MedPath

Different Designs of Space Maintainer

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Early Tooth Exfoliation
Interventions
Device: Fixed space maintainer
Registration Number
NCT05693870
Lead Sponsor
Mansoura University
Brief Summary

Purpose: Evaluation of survival rate for three space maintainers (SMs) of different designs versus standard one.

Methods: 52 extraction sites in children of age group of 4-7 years with prematurely-lost 1st primary molar were selected for this study. The whole sample was divided into four groups (13 each). In Group I, Band and loop (B\&L), Group II: Single-sided band and loop (Ss B\&L), Group III: Direct bonded wire (DBW), Group IV: Tube and loop (T\&L). children were recalled at 3, 6, 9, 12,15-month.

Detailed Description

Purpose: Evaluation of survival rate for three space maintainers (SMs) of different designs versus standard one.

Methods: 52 extraction sites in children of age group of 4-7 years with prematurely-lost 1st primary molar were selected for this study. The whole sample was divided into four groups (13 each). In Group I, Band and loop (B\&L), Group II: Single-sided band and loop (Ss B\&L), Group III: Direct bonded wire (DBW), Group IV: Tube and loop (T\&L). children were recalled at 3, 6, 9, 12,15-month. Cumulative survival rates of SMs were estimated by means of Kaplan-Meier method with log rank test. Cumulative survival rates of SMs were estimated by means of Kaplan-Meier method with log rank test. Sample size: The total sample size was calculated using Sampsize application with anticipated success on treatment with conventional band and loop 86% , anticipated response on treatment with direct bonded wire 33% 12, at 80% power, and significant level 0.05.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
52
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Children and their parents showed cooperation and compliance.
  2. Extraction of the first primary molar was not exceeding three months.
  3. Angle's class 1 occlusion with normal deciduous molar relation
  4. Child not complaining from any systemic disease.
  5. The extraction space was of only one missing first deciduous molar with remaining teeth present on mesial and distal side of extraction space.
  6. Absence of para-functional habits or abnormal occlusion conditions such as crossbite, open bite, deep bite.
  7. No restorative application on the buccal surfaces of abutment teeth, otherwise extra-coronal complete coverage, as stainless-steel crown, was applied only in banded groups.
  8. Radiographically, presence of permanent successor.
  9. Absence of any pathological evidence on the eruption track of the permanent tooth.
  10. Ability to attend follow-up appointments as required.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Child complaining from any systemic disease.
  2. Prescence of para-functional habits or abnormal occlusion conditions such as crossbite, open bite, deep bite
  3. Extraction of the first primary molar was exceeding three months.
  4. The extraction space resulted from more than one missing deciduous molar
  5. Radiographically, absence of permanent successor.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Group III (DBW)Fixed space maintainer13 Direct Bonded Wire (DBW) appliance were included in group three
Group II (Ssb&l)Fixed space maintainer13 Single-sided Band and loop (SsB\&L) appliance were included in group two
Group IV(T&L)Fixed space maintainer13 Tube and Loop (T\&L) appliance were included in group four
Group I (B&L)Fixed space maintainer13 Band and loop (B\&L) appliance were included in group one
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Median survival rate15 months

Cumulative survival rates of space maintainers were estimated by means of Kaplan-Meier method with log rank test

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Mansoura University

🇪🇬

Mansoura, Dakahleya Governorate, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath