MedPath

Ultrasonography Guided Pneumoperitoneum for Laparoscopic Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patients

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Pneumoperitoneum
Morbid Obesity
Bariatric Surgery Candidate
Interventions
Procedure: Ultrasonography guided Veress needle insertion for creating pneumoperitoneum
Procedure: Veress needle will be inserted blindly as a closed technique for creating pneumoperitoneum
Registration Number
NCT06413264
Lead Sponsor
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar
Brief Summary

Bariatric Surgery for morbid obesity is indicated when BMI \> 40 kg/m2 without comorbidities or BMI \> 35 kg/m2 with co-morbidities. Different surgeries performed for obesity are classified as restrictive, malabsorptive, and hybrid procedures.

Because laparoscopic surgery has increased the interest and growth of bariatric surgery, soaring demand for laparoscopic bariatric surgery from patients has boosted the boom in bariatric surgery worldwide.

Achieving pneumoperitoneum is the initial and one of the most crucial steps in any laparoscopic surgery, giving the surgeon working space to operate on a particular organ/organ system. Usually, pneumoperitoneum is achieved either by a closed technique with a veress needle or an open technique with many variations like finger assisted or the conventional open technique.

Given the excess amount of subcutaneous fat in morbidly obese patients, putting a veress needle to achieve pneumoperitoneum successfully is particularly challenging which takes a toll on the operating surgeon when he/she is trying to locate the midline one can either overshoot to cause omental emphysema or undershoot getting lost in the subcutaneous fat. It is usually done in the supra umbilical area. Sometimes, due to previous surgical scars other sites are preferred.

Sonography is routinely used by radiologists with negligible radiation exposure. Anesthesiologists in the operating room have used it for many assisted procedures like central line insertion / giving nerve blocks. It can also be used in obese patients undergoing metabolic surgery to assist in creating pneumoperitoneum by a veress needle.

Advantages of Intraoperative ultrasonography in this particular study :

1. To quantify the thickness of subcutaneous fat

2. To visualise the linea alba and guide the veress needle safely into the peritoneal cavity

3. Real-time visualisation of the pneumoperitoneum created

4. Avoid complications like omental emphysema, bowel or vascular injury

Detailed Description

All patients above the age of 18 years with morbid obesity planned for Laparoscopic bariatric surgery will be considered for inclusion in the study. The patient will be explained about the study and asked to sign an informed consent form. The patient's eligibility for the study will be checked by a competent radiologist through pre-operative ultrasonography. All patients will undergo metabolic surgery by a single competent surgeon per the standard operating protocol under general anaesthesia. A single dose of prophylactic antibiotic will be administered 30 minutes before the incision, the patient will be well strapped, and the port sites will be measured and marked. In group A, Ultrasonography will be used to locate the midline precisely and for subsequent puncturing with a Veress needle to enter the peritoneal cavity and the pneumoperitoneum created under real-time vision. In group B, the veress needle is inserted blindly, as regularly done in any other laparoscopic surgery, and the successful pneumoperitoneum is confirmed by percussion on the abdomen. Time taken and the number of attempts for achieving pneumoperitoneum and complications, if any, in both groups will be recorded by an independent assessor.

Sample size calculation :

There are no similar studies done before to assess the role of Ultrasonography in achieving pneumoperitoneum. Hence, the sample size was calculated for a pilot study, as per the recommendation of Sim J and Lewis M, considering precision, proportion, and efficiency. The trial was planned through a study of a continuous variable in two independent, Blind vs. USG guided Veress needle insertions to determine if the two study groups differ in the time taken to start pneumoperitoneum successfully.

The study used for calculating sample size :

Total sample size: 20 in each arm Blinding: Single blinded where only the patient is blinded

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • All patients in the age group of 18 -65 years undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery with weight >100 kg
  • Subcutaneous fat thickness of more than 5 cm as determined by pre-operative ultrasonography
  • BMI > 40 kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients who don't give consent and do not understand the nature of the study
  • Patients undergoing a re-do surgery

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
USG-guided Veress needle insertionUltrasonography guided Veress needle insertion for creating pneumoperitoneumUltrasonography-guided Veress needle will be inserted, and a real-time pneumoperitoneum will be created as the first step of a laparoscopic bariatric surgical procedure. The bariatric procedures include laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass procedures. The ultrasound's high-frequency (10-13Hz) linear probe will be used peri-operatively to identify the planes of the abdominal wall. Once the Veress needle is successfully inserted into the peritoneal cavity in real-time visualisation and pneumoperitoneum created, thereafter the bariatric procedures will be continued as routinely done.
Blind Veress needle insertionVeress needle will be inserted blindly as a closed technique for creating pneumoperitoneumThe Veress needle is inserted blindly, as regularly done in any other laparoscopic surgery, and the successful pneumoperitoneum is confirmed by aspiration of the needle, saline drop test and percussion on the abdomen.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time taken to successfully insert the Veress needle (supra umbilical) into the peritoneal cavity in both arms.Time taken till the Veress needle tip enters the peritoneal cavity (Maximum allowed time up to 2 minutes). Beyond the time, the Veress needle to be attempted insertion at other sites, including the Palmer's point.

The time in seconds between the first attempt to insert the Veress needle into the peritoneal cavity and the onset of successful pneumoperitoneum (confirmed by either ultrasonography/saline drop/percussion) in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric procedures. A comparison of the time taken to successfully place the Veress needle in the peritoneal cavity by ultrasonography-guided insertion and by blind technique will be made.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of attempts to successful Veress needle insertionVeress needle tip enters the peritoneal cavity (Upto maximum 3 attempts within 2 minutes). Beyond the number of attempts or time, the Veress needle to be attempted insertion at other sites, including the Palmer's point.

The number of attempts of Veress needle insertion made before successful intraperitoneal placement (confirmed by either ultrasonography/saline drop/percussion) in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric procedures. A comparison of the number of attempts of Veress needle insertion to successfully place it in the peritoneal cavity by ultrasonography-guided insertion and by the blind technique will be made.

Incidences of complications out of Veress needle insertion for creating pneumoperitoneumAt the beginning of the laparoscopic surgical procedure, during the diagnostic laparoscopy, the complications (omental emphysema, bowel /vascular injury), if any inadvertently done will be recorded

To compare the incidence of complications like omental emphysema, bowel injury and vascular injury.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

All India Institute of Medical Sciences

🇮🇳

Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath