Mid-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial comparing ultrasound-guided double percutaneous needling versus high-energy extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the treatment of calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff.
- Conditions
- calcific tendinitisshoulder pain10043237
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON51922
- Lead Sponsor
- Spaarne Gasthuis
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Pending
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 81
Inclusion Criteria
Participation in original KALK study
Exclusion Criteria
No participation in original KALK study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational invasive
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>The primary objective of this study is to analyse the difference in functional<br /><br>outcome, measured by the Constant Murley Scale at midterm follow-up, after<br /><br>treatment with high-energy ESWT versus ultrasound-guided needling in patients<br /><br>with symptomatic calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff.</p><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <p>* VAS (pain) scale<br /><br>* VAS (satisfaction) scale<br /><br>* Patient reported change in symptoms (7 point likert scale)<br /><br>* Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score<br /><br>* The presence or resorption of the calcific deposits on conventional<br /><br>radiography of the shoulder<br /><br>* Work-ability score questionnaire </p><br>