Cardiac Power Output in Cardiogenic Shock Patients
- Conditions
- Cardiogenic ShockHeart Failure
- Registration Number
- NCT05700617
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Chicago
- Brief Summary
The main purpose of this study is to determine whether differences in myocardial reserve predict clinical outcomes for heart failure patients.
- Detailed Description
This study is designed as a prospective, observational, crossover study to assess the feasibility of using differences in invasive hemodynamics of cardiac function, representing myocardial reserve, to predict clinical outcomes for heart failure patients. Patients with heart failure referred for right heart catheterization (RHC) by the advanced heart failure team as part of 1) evaluation for advanced heart failure therapies, including left ventricular assist device (LVAD), orthotopic heart transplant (OHT), temporary or long-term inotrope therapy, or counter-pulsation (temporary intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or long-term with NuPulse device), 2) for accurate assessment of invasive hemodynamics due to worsening clinical status, 3) assessment of myocardial recovery for consideration of LVAD or NuPulse decommissioning or removal or mechanical circulatory support removal, or 4) accurate assessment of cardiac function in patients with reduced LVEF prior to valve replacement for aortic insufficiency (AI) or mitral regurgitation (MR).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 5
-
LVEF ≤ 40%
-
Referred for RHC for:
- Evaluation for advanced heart failure therapies, including LVAD, OHT, temporary or long-term inotrope therapy, or counter-pulsation (temporary or long-term with NuPulse device OR
- Accurate assessment of invasive hemodynamics due to worsening clinical status, OR
- Assessment of myocardial recovery for consideration of LVAD or counter-pulsation (temporary IABP or long-term with NuPulse device) decommissioning or removal OR
- Assessment of cardiac function and valvular abnormalities prior to planned valvular surgery for MR or AI
-
Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 30 ml/min/1.73 m2
-
Age ≥ 18 years-old
-
Intent for admission based on RHC data
- eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2
- Severe, non-revascularized coronary artery disease
- Concurrent acute coronary syndrome
- Age < 18 years-old
- History of significant ventricular arrhythmia without an ICD
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Cardiac output measurement using a pulmonary artery (PA) catheter measuring mmHg at 2 years 2 years Efficacy of increasing cardiac output with milrinone compared to dobutamine using changes invasive hemodynamics in 5 patients using a pulmonary artery (PA) catheter:
Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP mmHg), Right Atrial pressure (RA mmHg), Pulmonary Atrial pressures (PA mmHg),Changes in invasive hemodynamics using a pulmonary artery (PA) catheter measuring mmHg Baseline and 6,12,24,36,72 Hours post-inotrope challenge. Changes invasive hemodynamics representing myocardial reserve will be measured in 5 patients using a pulmonary artery (PA) catheter:
Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP mmHg); Right Atrial pressure (RA mmHg); Pulmonary Atrial pressures (PA mmHg);Advanced heart failure therapy 2 years Duration of time without need for definitive advanced heart failure therapy (LVAD, OHT) or death.
Death 2 years Cardiovascular death and/or all-cause mortality
Changes in invasive hemodynamics using a pulmonary artery (PA) catheter measuring L/min/m2 Baseline and 6,12,24,36,72 Hours post-inotrope challenge. Changes invasive hemodynamics representing myocardial reserve will be measured in 5 patients using a pulmonary artery (PA) catheter:
Cardiac output by Fick (CO L/min/m2); Cardiac index by Fick (CI L/min/m2).Cardiac output measurement using a pulmonary artery (PA) catheter measuring CO L/min/m2 at 2 years 2 years Efficacy of increasing cardiac output with milrinone compared to dobutamine using changes invasive hemodynamics in 5 patients using a pulmonary artery (PA) catheter:
Cardiac output by Fick (CO L/min/m2), Cardiac index by Fick (CI L/min/m2.)Inotropes 2 years Duration of time on inotropes during hospitalization
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method LVAD decommissioning measuring L/min/m2 2 years If a patient is enrolled in the study that has an left ventricular assist device (LVAD) decommissioning or removal (not due to open heart transplant, pump malfunction, or death) the following will be assessed:
A. Changes in invasive hemodynamics using a pulmonary artery (PA) catheter:
1. Cardiac output by Fick (CO L/min/m2)
2. Cardiac index by Fick (CI L/min/m2)
B. Myocardial reserve (i.e. cardiac power output, aortic pulsatility index, Cardiac output by Fick (CO L/min/m2) Cardiac index by Fick (CI L/min/m2)) after inotrope challenge.
C. Association of myocardial reserve with other known variables of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality.LVAD decommissioning measuring mmHg 2 years If a patient is enrolled in the study that has an left ventricular assist device (LVAD) decommissioning or removal (not due to open heart transplant, pump malfunction, or death) the following will be assessed:
A. Changes in invasive hemodynamics using a pulmonary artery (PA) catheter:
Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP mmHg) Right Atrial pressure (RA mmHg) Pulmonary Atrial pressures (PA mmHg)Durable support 72 hours Duration of time successfully off of counterpulsation, LVAD, or ECMO support
Hospital discharge Up to 12 weeks Hospital discharge without LVAD, OHT, home-inotropes, long-term counter-pulsation device (i.e NuPulse), or death.
Patients will be monitored at the the following timepoints while admitted in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU) 12 Hours 24 Hours 36 Hours 48 Hours 72 HoursHome inotropic 2 years Duration of time on home inotropic agents
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
The University of Chicago
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States