MedPath

Diamond Bur Microblepharoexfoliation, Intense Pulse Light and Meibomian Gland Expression for Evaporative Dry Eye

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Dry Eye Disease
Interventions
Procedure: Microblepharoexfoliation
Procedure: Intense pulse light
Procedure: Meibomian gland expression
Drug: Home-based therapy
Registration Number
NCT05857579
Lead Sponsor
University of Seville
Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of microblepharoeexfoliation (MBE), intense pulse light (IPL) and meibomian gland expression (MGX) combination in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).

The main question it aims to answer are:

* Does MBE-IPL-MGX treatment improve dry eye symptoms?

* Does MBE-IPL-MGX treatment improve dry eye signs?

Participants were assigned to receive either three sessions of MBE-IPL-MGX treatment and home-based therapy (treatment group) or home-based therapy alone (control group).

The investigators will compare both groups to see if MBE-IPL-MGX treatment is superior to home-based therapy.

Detailed Description

MBE is a novel in-office treatment that works by exfoliating the eyelid margins to remove the accumulated biofilm debris, epithelial keratinization and capped meibomian glands, resulting in better meibum outflow . Different studies have shown that MBE improves DED symptoms \[1,2\], demodex blepharitis \[1-4\] and meibomian gland function \[2,3,5\] In addition, meta-analyses recommend combining IPL with meibomian gland expression (MGX) compared to IPL or MGX alone \[6-8\]. However, the investigators have not found any studies evaluating the benefits of MBE combined with IPL and MGX.

Consequently, the purpose of the current study is to evaluate whether MBE combined with IPL and MGX leads to an improvement of symptoms and signs in patients with DED due to MGD.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
70
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Age ≥ 18 years old
  2. DED diagnosis according to DEWS II meeting one of the following conditions: (2.1) ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score ≥ 13; (2.2) NIBUT < 10 seconds; and (2.3) ocular surface staining with > 5 or 9 corneal or conjunctival stains, respectively.
  3. MGD diagnosis according to the international workshop on MGD meeting two of the following conditions: (3.1) irregularity of the eyelid margin or mucocutaneous junction; (3.2) vascularity of the eyelid margin; (3.3) plugged or capped Meibomian gland orifices; (3.4) Meibomian gland atrophy; or (3.5) decreased meibum quality and quantity
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Skin pathologies that prevent IPL treatment
  2. All corneal disorders that affect diagnostic tests, such as: (2.1) active corneal infections; and (2.2) corneal dystrophies.
  3. Active ocular allergy.
  4. Pregnant or lactating women..
  5. Patients who did not understand or comprehend the informed consent.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
MBE-IPL-MGX treatment and home-based therapy.Home-based therapyIn this arm, participants received three sessions of MBE-IPL-MGX treatment and home-based therapy.
MBE-IPL-MGX treatment and home-based therapy.Intense pulse lightIn this arm, participants received three sessions of MBE-IPL-MGX treatment and home-based therapy.
MBE-IPL-MGX treatment and home-based therapy.Meibomian gland expressionIn this arm, participants received three sessions of MBE-IPL-MGX treatment and home-based therapy.
Home-based therapyHome-based therapyIn this arm, participants received home-based therapy alone.
MBE-IPL-MGX treatment and home-based therapy.MicroblepharoexfoliationIn this arm, participants received three sessions of MBE-IPL-MGX treatment and home-based therapy.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Tear meniscus height (TMH)Change from Baseline TMH at 2 months.
Meibomian gland secretions (MGS)Change from Baseline MGS at 2 months.

Values from 0 (Worse) to 45 (Better)

Conjunctival hyperemiaChange from Baseline Conjunctival Hyperemia at 2 months.

Values from 0 (Better) to 100 (Worse)

Ciliary hyperemiaChange from Baseline Ciliary Hyperemia at 2 months.

Values from 0 (Better) to 100 (Worse)

Ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire.Change from Baseline OSDI at 2 months.

Values from 0 (Better) to 100 (Worse)

Tear meniscus area (TMA)Change from Baseline TMA at 2 months.
Noninvasive tear film break-up time (NIBUT).Change from Baseline NIBUT at 2 months.
Meibomian glands Loss area (LAMG)Change from Baseline LAMG at 2 months.

Values from 0 (Better) to 100 (Worse)

Ocular surface staining (OSS).Change from Baseline OSS at 2 months.

Values from 0 (Better) to 4 (Worse)

Meibomian gland Dysfunction Grade (MGD Grade)Change from Baseline MGD grade at 2 months.

Values from 0 (Better) to 4 (Worse)

Lipid Layer Grade (LLG)Change from Baseline LLG at 2 months.

Values from 0 (Better) to 4 (Worse)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Novovision ophthalmologic clinic

🇪🇸

Murcia, Spain

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath