跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01542957
NCT01542957已完成不适用

Cognitive Therapy for Unipolar Depression: Efficacy of a Dilemma-Focused Intervention

University of Barcelona8 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 128 人开始时间: 2011年11月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
128
试验地点
8
主要终点
Change From Baseline in Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) at the End of Therapy, 3 and 12-month Follow-up

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of a brief psychological intervention focused on the personal dilemmas identified for each depressive patient. For that, this intervention is combined to group cognitive therapy (an already proven efficacious format) and compared to cognitive individual therapy.

详细描述

Depression is one of the more severe and serious health problems because of its morbidity, disabling effects and for its societal and economic burden. Despite the variety of existing pharmacological and psychological treatments most of the cases evolve with only partial remission, relapse and recurrence.

Cognitive models made a significant contribution in the understanding of unipolar depression and its psychological treatment. Even though, success is only partial and many authors affirm the need to improve those models and also the treatment programs derived from them. One of the issues that requires further elaboration is the difficulty these patients experience in responding to treatment and in maintaining therapeutic gains across time without relapse or recurrence.

Our research group has been working in the notion of cognitive conflict viewed as personal dilemma according to personal construct theory. The investigators use a novel method for identifying those conflicts using the repertory grid technique. Preliminary results with depressive patients show that more than 90% of them have one or more of those conflicts. This fact might explain the blockage and the difficult progress of these patients, especially the more severe and/or chronic. These results justify the need for specific interventions focused in the resolution of these internal conflicts.

This study aims to empirically test the hypothesis that an intervention focused on the dilemma(s) specifically detected for each patient will contribute to enhance the efficacy of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for depression. A therapy manual for this approach will be tested using a randomized clinical trial by comparing the outcome of two treatment conditions: a CBT treatment package and another package combining cognitive-behavioral and dilemma-focused interventions. The investigators expect that this combined package will increase the efficacy of CBT, one of the more prestigious therapies for depression, this resulting in a significant contribution for its treatment.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Meeting diagnostic criteria for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) or Dysthymic Disorder (DD) according to the DSM-IV-TR (APA, 2002) criteria a assessed using SCID-I
  • A score above 19 on the BDI-II Questionnaire
  • Presenting at leat one cognitive conflict (implicative dilemma or dilemmatic construct) as assessed using the Repertory Grid Technique
  • Enough level of competence to communicate in Spanish or Catalan

排除标准

  • Bipolar disorders
  • Psychotic symptoms
  • Substance abuse
  • Organic brain dysfunction
  • Mental retardation
  • Serious suicidal ideation
  • Receiving psychological treatment (unless it is suspended at the time of inclusion in the study itself, in agreement with the patient and the practitioner applying it)
  • Substantial visual, hearing or cognitive deficits

结局指标

主要结局

Change From Baseline in Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) at the End of Therapy, 3 and 12-month Follow-up

时间窗: End of therapy (16 weeks), 3 and 12-month follow-up

To assess change in severity of depressive symptoms. The Total score is reported, which is the sum of the ratings of all items and ranges from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating more severity of depressive symptoms.

次要结局

  • Change From Baseline in Hamilton-Depression Rating Scale-17 Items(End of therapy and 12-month follow-up)
  • Change From Baseline in Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) at the End of Therapy, 3 and12 Month Follow-up(End of therapy, 3 and 12 month follow-up)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr. Guillem Feixas

Professor

University of Barcelona

研究点 (8)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Cognitive Therapy for Unipolar Depression: Efficacy... | 临床试验