Daily Wear Comparison of Enhanced and Non-Enhanced Silicone Hydrogel Lenses
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Myopia
- Interventions
- Device: Lotrafilcon A Commercial Contact LensDevice: Lotrafilcon A Experimental Contact Lens
- Registration Number
- NCT00813982
- Lead Sponsor
- CIBA VISION
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare an experimental contact lens with a currently marketed contact lens.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
Inclusion Criteria
- Able to wear contact lenses for a minimum of 5 days a week, at least 8 hours a day
- On exam have ocular findings that are considered normal and would not prevent the safe wear of contact lenses
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Exclusion Criteria
- Requires concurrent ocular medication
- Eye injury or surgery within twelve weeks immediately prior to enrollment
- Evidence of systemic or ocular abnormality, infection, or disease likely to affect successful wear of contact lenses or use of their accessory solutions
- Any active corneal infection
- Any use of medications for which contact lens wear would be contraindicated
- History of corneal refractive surgery
- Wears toric contact lenses
- Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Commercial Lotrafilcon A Contact Lens Lotrafilcon A Commercial Contact Lens Lotrafilcon A commercial contact lens randomly assigned to one eye Experimental Lotrafilcon A Contact Lens Lotrafilcon A Experimental Contact Lens Lotrafilcon A experimental contact lens randomly assigned to one eye
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Overall Vision 1 week Overall vision was interpreted by the subject and recorded on a questionnaire as a single, retrospective evaluation of 1-week wear time. Overall vision was evaluated by eye and rated on a 10-point scale, with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method