Cerebral Palsy Upper Extremity Orthotic Device

Not Applicable

Recruiting

• Conditions: Cerebral Palsy
• Interventions: Other: Occupational Therapy; Device: Upper Extremity Orthotic

• Registration Number: NCT05024409
• Lead Sponsor: Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Brief Summary

Upper extremity therapies for children with cerebral palsy (CP) have been validated for improving function in higher functioning patients. Those who function at the lowest end of the scale, on the Manual Ability Classification System scale (MACS) III-V, comprise 34-54% of the population, but as yet have no evidence-based interventions specific to their needs. Lower functioning children often retain some voluntary control of the elbow in spite of limited finger motion. A dynamic splint, or exoskeleton, could utilize the tenodesis effect from elbow motion to drive finger release while retaining flexor tone for grasp, potentially creating a portable, home-based therapeutic tool. The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of an upper extremity orthotic device in improving the upper extremity function of children with cerebral palsy who have limited use of their hands.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2021-08-03
• Study First Submitted QC: 2021-08-26
• Study First Posted: 2021-08-27
• Study Start: 2023-01-01
• Status Verified: 2023-12
• Last Update Submitted: 2023-12-21
• Last Update Posted: 2023-12-26
• Primary Completion: 2025-09-01
• Study Completion: 2025-12-01

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 36

Inclusion Criteria

• diagnosis of cerebral palsy, age 4-17 years, moderate-severe hand disability as graded by the Manual Ability Classification System, active movement of the elbow, ability to follow commands and participate in goal-making and repetitive tasks

Exclusion Criteria

• mild or extremely severe hand disability, Botox or orthopaedic surgery within the past 6 months, severe contractures, lack of voluntary arm motion, unable to follow commands due to severe cognitive impairment

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Occupational Therapy alone	Occupational Therapy	-
Orthotic + Occupational Therapy	Upper Extremity Orthotic	-

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change in Melbourne Assessment-2 from 1) pre to post treatment; 2) post treatment to 3 month followup, and 3) pre treatment to 3 mos after cessation of treatment	through study completion, an average of 6 months	The Melbourne Assessment 2 (MA2) is a valid and reliable criterion-referenced test for evaluating four elements of upper limb movement quality in children with a neurological impairment aged 2.5 to 15 years: (i) Range of movement, (ii) Accuracy of reach and placement, (iii) Dexterity of grasp, release and manipulation and (iv) Fluency of movement.; The full test comprises 14 test items which require a child to reach to, grasp, release and manipulate simple objects. Each child's test performance is video recorded for subsequent scoring.; Scoring is completed across the 30 score items using a three, four or five point scale and individually defined scoring criteria. Item scores relating to each element of movement measured are summed within the corresponding sub-scale. A raw score scale change of 3 for range of motion, dexterity, and fluency; and a change of 4 for accuracy is considered clinically significant.
Change in range of motion for shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, and fingers from 1) pre to post treatment; 2) post treatment to 3 month followup, and 3) pre treatment to 3 mos after cessation of treatment	pre treatment, immediate post treatment, and 3 month followup
Change in Assisting Hand Assessment from 1) pre to post treatment; 2) post treatment to 3 month followup, and 3) pre treatment to 3 mos after cessation of treatment	through study completion, an average of 6 months	The Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) is a test of hand function in children with difficulties using one of their hands. The AHA measures how effectively the affected hand and arm is used in bimanual performance. An assessment is performed by observing the child's spontaneous handling of toys in a relaxed and playful session. The scale is 0-100, and a higher score indicates better function. A change of +5 is clinically significant.
Change in Children's Hand Use Experience Questionnaire from 1) pre to post treatment; 2) post treatment to 3 month followup, and 3) pre treatment to 3 mos after cessation of treatment	through study completion, an average of 6 months	CHEQ is a newly developed questionnaire. It has been developed for children and adolescents with decreased function in one hand, for example hemiplegic CP, obstetric brachial plexus palsy (OBPP) and upper limb reduction deficiency, and for their parents. The scale is 0-100, with the higher score indicating better abilities.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change in motion analysis parameters from 1) pre to post treatment; 2) post treatment to 3 month followup, and 3) pre treatment to 3 mos after cessation of treatment	pre treatment, immediate post treatment

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Rutgers NJMS; 🇺🇸 Newark, New Jersey, United States

Children's Specialized Hospital; 🇺🇸 Union, New Jersey, United States