Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00202644
NCT00202644
Completed
Phase 4

A Phase IIIb, Randomized, Open Label Study to Compare the Safety, Efficacy and Tolerability of Anagrelide Hydrochloride Versus Hydroxyurea in High-Risk Essential Thrombocythaemia Patients.

Shire15 sites in 6 countries150 target enrollmentJanuary 13, 2006

Overview

Phase
Phase 4
Intervention
Anagrelide
Conditions
Thrombocythemia, Hemorrhagic
Sponsor
Shire
Enrollment
150
Locations
15
Primary Endpoint
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Over Time
Status
Completed
Last Updated
4 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Essential thrombocythaemia is a disorder of bone marrow, which causes too many platelets to be produced. Platelets are small cells carried around in the blood, which help form blood clots. When patients have too many platelets, there is a risk of blood clots forming unnecessarily and excessive bleeding. The aim of this study is to gain additional information on the safety profile of Anagrelide (Xagrid(r)) and Hydroxyurea (also known as hydroxycarbamide).

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 13, 2006
End Date
December 15, 2015
Last Updated
4 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Shire
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Confirmed diagnosis of essential thrombocythaemia - high risk profile
  • Previously untreated with a cytoreductive agent
  • Females of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test prior to entering the study and must agree to use effective birth control for the duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosis of any other myeloproliferative disorder
  • Any known cause for a secondary thrombocytosis
  • Anti-coagulant and anti-aggregant therapies
  • Known or suspected heart disease
  • Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction \< 55%

Arms & Interventions

A

Intervention: Anagrelide

B

Intervention: Hydroxyurea

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Over Time

Time Frame: Baseline and Month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36

The LVEF was measured by echocardiography and considered a sufficiently sensitive measure to evaluate any changes in cardiac function.

Platelet Count at Month 6

Time Frame: Month 6

Platelet count was evaluated.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Percentage of Participants With Partial Response(Baseline up to Month 36)
  • Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count Over Time(Baseline and Month 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36)
  • Change From Baseline in Platelet Counts at Month 3 and 36(Baseline and Month 3 and 36)
  • Percentage of Participants With Complete Response(Baseline up to Month 36)
  • Time to Partial Response(Baseline up to Month 36)
  • Number of Participants With Thrombotic and Haemorrhagic Events(From the signing of informed consent until the last study-related visit (Month 36))
  • Time to Complete Response(Baseline up to Month 36)
  • Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell Count Over Time(Baseline and Month 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36)

Study Sites (15)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials