Unilateral vs Bilateral Application of Muscle Energy Techniques in Pelvic Somatic Dysfunction
- Conditions
- Pelvic Somatic Dysfunction
- Interventions
- Other: Osteopathic Treatment Technique- Muscle Energy Treatment
- Registration Number
- NCT06266650
- Lead Sponsor
- The Touro College and University System
- Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy of pelvic muscle energy technique online against the traditional full length osteopathic pelvic treatment protocol. The main question it aims to answer are
• Can one single pelvic muscle energy technique can correct all pelvic somatic dysfunctions (SD)?
Participants will
* be positioned by the physician into the area of treatment into a position of resistance, which is the restrictive barrier.
* be instructed to use the targeted muscles for 3-5 seconds in the direction of ease while the physician provides a counterforce.
* be instructed to stop contracting their muscles and evaluate the area for decreased tension, then repositions the patient into their new restrictive barrier.
* These steps are repeated three to five times and then the dysfunction is reevaluated.
Subjects diagnosed with pelvic SD will be divided into two groups. One group will be treated with traditional one and be compared with the pelvic muscle energy group.
- Detailed Description
Osteopathic muscle energy technique (MET) is a well-known modality widely used by osteopathic practitioners. MET can be applied to different regions and segments of the body, is well tolerated and effective in reducing muscle hypertonicity and pain sensation. MET involves a patient actively using their muscles on request from a precisely controlled position, in a specific direction, against a distinctly executed counter force. The group of pelvic MET consists of specific variations directed to particular somatic dysfunction (SD) of innominate and pubic bones, such as pelvic shears, pelvic outflares and pelvic inflares. All techniques are well known and widely used. Based on empirical clinical observations, not confirmed by any research, it was suggested that pubic abduction/adduction SD MET combination should be able to correct all pelvic SD including innominate SD.
The investigators intend to assess if application of abduction/adduction SD combination MET may resolve any one-sided diagnosed pelvic SD.
MET involves a patient actively using their muscles on request from a precisely controlled position, in a specific direction, against a distinctly executed counter force. During MET, the physician positions the area of treatment into a position of resistance, which is the restrictive barrier. The physician then instructs the patient to use the targeted muscles for 3-5 seconds in the direction of ease while the physician provides a counterforce. The physician then tells the patient to stop contracting their muscles and evaluate the area for decreased tension, then repositions the patient into their new restrictive barrier. These steps are repeated three to five times and then the dysfunction is reevaluated.
Subjects diagnosed with pelvic SD will be divided into two groups. The control group will be treated with traditional one-sided MET, the second group will be treated with combination MET. Results of post-treatment exams will be collected and statistically analyzed.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Pelvic Muscle Energy - two sided Osteopathic Treatment Technique- Muscle Energy Treatment Receives pubic abduction/adduction somatic dysfunction combinations two sided Pelvic Muscle Energy - One sided Osteopathic Treatment Technique- Muscle Energy Treatment Receives pubic abduction/adduction somatic dysfunction combinations one sided
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Resolution of pelvic somatic dysfunction Through treatment completion, on average 30 minutes Restoration of anatomical landmarks symmetry
Tested using forward flexion test - Standing upright subject bends forward and motion in sacroiliac joint is evaluated. The side where the investigator's thumb moves farthest is the restricted side. This side will be treated with muscle energry.
Resolution will show symmetry between the sacroiliac joints.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Posterior anatomical landmarks assessment 5 minutes Posterior superior iliac spine symmetry or asymmetry
Anterior anatomical landmarks assessment 5 minutes Anterior superior iliac spine symmetry or asymmetry
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine
🇺🇸Harlem, New York, United States