Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01520636
NCT01520636TerminatedNot Applicable

What Should be the Best Physiotherapy Early After Stroke ?

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris2 sites in 1 country104 target enrollmentStarted: July 1, 2012Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Terminated
Enrollment
104
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Evolution of the motor control deficiency assessed by the Fugl Meyer (FM) scale modified by LINDMARK

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study is designed to observe the respective effects of 2 types of physiotherapy early after a cerebral stroke. The hypothesis is that an intensive physiotherapy early delivered (Day 2 to D15) after a stroke could induce faster motor control recovery than a conservative physiotherapy aiming at preventing complications.

Detailed Description

Hypothesis:

An intensive and active physiotherapy delivered as soon as D2 post stroke could induce faster motor control recovery and autonomy than could do an usual conservative treatment aiming at preventing complications. The benefits could be a shortened inpatient stay (both in stroke unit and rehabilitation centre), a reduction of the secondary complications with a cut in of the total cost of care.

Primary objective:

To compare two strategies of physiotherapy on the evolution of motor control recovery during the first 3 months post stroke.

Secondary objectives :

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients informed and giving their written consent.First
  • •Ever ischemic hemispheric or haemorrhagic stroke, unilateral, occurred between the 25th and the 72nd previous hours
  • •Age ≥ 18 years old
  • •Motricity quoted by an NIHSS >=2 in the upper limb or in the lower limb

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patient without health insurance.
  • •Coma (NIHSS consciousness > or = 2)
  • •Total recovery within the 24 first hours
  • •Brain stem or cerebellar stroke
  • •Previous neurological history, specially stroke or dementia
  • •Inability to understand the study
  • •Surgical treatment of the stroke
  • •Autonomy before stroke assessed by Rankin score different from 0
  • •Scheduled surgery in the following 15 days

Arms & Interventions

group 1: standard physiotherapy

Placebo Comparator

daily physiotherapy aiming at preventing complications, going with the patient progress capacities, passive mobilisation, sitting as soon as possible, walking when possible, respiratory physiotherapy. 15-20 minutes total per day.

Intervention: standard physiotherapy (Procedure)

group 2: experimental physiotherapy

Experimental

physiotherapy as described above added to verticalisation as soon as possible; active, intense and repeated motor exercises for limbs and trunk with all the available techniques. 60 minutes total per day.

Intervention: experimental physiotherapy (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Evolution of the motor control deficiency assessed by the Fugl Meyer (FM) scale modified by LINDMARK

Time Frame: between day 0 and month 3

Secondary Outcomes

  • Unexpected events(at D30 and M3)
  • Scale PASS(at D30 and M3)
  • Quality of life assessed by the Stroke Impact Scale(at M3)
  • Residency(at M3)
  • Total length of stay as inpatient(up to D30)
  • Autonomy assessed by the Rankin scale(at D15, D30, D45, M3.)
  • Motor control deficiency assessed by the FM scale(at D15, D30, D45, M3)
  • Autonomy assessed by the Functional Independence Measure (motor subscale)(at D30 and M3)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials