MedPath

Comparison of Reduced Cuff-pressure of the Laryngeal Tube Under General Anesthesia

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Airway Morbidity
Interventions
Device: Reduce Cuff pressure
Registration Number
NCT02300337
Lead Sponsor
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
Brief Summary

Optimization the cuff pressure of the laryngeal tube (LT) in relation of the mechanical ventilation, and the reduction of potential leakage mucosal trauma. Comparison of the tightness of LT between the filling volume specified by the manufacturer (connectors are color coded syringe and blocker), 60cmH₂O, 50cmH₂O, 40cmH₂Ound 30cmH₂O. The measurement of the leakage occurs in ml / kg body weight.

Detailed Description

The ventilation of both cuffs of the laryngeal tube by using the color coding of syringe and connector is a simple, fast and easy way to stabilize the tube and secure seal against the surrounding tissue.

The user of this method has only knowledge of the volume (ml), with which the cuff is vented, but not over the cuff pressure (cmH₂O) itself.

Permanently high pressures can cause to a lesions to necrosis in the adjacent tissue, on the other hand, the material of the bulging cuff fits less well the anatomy of the patient, leading to leaks in the breathing circuit.

Studies of pediatric anesthesia show that on 40cmH₂O reduces the volume of the leak in the laryngeal mask airway by reducing the cuff pressure and the ventilation is improved in sequence.

In the proposed study, the volume of leakage at the fill volume specified by the manufacturer (color coding), 60cmH₂O, 50cmH₂O, 40cmH₂O and 30cmH₂O to be captured.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age ≥ 18 Years
  • No concurrent participation in another study
  • capacity to consent
  • Present written informed consent of the research participant
  • Elective surgery under general anesthesia
  • Height> 150cm
Exclusion Criteria
  • Age <18 years
  • Existing pregnancy
  • Lack of consent
  • inability to consent
  • emergency patients
  • Emergency situations in the context of a Difficult Airway Management
  • ASA classification> 3
  • situations where the possibility of accumulated gastric contents
  • Indications for intubation with endotracheal tube
  • Height <150cm
  • Participation in another study

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Reduce Cuff PressureReduce Cuff pressureCuff Pressure difference between inspiration and expiration is measured.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparison of Leakage between the different Cuff Pressure< 5 Minutes

We want to measure the tightness of the reduced Cuff Pressure

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Anesthesiology,Prof. C. Werner, Universitätsmedizin of the JG University

🇩🇪

Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath