Efficacy of internal limiting membrane peeling 1 DD versus 2 DD for treatment of large full thickness macular hole: Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial.

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Rate of macular hole closureVisual acuity gain in ETDRS lettersComplications of surgery; Macular hole; Internal limiting membrane peeling; FTMH

• Registration Number: TCTR20180719001
• Lead Sponsor: /A

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2018-07-19
• Study Completion: 2020-01-20
• Last Update Posted: 19 August 2024

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 100

Inclusion Criteria

full thickness macular hole
Age 60 or above
Hole size >500 mcm by spectral domain optical coherence tomography(SD-OCT)
Able to maintain prone position for 7 days at least

Exclusion Criteria

high myopic macular hole
traumatic macular hole
epimacular membrane
vitreomacular traction
previous retinal surgery
ocular media opacity
concurrent ocular disease
advanced glaucoma

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Macular hole closure rate After 3 months, 6 months follow up Measure by spectral domain optical coherence (SD-OCT)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Visual acuity After 3 months, 6 months follow up ETDRS letters by ETDRS chart