跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04360954
NCT04360954已完成不适用

Evaluation of Commerical Antibody Tests for COVID-19

Washington University School of Medicine1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 461 人开始时间: 2020年4月23日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
461
试验地点
1
主要终点
Test Sensitivity

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of several marketed commercial or prototype test kits for antibody to SARS-CoV-2. The focus will be on rapid-format, point-of-care antibody test kits that detect both IgM and IgG antibodies to recombinant viral proteins.

Note: No voluntary enrolment into this study will be conducted; all testing is to be conducted anonymously.

详细描述

Background

Molecular (RT-PCR) tests are currently the gold standard for diagnosis of COVID-19. They detect viral RNA and are a good marker for current infection and infectivity. However, these tests are expensive and in short supply. In advanced COVID-19 cases, virus concentration in the upper respiratory tract is often low, as the infection has spread to the lungs and viral RNA is sometimes undetectable by RT-PCR using nasal swaps. Antibody tests detect human antibodies to viral proteins in the blood or other body fluids. They could be useful for diagnosing current infections (slightly less sensitive than RT-PCR tests), and they remain positive after persons have recovered from the infection. Thus, antibody tests are expected to be useful for diagnosis of current infections, for verifying recent infections in persons who were not tested by RT-PCR when they were ill, and for documenting possible immunity to the virus. Antibody tests may be especially valuable for use in low and middle income countries that lack resources for widespread molecular testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Anticipated test sensitivity and specificity. Manufacturer data for several antibody tests claim that more than 90% of persons with COVID-19 (clinical symptoms and positive molecular tests) have positive antibody test results for IgM and/or IgG. They also claim specificity in the range of 93-95% for samples from persons who have not been exposed to SARS-CoV-2.

Availability of antibody tests. In recent months, many antibody tests have been developed and marketed. The Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND, closely linked to World Health Organization (WHO) and supported by a large grant from the United Kingdom government) in Geneva Switzerland reported that they had identified more than 70 such tests, and they shortlisted 27 tests for further evaluation. Of these, only one test produced in the USA (produced by Cellex) has received an emergency use authorization (EUA) from the US FDA, and no test has formal FDA approval. Antibody tests use different diagnostic platforms, but most tests use the SARS-CoV-2 S1protein, and a few tests also use the SARS-CoV-2 N protein. Few studies that independently evaluated the performance of these rapid antibody tests have been published to date in peer-reviewed journals. Therefore, more data are needed to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and value of these tests.

Methods

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Only
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Sera/plasma from patients who have been hospitalized and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2
  • Sera/plasma from people who have recovered from COVID-19
  • Sera/plasma from from healthy humans and persons with parasitic diseases

排除标准

  • Persons under the age of 18

结局指标

主要结局

Test Sensitivity

时间窗: 2020

Test sensitivity relative to RT-PCR for acute samples; sensitivity relative to ELISA for convalescent samples.

Test Specificity

时间窗: 2020

Percent positivity with pre-COVID samples

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Evaluation of Antibody Tests for COVID-19 | 临床试验