MedPath

Comprehensive Imaging of Perforator Vessels and Subcutaneous Vascular Network With No-Exogenous Contrast and Non-Ionizing-Radiation Magnetic Resonance Angiography

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Perforator Flap Surgery
Interventions
Device: MRI Scan
Registration Number
NCT03567018
Lead Sponsor
University of Cincinnati
Brief Summary

In this study the investigators plan to enroll a total of 25 evaluable volunteers (volunteer population) for the development and optimization of perforator imaging protocols and 50 evaluable clinical patients receiving flap procedures at OSUMC for the clinical validation of the optimized protocol. No extrinsic MR contrast agent will be injected. Clinical patients' MRI images will be evaluated independently by radiologists and plastic surgeons and compared to the clinical CTA images.

Detailed Description

The overall objective of this pilot study is to develop and optimize preoperative MRA imaging protocols for various perforators commonly used in flap surgery with phantoms and healthy volunteers and to obtain clinical validation of the optimized protocols with a group of patients receiving flap surgery at The OSU Wexmer Medical Center. Data obtained in this study may also serve as the basis for statistical planning of future clinical trials. Based on previous experience with other magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques, the investigators hypothesize that optimal MRA images can only be obtained with a carefully selected combination of imaging hardware, acquisition, and postprocessing factors. The main objective of this pilot study is to determine this optimal combination through the comparison of image between different combinations. The secondary objective of this pilot study is to evaluate, both qualitatively and quantitatively, the quality of the optimized MRA images and compare them with clinical CTA images. The primary hypothesis is that the quality of the optimized MRA images is at least comparable to that of the CTA images. The quantitative measurements obtained from this pilot population will also serve as the preliminary data for future studies and be used in statistical calculations that determine their study population.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
23
Inclusion Criteria
  • greater than or equal to 18 years at time of enrollment
  • able to provide informed consent
  • able to lie in both prone and supine positions for at least 30 minutes
  • the clinical patients need to have a flap procedure scheduled at the Ohio State University Medical Center within the next 24 months
Exclusion Criteria
  • Use of an IUD (intrauterine device) or medical patch
  • Subjects with any type of activatable implants (e.g. cardiac pacemakers, deep brain stimulators, spinal cord stimulators, cochlear implants, electronic infusion pumps, etc.)
  • Subjects with any type of metallic implants or foreign objects in torso region (e.g. cardiac stents, surgical clips, shrapnel fragments from war wounds, etc.)
  • metal works and machinists (who may have metallic fragments in or near the eyes)
  • severe auto accident victims
  • subjects with permanent tattoos that may contain metallic coloring
  • subjects with previous history of perforator flap surgery
  • subjects who cannot communicate with the researcher for any reason
  • claustrophobia

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Patient populationMRI ScanWe plan to enroll 50 clinical patients who are receiving flap procedures at the Ohio State Medical Center.
Healthy volunteer populationMRI ScanWe plan to enroll 25 healthy volunteers.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
image qualitythrough study completion, on average 2-5 years

assessed by blinded readers

Vessel detectability in MRI assessed by experienced readersthrough study completion, on average 2-5 years

assessed by blinded readers

Artifacts in MRI images assessed by experienced readersthrough study completion, on average 2-5 years

assessed by blinded readers

Image noise as a measure of image quality assessed by quantitative measuresthrough study completion, on average 2-5 years

assessed region of interest over target tissue and background

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) to muscle and fatBaseline

ROI based assessment

Perforator branching pattern60 min

Location on images

Anatomy accuracy60 min

Location on images

Vascular network continuity60 min

Location on images

Potential Clinical Use of the MRI Images for Clinical Decision makingBaseline

Clinical reader assessment

Perforator size60 min

Location on images

Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)Baseline

ROI based assessment

Length of perforator intramuscular course60 min

Location on images

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

The Ohio State University Hospital

🇺🇸

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Martha Morehouse Medical Plaza

🇺🇸

Columbus, Ohio, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath