BIA Versus Physician Adjustment in Acute Kidney Injury Patients Requiring Renal Replacement Therapy
- Conditions
- Intradialytic HypotensionCardiac EventRenal InsufficiencyHospital Length of Stay
- Interventions
- Procedure: Physician-guidedDevice: Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
- Registration Number
- NCT03916861
- Brief Summary
This study was designed to compare the efficacy of BIA and physician adjustment to prevent intradialytic hypotension in patients with acute kidney injury who received renal replacement therapy. The investigators randomized 9 patients with acute kidney injury and volume overloaded who underwent acute hemodialysis for 45 sessions in Vajira hospital between October 2017 and February 2018. In physician adjust-group (control) estimate by physical examination and fluid balance record. Primary outcome was intradialytic hypotensive episode and secondary outcome was hemodialysis-related adverse events and other clinical outcome.
- Detailed Description
Background
Volume overload and intradialytic hypotension are significant complications with increasing mortality rate in hemodialysis patients. Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) has been used to estimate the optimum weight in chronic hemodialysis patient to prevent intradialytic hypotension.Volume assessment in acute kidney injury is also of great importance , however, there are currently few methods to obtain an accurate assessment of hydration status in this scenario. This study was designed to compare the efficacy of BIA and physician adjustment to prevent intradialytic hypotension in patients with acute kidney injury who received renal replacement therapy.
Methods
The investigators randomized 9 patients with acute kidney injury and volume overloaded who underwent acute hemodialysis for 45 sessions in Vajira hospital between October 2017 and February 2018. Volume overload was defined by BIA with value more than\>0.4. In physician adjust-group (control) estimate by physical examination and fluid balance record. Primary outcome was intradialytic hypotensive episode and secondary outcome was hemodialysis-related adverse events and other clinical outcome.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 9
- Patients with acute kidney injury with volume overload unresponsive to medication therapy =Required renal replacement therapy (RRT)
Patients who were pregnant
- Advanced malignancy
- Kidney transplantation
- AKI from toxins
- Currently on pacemaker
- Had underlying chronic kidney disease
- Patients with severe cardiovascular disease such as congestive heart failure, valvular regurgition
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Physicain-guided group Physician-guided The fluid monitoring will be managed by physician-adjustment by physical examination and fluid balance record . The fluid balance (FB) is the total fluid administered minus the total fluids eliminated over a period of time. Bioelectrical Impedance Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis The first group will be monitored by Inbody S20 analysis to measure fluid status. The Bioimpedance will be measured each time prior to hemodialysis session . The value of BIA measurement of more than 0.4 will be considered as edema.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in blood pressure during dialysis During hemodialysis session start from enrollment until study completion, up to 4 hours Blood pressure less than 20 mmHg from baseline ( systolic blood pressure)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Hospital length of stay Up to 3 months after enrollment Total days in admission
Percent of renal function at least 3 months after enrollment eGFR
Cardiac problem Measure through study completion,for at least 3 months after randomization Number of patients that have palpitation,cardiac arrthymia or chest pain
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Thananda Trakarnvanich
ðđðBangkok, āļāļĢāļļāļāđāļāļāļĄāļŦāļēāļāļāļĢ, Thailand