跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00758160
NCT00758160已完成4 期

From Immediate-release MPH to OROS MPH: The Impact Upon Family of Children and Adolescents With ADHD

Johnson & Johnson Taiwan Ltd0 个研究点目标入组 296 人开始时间: 2008年3月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
296
主要终点
Mean Change From Baseline in Swanson, Nolan and Pelham-Fourth Edition (SNAP-IV) Rating Scale (Parents) Score at Week 2

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether familial relationships and psychological status of participants or caregivers as well as Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms of participants can be improved by switching from Immediate-release Methylphenidate (IR-MPH) to Osmotic Release Oral Delivery System Methylphenidate (OROS-MPH).

详细描述

This is a prospective (study following participants forward in time), single-arm, open-label (all people know the identity of the intervention), 8-week, multi-centric (conducted in more than 1 center) study. OROS-MPH will be administered orally for 2 months at doses of 18, 36, or 54 milligram (mg) to replace IR-MPH. Clinicians will adjust the dose of each participant according to participant's clinical responses and/or side effects. During the study period, participants will be assessed on Week 2, 4, and 8. Efficacy will be evaluated primarily based on change from baseline in Chinese version of the 26-item Swanson, Nolan and Pelham-Fourth Edition (SNAP-IV) rating scale assessed by parents and Chinese Health Questionnaire (CHQ). Safety will be monitored throughout the study.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
6 Years 至 18 Years(Child, Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Participants who are diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV)
  • Participants who have been treated with Immediate-release methyphenidate (IR-MPH) for at least 4 weeks before enrollment, but previous treatment is considered unsatisfactory due to 1 or more of the following reasons: lack of effectiveness, lack of tolerability or safety, lack of compliance, and/or other reasons
  • Participants who are able to comply with the study visit schedule and whose parents/caregiver and community school teacher are willing and able to complete the protocol-specified assessments
  • Participants who are still at school
  • Participants who are treated with greater than equal to 10 milligram (mg) IR-MPH daily before enrollment

排除标准

  • Participants who cannot understand or follow the instructions given in the study
  • Participants with serious or unstable medical illness
  • Participants who have clinically significant gastrointestinal problems, including narrowing of the gastrointestinal tract
  • Participants who have glaucoma (increased pressure inside the eye that causes visual problems), an ongoing seizure disorders, or a psychotic disorder
  • Participants who are hypersensitive to methylphenidate
  • Participants who have any co-existing medical condition or are taking a concomitant medication that is likely to interfere with safe administration of methylphenidate

研究组 & 干预措施

OROS methylphenidate

Experimental

Participants willl receive Osmotic Release Oral Delivery System (OROS) methylphenidate (MPH) 18 milligram (mg), 36 mg or 54 mg once daily for 8 weeks. Dose will be adjusted for each participant based on clinical responses and/or side effects.

干预措施: OROS Methylphenidate (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Mean Change From Baseline in Swanson, Nolan and Pelham-Fourth Edition (SNAP-IV) Rating Scale (Parents) Score at Week 2

时间窗: Baseline and Week 2

Parents were asked to assess their children on a 26-item Chinese SNAP-IV questionnaire consisting of inattention (items 1-9; subscore range 0-27), hyperactivity (items 10-18; subscore range 0-27) and oppositional (19-26, subscore range 0-24) subscales used to assess the qualitative judgments in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Each item was based on a 4-point likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). The overall score ranged from 0 to 78. The total score for Inattention and hyperactivity ranged from 0 to 27 and for oppositional ranged from 0 to 21. Mean Change was calculated as mean SNAP-IV score at Week 2 minus mean SNAP-IV score at Baseline.

Mean Change From Baseline in Swanson, Nolan and Pelham-Fourth Edition (SNAP-IV) Rating Scale (Parents) Score at Week 4

时间窗: Baseline and Week 4

Parents were asked to assess their children on a 26-item Chinese SNAP-IV questionnaire consisting of inattention (items 1-9; subscore range 0-27), hyperactivity (items 10-18; subscore range 0-27) and oppositional (19-26, subscore range 0-24) subscales used to assess the qualitative judgments in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Each item was based on a 4-point likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). The overall score ranged from 0 to 78. The total score for Inattention and hyperactivity ranged from 0 to 27 and for oppositional ranged from 0 to 21. Mean Change was calculated as mean SNAP-IV score at Week 4 minus mean SNAP-IV score at Baseline.

Mean Change From Baseline in Swanson, Nolan and Pelham-Fourth Edition (SNAP-IV) Rating Scale (Parents) Score at Week 8

时间窗: Baseline and Week 8

Parents were asked to assess their children on a 26-item Chinese SNAP-IV questionnaire consisting of inattention (items 1-9; subscore range 0-27), hyperactivity (items 10-18; subscore range 0-27) and oppositional (19-26, subscore range 0-24) subscales used to assess the qualitative judgments in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Each item was based on a 4-point likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). The overall score ranged from 0 to 78. The total score for Inattention and hyperactivity ranged from 0 to 27 and for oppositional ranged from 0 to 21. Mean Change was calculated as mean SNAP-IV score at Week 8 minus mean SNAP-IV score at Baseline.

Mean Change From Baseline in Chinese Health Questionnaire (CHQ) at Week 4

时间窗: Baseline and Week 4

The CHQ is a self administered screening instrument used to assess psychiatric morbidity in the Chinese community. It was derived from the General Health Questionnaire, and has been validated with satisfactory construct validity and applied in the survey of psychiatric morbidity in the community and in hospital settings. Four factors are included in the structure: somatic symptoms; anxiety and worrying; sleep problems; and depression and poor family relationships. It contains 12 items, with a maximum score of 12. CHQ scores indicated the severity of participants' psychological problems (0-2=normal; 3-4=minor; 5-6=moderate; and 7-12=severe psychological problems). Mean Change was calculated as mean CHQ score at Week 4 minus mean CHQ score at Baseline.

Mean Change From Baseline in Chinese Health Questionnaire (CHQ) at Week 8

时间窗: Baseline and Week 8

The CHQ is a self administered screening instrument used to assess psychiatric morbidity in the Chinese community. It was derived from the General Health Questionnaire, and has been validated with satisfactory construct validity and applied in the survey of psychiatric morbidity in the community and in hospital settings. Four factors are included in the structure: somatic symptoms; anxiety and worrying; sleep problems; and depression and poor family relationships. It contains 12 items, with a maximum score of 12. CHQ scores indicated the severity of participants' psychological problems (0-2=normal; 3-4=minor; 5-6=moderate; and 7-12=severe psychological problems). Mean Change was calculated as mean CHQ score at Week 8 minus mean CHQ score at Baseline.

次要结局

  • Chinese Version of the Family Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolve (Family APGAR-C) Score(Baseline, Week 4 and 8)
  • Swanson, Nolan and Pelham-Fourth Edition (SNAP-IV) Rating Scale (Teachers) Score(Baseline, Week 2, 4 and 8)
  • Social Adjustment Scale Score for Children and Adolescents (SAICA)(Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8)
  • Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score(Baseline, Week 2, 4 and 8)
  • Number of Participants With Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score(Baseline, Week 2, 4 and 8)
  • Global Assessment of Satisfaction by Parents/Caregivers(Baseline, Week 2, 4 and 8)

研究者

申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验

The Impact of Osmotic Release Oral Delivery System... | 临床试验