MedPath

Evaluation of Home Program and Telerehabilitation for the Treatment Process in Patients With Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Telerehabilitation
Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema
Registration Number
NCT06065423
Lead Sponsor
Marmara University
Brief Summary

During the Covid-19 pandemic, rehabilitation services for all patients were affected, and a term that was previously in use but gained popularity during the pandemic entered our vocabulary: 'Telerehabilitation'. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the treatment process and adherence of patients undergoing telerehabilitation.

Detailed Description

Our study is a randomized single-blind prospective study. Patients aged 18 to 75 years with stage 1-2 lymphedema associated with breast cancer and upper extremity lymphedema, who had undergone breast surgery at least 3 months prior, were included in the study. Group 1: Patients were given a brochure explaining the massage and exercises they should perform. They were periodically contacted by a physiotherapist and clinician to remind them of their tasks. Group 2: Patients underwent telerehabilitation exercises and massages three times a week guided by a physiotherapist and clinician, and on the remaining days, they continued their self-administered tasks. Patients were evaluated three times: before treatment, at weeks 5 and 8 after treatment. During each visit, patients' inter-limb volume difference, Quick DASH and Life Impact Scale scores, pain, tension, stiffness, and heaviness sensations were assessed.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients who had undergone breast surgery at least 3 months ago
  • Had stage 1-2 lymphedema
  • Had upper extremity lymphedema associated with breast cancer
Exclusion Criteria
  • Signs of infection such as lymphangitis, cellulitis, fungal infections
  • Those with documented lymph node metastases
  • Those with bilateral lymphedema
  • Those with other diseases affecting upper extremity functions
  • Those with a history of previous surgery related to the upper extremity

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Symptom SeverityTime Frame: 8 weeks

Shoulder pain, tightness, sensation of heaviness, and stiffness were evaluated using a numerical scale (1 to 10 points)

FunctionalityTime Frame: 8 weeks

Ouick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick DASH) questionnaire

EfficacityTime Frame: 8 weeks

Lymphedema Quality of Life Impact Scale

Volume MeasurementsTime Frame: 8 weeks

Arm measurement was measured with a tape measure at 4 cm intervals and calculated using the cone method in cm3

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Patient satisfaction with the treatmentTime Frame: 8 weeks

Responses were gathered on a scale of very satisfied - satisfied - somewhat satisfied - unsatisfied

patients were asked to compare their hand functionality to before the injuryTime Frame: 8 weeks

Responses were gathered on a scale of 'much better - somewhat better - same - somewhat worse - much worse

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Canan Şanal-Toprak

🇹🇷

İstanbul, Turkey

Marmara University School of Medicine, Pendik Education and Research Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

🇹🇷

Istanbul, Turkey

Canan Şanal-Toprak
🇹🇷İstanbul, Turkey

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.