Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02458872
NCT02458872
Completed
Not Applicable

Impact of a Data-driven Monitor Alarm Reduction Strategy Implemented in Safety Huddles

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia1 site in 1 country77,280 target enrollmentJuly 2015
ConditionsHospitalization

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Hospitalization
Sponsor
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Enrollment
77280
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Change from baseline in the unit-wide rate of alarms per patient-day at 44 weeks
Status
Completed
Last Updated
8 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This is a pragmatic, paired, cluster-randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of a safety huddle-based intervention on physiologic monitor alarm rates on pediatric inpatient units.

Detailed Description

Hospital physiologic monitors can alert clinicians to early signs of physiologic deterioration, and thus have great potential to be life-saving. However, monitors generate frequent alarms, most of which are non-actionable. When clinicians become overburdened with alarms, they begin to exhibit alarm fatigue: responding more slowly to alarms or ignoring alarms entirely. In this protocol the investigators outline the methods they will use to evaluate the impact of a safety huddle-based intervention on physiologic monitor alarm rates using a pragmatic, paired, cluster-randomized controlled trial with the intervention delivered at the unit level. This work is considered quality improvement research, and some of the approaches described in this protocol are from the field of quality improvement. Currently, at most hospitals data like this on the numbers of alarms that patients generate are only available to researchers with the software tools needed to interrogate and record data from the monitor network. The goal of this proposal is to bring this data to the safety huddles occurring daily on inpatient units in an accessible format to help teams make informed decisions about monitoring and minimize the potential of harm from alarm fatigue.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 2015
End Date
May 2016
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change from baseline in the unit-wide rate of alarms per patient-day at 44 weeks

Time Frame: Baseline and 44 weeks

Secondary Outcomes

  • Pre-post huddle patient-level difference in differences of alarm rates(The 24 hours before a safety huddle opportunity versus the 24 hours before a safety huddle opportunity)
  • Implementation outcomes(Within 4 hours after the huddle intervention occurred)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials