A Pilot Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education on Pain Intensity, Patients' Attitudes and Beliefs About Pain, Disability and Quality of Life After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Rotator Cuff Injuries
- Sponsor
- Universidad Católica del Maule
- Enrollment
- 29
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Kinesiophobia
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 5 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a 8-week pain neuroscience education programme compared to a biomedical education programme on the rehabilitation of patients who undergo arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Outcome measures included pain intensity, patients' attitudes and beliefs about pain, disability and quality of life.
Detailed Description
This was a single-blinded, randomized parallel study. Twenty- nine patients who undergo arthroscopic rotator cuff repair took part in a multimodal physiotherapy programme and were allocated to two groups. Patients in the experimental group - PNE (n= 16) received multimodal physiotherapy along with pain neuroscience education, and the control group- PME (n=13) received multimodal physiotherapy along with biomedical education. The multimodal treatment included 1-hour sessions 3 times per week for 8 weeks (24 sessions). In addition, the education component (PNE, PME) consisted of 4 education sessions of 30 minutes duration, on a one-to-one basis, once per week at the start of the programme. Physiotherapists involved in the delivery of the interventions were previously trained on both, the theoretical and practical aspects related to the protocols of multimodal physiotherapy and specially on the education component. Outcome measures included pain intensity (pain intensity numerical rating score), catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, disability and quality of life.
Investigators
Jorge Fuentes
Principal investigator
Universidad Católica del Maule
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •People aged 30 to 59 years with shoulder pain for more than three months, with torn rotator cuff repaired by arthroscopy.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Subjects unable to understand, read or speak Spanish, or participated in a programme for psychological management of chronic pain, or presented with generalised pain.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Kinesiophobia
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of intervention (8 weeks)
Kinesiophobia was assessed using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11), a 44-point self-administered instrument with MCID established at 6.0 points
Change Pain intensity: visual analogue scale
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of intervention (8 weeks)
The visual analogue scales is a self-reporting measure of pain intensity. This involves asking patients to rate their pain intensity by selecting a point in a straight horizontal line of fixed length, usually 10 cm. The ends are defined as the extreme limits of the parameter to be measured orientated from the left (worst) to the right (best). The Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in subjects with shoulder pain is 2.2 cm.
Pain catastrophizing
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of intervention (8 weeks)
Pain catastrophic was assessed using the Patient Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), a 52-point self-administered instrument with MCID of 4.5 points.
Disability
Time Frame: From baseline to the end end of intervention (8 weeks)
The degree of disability was assessed with the QuickDASH questionnaire, a self-administered instrument which expresses the degree of disability as a percentage on a scale of 0-100%, with MCID of 8% in subjects with shoulder pain.
Health-related quality of life: 5-dimension EuroQol questionnaire
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of intervention (8 weeks)
The health-related quality of life was assessed with the 5-dimension EuroQol questionnaire, with MCID established on a scale of 0.03-0.52 in the population with musculoskeletal pain.