Clinical Performance Of Lithium Disilicate Crowns Restoring Endodontically Treated Teeth With Two Occlusal Preparation Schemes
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Enrollment
- 40
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Measuring number of Fracture
Study Overview
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of lithium disilicate crowns restoring endodontically treated teeth with two occlusal preparation schemes.
Detailed Description
Statement of the problem:
The endodontically treated teeth need to be restored back to form, function and aesthetics. The quality of the coronal restoration will directly impact on their survival and success. The aim of the coronal restoration of endodontically treated teeth is to provide the necessary strength for the restoration/tooth complex through tooth preparation in order to withstand functional stress and prevent crown and/or root fracture. The use of ceramic crowns has increased substantially in recent years because of their superior esthetics and high mechanical properties. Long term success of all ceramic crowns is affected by many factors and the failure patterns of these all ceramic crowns should be inspected closely to detect their clinical performance.
Rationale for carrying out the trial:
Endodontic treatment weakens posterior teeth and ought to be covered by crowns.The capability of these crowns to bear load relies on the preparation of an appropriate design and the selection of a crown material with adequate fracture strength and thickness. In vital teeth, the anatomic occlusal preparation design is followed such that the occlusal surface is reduced uniformly, maintaining the cusps and normal inclined planes but at a reduced height. This aids in minimizing the risk of pulp injury. In contrast, in non-vital teeth, this design can be modified such that the occlusal surface is prepared in two planes (buccal and lingual planes). A flat prepared occlusal surface provides less quantitative and better qualitative stresses when compared to an anatomically prepared surface
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 20 Years to 50 Years (Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •Have no active periodontal diseases or periapical pathosis
- •No tooth mobility or furcation involvement with sufficient occluso-gingival height
- •Psychologically and physically able to withstand conventional dental procedures
- •Patients with good endodontically treated teeth indicated for full coverage restorations
- •Able to return for follow-up examination and evaluation
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patient with active resistant periodontal diseases
- •Patients with poor oral hygiene and uncooperative
- •Pregnant women that won't be able to come for follow-up visits
- •Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth
- •Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations
- •Lack of opposing dentition in the area of interest
- •Patients with poor root canal treatment
- •Patients with parafunctional habits (eg. Bruxism)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Measuring number of Fracture
Time Frame: one year
using USPHS criteria for clinical evaluation
Secondary Outcomes
- Presence of Caries(one year)
- Degree of Marginal adaptation(one year)
- Degree of Marginal discoloration(one year)
Investigators
Marwa Salem
Assistant lecturer
Cairo University