aser for pain relief in Nipple and Perineal Trauma in postpartum
- Conditions
- MastitisEpisiotomyLacerationsPainC12.050.703.844
- Registration Number
- RBR-2qm8jrp
- Lead Sponsor
- Centro de Atenção Integral à Saúde da Mulher
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
Inclusion criteria for the Nipple Trauma group: Older than 18 years; Who are breastfeeding and have nipple trauma; Present understanding of the Portuguese language and cognitive ability to consent; Reporting nipple pain of at least 4 (four) on the visual analogue scale (VAS) at the time of approach.
Inclusion criteria for the Perineal Trauma group: Older than 18 years; Who have perineal injuries resulting from childbirth (episiotomy or 2nd-degree laceration, at least); Reporting perineal pain of at least 4 (four) on the visual analogue scale (VAS) at the time of the approach; Present understanding of the Portuguese language and cognitive ability to consent.
Exclusion criteria for the Nipple Trauma group: Mastitis or neoplasm; Photosensitivity to exposure to sunlight; Breast malformation, breast implant, or breast reduction surgery.
Exclusion criteria for the Perineal Trauma group: Active gynecological infections; Unresolved puerperal hemorrhage.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Intervention
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method In the perineal trauma arm: With the application of photobiomodulation, a significant reduction in mean pain is expected in the experimental group compared to the sham group, using the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (observing a minimum reduction of 5 points in the Pain Index). Pain Rating; 1 point on the Present Pain Intensity Scale; and 1.37 cm on the Visual Analogue Scale) and the Numerical Pain Assessment Scale (observing a minimum reduction of 2 points).<br><br>In the nipple trauma arm: With the application of photobiomodulation, a significant reduction in mean pain is expected in the experimental group compared to the sham group, using the Visual Analogue Scale (observing a minimum reduction of 1.37 cm) and the Numerical Scale of Pain Assessment (observing a minimum reduction of 2 points).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method In both arms, healing and satisfaction will be evaluated through a telephone interview, using a Likert scale, presenting the percentile of improvement in healing and satisfaction.