Comparison Between Two Treatments for Burning Mouth

Not Applicable

Completed

Interventions: Device: Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
Device: Low-Level Light Therapy

Brief Summary: Introduction: The management of patients with chronic burning mouth is a challenge in clinical dentistry. Objective: To compare the effect of Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in the treatment of burning mouth. Materials and Methods: Randomized clinical trial consisting of 25 patients with burning mouth who were treated by TENS (n=12) and by LLLT (n=13). Treatment was carried out weekly for 8 weeks. Two-way ANOVA was used to verify whether there was a significant difference between times T0 (baseline), T1 (after the 4th treatment session), T2 (after the 8th treatment session) and T3 (30 days after the end of treatment) in in relation to symptoms, analyzed using the Visual Analog Scale, unstimulated salivary flow, xerostomia and dysgeusia with TENS and LLLT interventions.

Detailed Description: Experimental group: 20 participants with burning mouth were submitted to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation using a device at a frequency of 50 Hertz with intensity modulated according to the patient's comfort ranging from 1 - 4 (pulse amplitude) with a duration of 25 minutes per session, with one session per week, totaling eight weeks of treatment at the end of the study. The device's self-adhesive electrodes were fixed on the participant's face, following the path of the trigeminal nerve branch on the side affected by pain and/or burning.

Control group: 20 participants with burning mouth underwent low power laser therapy with punctual applications of infrared laser (L2) (power of 100mW, 808 nm, 6 joules of energy/60 seconds) in the affected region, keeping one centimeter of distance between the points, until the entire area of the complaint was irradiated. being held one session per week, totaling eight weeks of treatment at the end of the study.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria

Patients aged 18 years or over
Patients with burning sensation in the oral mucosa or recurrent dysesthetics daily for more than 2 hours a day for more than 3 months, without clinically evident causal lesions (IHS, 2018) were included in the study, as well as those who presented hyposalivation or some systemic alteration that could be related to a burning sensation in the oral mucosa

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients who did not comply with the study treatment protocol.

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Grupo TENS	Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation	Participants with burning mouth underwent to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
Grupo LLLT	Low-Level Light Therapy	Participants with burning mouth underwent low-level laser therapy

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Painful Symptoms	Baseline (T0), after the 4th treatment session (4 weeks), after the 8th treatment session (8 weeks). ), 30 days after the end of treatment (8 weeks + 30 days).	Changes in the intensity of pain/burning was determined by Visual Analogue Scale. Possible scores range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Salivary Flow	Baseline (T0), after the 4th treatment session (4 weeks), after the 8th treatment session (8 weeks). ), 30 days after the end of treatment (8 weeks + 30 days	The unstimulated salivary flow rate will be determined by the ratio volume of saliva collected, expressed in millimeters per minute (ml/min).