MedPath

FOCUS: PCC + Bevacizumab + CA4P Versus PCC + Bevacizumab + Placebo for Subjects With Platinum Resistant Ovarian Cancer

Phase 2
Terminated
Conditions
Platinum Resistant Ovarian Cancer
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT02641639
Lead Sponsor
Mateon Therapeutics
Brief Summary

This is a multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, 2-arm, parallel-group, Phase 2/3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PCC plus bevacizumab and CA4P versus PCC plus bevacizumab and placebo in subjects with platinum-resistant ovarian cancers (prOC). Subjects with platinum-resistant, recurrent, epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer will be randomized 1:1 to receive PCC plus bevacizumab and CA4P or PCC plus bevacizumab and placebo. Subjects will be stratified by selected chemotherapy (PLD vs. paclitaxel), platinum free interval (\< 3 vs. 3 to 6 months from last platinum therapy to subsequent progression), and line of therapy (2nd vs. 3rd). This is a 2-part study, consisting of a Phase 2, exploratory study (Part 1) followed by a Phase 3, pivotal study (Part 2). Both parts of the study will have similar overall design. Approximately 80 subjects will be randomized into Part 1 and approximately 356 subjects will be randomized into Part 2.

Detailed Description

This is a multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, 2-arm, parallel-group, Phase 2/3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PCC plus bevacizumab and CA4P versus PCC plus bevacizumab and placebo in subjects with platinum-resistant ovarian cancers (prOC). Subjects with platinum-resistant, recurrent, epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer will be randomized 1:1 to receive PCC plus bevacizumab and CA4P or PCC plus bevacizumab and placebo. Subjects will be stratified by selected chemotherapy (PLD vs. paclitaxel), platinum free interval (\< 3 vs. 3 to 6 months from last platinum therapy to subsequent progression), and line of therapy (2nd vs. 3rd). This is a 2-part study, consisting of a Phase 2, exploratory study (Part 1) followed by a Phase 3, pivotal study (Part 2). Both parts of the study will have similar overall design. Approximately 80 subjects will be randomized into Part 1 and approximately 356 subjects will be randomized into Part 2.

All subjects randomized will receive bevacizumab 10 mg/kg intravenously (IV) on Days 1 and 15, repeated every 4 weeks (q4wk) and PCC with paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22, repeated q4wk, or paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV on Days 1, 8, 15, repeated q4wk or PLD 40 mg/m2 IV on Day 1, repeated q4wk. Subjects in the Treatment Arm will also receive CA4P 60 mg/m2 on the same day as bevacizumab (Days 1 and 15, repeated q4wk), while subjects in the Control Arm will receive placebo on those days.

Order of dosing will follow the guidance listed below during this study when bevacizumab and CA4P / Placebo are dosed the same day as PCC,

* Bevacizumab followed by CA4P / Placebo followed after 1-3 hours by paclitaxel,

* PLD followed by bevacizumab followed by CA4P / Placebo Subjects will continue randomized treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, investigator decision, withdrawal of consent, or sponsor discontinues study for any reason. Subjects will undergo tumor assessments (RECIST) at baseline and every 8 weeks and CA-125 levels at baseline and every 4 weeks.

The primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints include ORR, OS, proportion of subjects who remain progression free at 6, 9, and 12 months, and safety. Endpoints will be compared between the Treatment Arm and the Control arm. The study duration is estimated to last approximately 3 years.

This study will have 2 parts with the same overall design. Part 1 will enroll up to approximately 80 subjects and will include multiple interim analyses to test the safety and efficacy assumptions in this specific subject population. Upon meeting certain efficacy criteria in Part 1, the protocol will be amended and additional sites added in order to enroll an additional 356 subjects into Part 2 of the study. Subjects enrolled in Part 2 will be analyzed separately and used as a stand-alone confirmatory efficacy study.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
70
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
PlaceboPlaceboPhysician's choice chemotherapy (weekly Paclitaxel or Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin \[PLD\]) plus bevacizumab and placebo
Fosbretabulin tromethamineFosbretabulin tromethaminePhysician's choice chemotherapy (weekly Paclitaxel or Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin \[PLD\]) plus bevacizumab and CA4P
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Progression Free Survival12 Months

The primary efficacy parameter in this study is statistically meaningful PFS, defined as the time from the date of randomization until patient discontinuation or death from any cause.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Improvement in Objective Response Rate12 Months

Improvement in objective response rate (ORR). The ORR will be defined as the proportion of subjects with a confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR) per RECIST 1.1 criteria, based upon the best response. The ORR will be determined based on investigator assessment according to RECIST 1.1 criteria and/or GCIG CA-125 criteria.

Overall Survival (OS)12 Months

Evaluation of overall survival (OS)

Proportion of Subjects Who Remain Progression-free at 12 Months12 Months

Assessment of the proportion of subjects who remain progression-free at 12 months on the regimen of PCC plus bevacizumab and CA4P compared with PCC plus bevacizumab and placebo

Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Safety and Tolerability) of PCC Plus Bevacizumab and CA4P Versus PCC Plus Bevacizumab and Placebo12 Months

To evaluate the Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of PCC plus bevacizumab and CA4P versus PCC plus bevacizumab and placebo as measured by aggregate reporting of the number of patient with abnormal findings on (physical exams, vital signs, laboratory measures, ECG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS)) and/or analysis of the incidence of adverse events (AEs) using the National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) version 4.03.

Trial Locations

Locations (37)

University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Mitchell Cancer Institute - USA Health System

🇺🇸

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Arizona Oncology Associates, PC - HAL

🇺🇸

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Arizona Oncology Associates, PC - HOPE

🇺🇸

Tucson, Arizona, United States

University of Arizona Cancer Center

🇺🇸

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation

🇺🇸

Lynwood, California, United States

University of California Irvine

🇺🇸

Orange, California, United States

California Pacific Medical Center, Research Institute

🇺🇸

San Francisco, California, United States

Sansum Clinic

🇺🇸

Santa Barbara, California, United States

Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, LLP

🇺🇸

Lakewood, Colorado, United States

Scroll for more (27 remaining)
University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center
🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.