Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01363258
NCT01363258
Completed
Not Applicable

Reducing Care-Resistant Behaviors During Oral Hygiene in Persons With Dementia

University of Alabama at Birmingham4 sites in 1 country100 target enrollmentApril 2011

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Care-resistant Behavior
Sponsor
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Enrollment
100
Locations
4
Primary Endpoint
Care-Resistant Behavior
Status
Completed
Last Updated
7 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The main purpose of this study is to test a method of providing mouth care to persons with dementia who live in nursing homes. The method of providing mouth care is designed to reduce fear in persons with dementia, so that these persons do not resist mouth care.

Detailed Description

Nursing home (NH) residents with dementia are often dependent on others for mouth care, yet will react with care-resistant behavior (CRB) when receiving assistance. The oral health of these elders deteriorates in the absence of daily oral hygiene, predisposing them to harmful systemic problems such as pneumonia, hyperglycemia, cardiac disease, and cerebral vascular accidents. The purpose of this study is to determine whether CRBs can be reduced, and oral health improved, through the application of an intervention based on the neurobiological principles of threat perception and fear response. When faced with a threat, all organisms react with "flight-fight" responses. These responses are both autonomic (e.g. elevated heart rate, sweating) and behavioral (e.g. moving away, attacking). Persons with dementia have heightened threat perception as a result of neurobiological changes that affect the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and amygdala. These individuals may interpret mouth care as a threatening action by threatening people. The intervention, called Managing Oral Hygiene Using Threat Reduction (MOUTh), combines best mouth care practices with a constellation of behavioral techniques that reduce threat perception and thereby prevent or de-escalate CRB. The primary specific aims of the study are to: 1)Evaluate the efficacy of the MOUTh intervention for reducing CRBs in persons with dementia; 2)Validate the overall efficacy of the MOUTh intervention using nurse-sensitive oral health outcomes--swollen and bleeding gums, cleanliness of the oral cavity, saliva, and integrity of the lips and oral mucosa; and 3)Calculate the cost of the MOUTh intervention. Using a randomized repeated measures design, 80 elders with dementia from 5 different NHs will be randomized at the individual level to the experimental group, which will receive the intervention, or to the control group, which will receive standard mouth care from research team members who receive training in the proper methods for providing mouth care but no training in resistance recognition or prevention/mediation. Oral health assessments and CRB measurements will be obtained during a 7-day observation period and a 21-day intervention period. Individual growth models using multilevel analysis will be used to estimate the efficacy of the intervention for reducing CRBs in persons with dementia, and to estimate the overall efficacy of the intervention using oral health outcomes. Activity-based costing methods will be used to determine the cost of the MOUTh intervention. At the end of this study, the research team anticipates having a proven intervention that prevents and reduces CRB within the context of mouth care. Long-term objectives include testing the effect of the intervention on systemic illnesses among persons with dementia; examining the transferability of this intervention to other activities of daily living; and disseminating threat reduction interventions to NH staff, which may radically change the way care is provided to persons with dementia.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 2011
End Date
November 2015
Last Updated
7 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Rita A. Jablonski

Associate Professor

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • English-speaking
  • age 55 or older
  • documented diagnosis of dementia, Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, or Lewy body dementia
  • identified by NH staff as resistant to mouth care
  • at least 2 adjacent teeth AND/OR daily wearing of at least one denture plate
  • the ability to hold a toothbrush
  • the ability to move his or her hand to his or her mouth.

Exclusion Criteria

  • age less than 55
  • no documented diagnosis of dementia
  • inability to hold a toothbrush
  • inability to raise his or her hand to his or her mouth
  • receiving treatment for an active dental or denture problem
  • a diagnosis of dysphagia requiring thickened liquids

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Care-Resistant Behavior

Time Frame: Baseline (observation) to follow-up (week 3)

Care-resistant behavior will be measured using the Resistiveness to Care Scale.This instrument is a checklist. The 13 care-resistant behaviors (e.g., turn away, hit/kick, say "no", etc.) are listed on the left side of the instrument. There are 3 columns for each behavior (mild, moderate, and severe). When behaviors occur, a tick mark is placed in the appropriate column (mild, moderate, or severe). The final score is obtained by multiplying the sums for mild by 1, the sums for moderate by 2, and the sums for severe behavior by 3. These subtotals are then summed together for a final care-resistant behavior score. One cannot determine the frequency and quality of behaviors from raw scores alone. For example, a score of 12 could mean 12 "mild" behaviors or 4 "severe" behaviors. The sums were used as global care-resistant behavior. Higher numbers signify more frequent and intense care-resistant behavior. Minimum value was 0, max value was 25.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Oral Health(Baseline (observation) to follow-up (week 3))

Study Sites (4)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials