MedPath

Comparison of new generation Baska mask with I-gel in elective surgery under general anaesthesia in terms of difference in oropharyngeal seal pressure, ease of insertion, leak fraction and hemodynamic changes.

Phase 4
Conditions
Health Condition 1: Z469- Encounter for fitting and adjustment of unspecified deviceHealth Condition 2: O- Medical and Surgical
Registration Number
CTRI/2024/04/066201
Lead Sponsor
Dr Abhishek Joshi
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ot Yet Recruiting
Sex
Not specified
Target Recruitment
0
Inclusion Criteria

Patient belonging to American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status (ASA) I and II, who are scheduled for routine surgeries under general anaesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient’s refusal,

2. Mouth opening of less than 3 fingers or with difficult airway,

3. Body mass index (BMI) more than 35 Kg/m2,

4. Patients with neck pathology

5. Pregnant females,

6. Patients at increased risk of gastric aspiration.

7. Laparoscopic surgery

8. Emergency surgery

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To compare oropharyngeal seal pressure (OLP) while using I-Gel and Baska mask at various time intervalsTimepoint: To compare oropharyngeal seal pressure (OLP) while using I-Gel and Baska mask at various time intervals for 30 minutus
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To compare the ease of insertion of each device in terms of time taken and number of attempts per device insertion. <br/ ><br>To compare leak fraction by using either I-Gel or Baska mask. <br/ ><br>To compare the hemodynamic changes using either device at various time intervals <br/ ><br>Any post-operative complications like hoarseness, sore throat or dysphagia.Timepoint: Immediately after insertion and every 5 minutes till 30 minutes
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath