Patients with congenital asymptomatic pits.
- •Patient with psychiatric disease disabling surgical intervention. . Pregnant females.
研究组 & 干预措施
Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT)
Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT)
干预措施: Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) versus lay open technique (Procedure)
Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC)
Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC)
干预措施: Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) versus lay open technique (Procedure)
lay open technique
lay open technique
干预措施: Endoscopic Pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSIT) versus Sinus Laser Closure (SiLaC) versus lay open technique (Procedure)
结局指标
主要结局
Recurrence
时间窗: one year
Recurrence of pilonidal sinus after treatment
次要结局
未报告次要终点