A Study to Determine the Effect of Methotrexate (MTX) Dose on Clinical Outcome and Ultrasonographic Signs in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Treated With Adalimumab (MUSICA)
- Registration Number
- NCT01185288
- Lead Sponsor
- AbbVie (prior sponsor, Abbott)
- Brief Summary
This study will investigate the efficacy of both low and high doses of methotrexate (MTX) in combination with open-label adalimumab (ADA) in patients who have had an inadequate response to high dose of MTX. The study will also evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of the two regimens of MTX in combination with ADA in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 309
- Adult subjects with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis
- Subjects must have a DAS28(CRP) (Disease Activity Score using C-Reactive Protein) greater than or equal to 3.2 at baseline (there is no minimum CRP score required to qualify)
- Subjects must have at least 5/68 tender joints plus 5/66 swollen joints assessed at screening or baseline
- Subject must treated with and MTX (methotrexate) dose (oral and/or injectable) of 15 mg or more per week (no upper limit on dose) for at least 12 weeks prior to screening
- Subject is either biologic-naïve or has only one prior biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (i.e. abatacept, anakinra, certolizumab, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, or tocilizumab)
- Previous exposure to adalimumab (Humira), rituximab (Rituxan), natalizumab (Tysabri), efalizumab (Raptiva)
- Subject has been treated with intra-articular or parenteral administration of corticosteroids within 4 weeks of screening
- Subject has diagnosis or history of gout or pseudogout
- Subject has undergone joint surgery within 12 weeks of screening (at joints to be assessed by ultrasound)
- Subject has history of chronic arthritis diagnosed before age 16 years
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Adalimumab + Low Dose Methotrexate Adalimumab Open-label adalimumab (40 mg subcutaneous every other week) plus blinded, low dose methotrexate (7.5 mg orally once weekly). Adalimumab + Low Dose Methotrexate Methotrexate Open-label adalimumab (40 mg subcutaneous every other week) plus blinded, low dose methotrexate (7.5 mg orally once weekly). Adalimumab + High Dose Methotrexate Adalimumab Open-label adalimumab (40 mg subcutaneous every other week) plus blinded, high dose methotrexate (20 mg orally once weekly). Adalimumab + High Dose Methotrexate Methotrexate Open-label adalimumab (40 mg subcutaneous every other week) plus blinded, high dose methotrexate (20 mg orally once weekly).
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints Based on C-reactive Protein (DAS28[CRP]) at Week 24 Week 24 The DAS28(CRP) score includes 28 tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, C-reactive protein, and participant's global assessment of disease activity. Scores on the DAS28(CRP) range from 0 to 10. A DAS28(CRP) score ≥ 5.1 indicates high disease activity, and a DAS28(CRP) score \< 2.6 indicates clinical remission. Least squares means and 95% CI were from 2-way ANCOVA model with effects for baseline DAS28(CRP) value, treatment group, and prior methotrexate dose group.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Criteria Response at Week 24 Baseline, 24 weeks Response, as defined by ACR50 criteria at week 24. A participant is a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline are met: ≥ 50% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: physician global assessment of disease activity, participant global assessment of disease activity, participant assessment of pain, disability index of the health assessment questionnaire, and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein).
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Criteria Response at Week 24 Baseline, 24 weeks Response, as defined by ACR70 criteria at week 24. A participant is a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline are met: ≥ 70% improvement in tender joint count; ≥ 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and ≥ 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters: physician global assessment of disease activity, participant global assessment of disease activity, participant assessment of pain, disability index of the health assessment questionnaire, and acute phase reactant value (C-reactive protein).
Percentage of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) ≤ -0.22 at Week 24 Baseline, 24 weeks The HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and daily activities. Participants assessed their ability to do each task over the past week using the following response categories: without any difficulty (0), with some difficulty (1), with much difficulty (2), and unable to do (3). Scores on each task were summed and averaged to provide an overall score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 3 (very severe, high dependency disability). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) defined for the HAQ-DI is a change from baseline of ≤ -0.22. Normal physical function is defined by HAQ-DI score of \< 0.5. Negative change from baseline in the overall score indicates improvement.
Percent Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Version II (MOS) Sleep Problem Index 9 at Week 24 Baseline, 24 weeks The least squares mean percentage change in MOS Sleep Problem Index 9 from baseline to week 24. The MOS Sleep Problem Index 9 consists of 9 questions to assess sleep, including how long it takes the participant to fall asleep (1=0 to 15 minutes, to 5=more than 60 minutes); and aspects of related to quality of sleep, including how often the participant felt that the sleep was not quiet, felt rested upon waking, awakened short of breath or with a headache, felt drowsy during the day, had trouble falling sleep, how often were awaken, had trouble staying awake during the day, and got needed amount of sleep (1=all the time; 5=none of the time). Least squares means and 95% CI were from 2-way ANCOVA model with effects for baseline MOS Sleep Problem Index value, treatment group, and prior methotrexate dose group.
Percentage of Participants With Power Doppler Ultrasound (PD U/S) Score for Synovial Vascularity Improvement by 30% at Week 24 Baseline, 24 weeks PD U/S assessed the severity of synovial inflammation in both hands (bilateral wrists, metacarpophalangeal joints 2, 3, 5, and metatarsophalangeal joint 5). Bilateral images based on dorsal midline imaging of the wrist, dorsal and volar imaging of metacarpophalangeal joints, and dorsal imaging alone of metatarsophalangeal joints are scored using a 4-grade scale: grade 0 or normal = normal joint (no Doppler signal); grade 1 or mild = mild synovitis (≤ 3 isolated signals); grade 2 or moderate = moderate synovitis (\> 3 isolated signals or a confluent signal in \< 50% of synovial area); grade 3 or marked = marked synovitis (signals in ≥ 50% of the synovial area). Each image is rated 0 to 3, for a total possible score ranging from 0 to 48 (16\*0, 16\*3) for 2 hands. Higher grade/score=more severe disease. Change = week 24 score - baseline score.
Trial Locations
- Locations (49)
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 43049
🇺🇸Danbury, Connecticut, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 60850
🇵🇷San Juan, Puerto Rico
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 60851
🇵🇷Vega Baja, Puerto Rico
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38978
🇺🇸Freehold, New Jersey, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44823
🇺🇸Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38086
🇺🇸Covington, Louisiana, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 40123
🇺🇸Voorhees, New Jersey, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38265
🇺🇸Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 39024
🇺🇸Mayfield Village, Ohio, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 39023
🇺🇸Eugene, Oregon, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38083
🇺🇸Sarasota, Florida, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38204
🇺🇸Victorville, California, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38203
🇺🇸Tacoma, Washington, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38424
🇺🇸Spokane, Washington, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 37980
🇺🇸Dallas, Texas, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38687
🇺🇸Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38983
🇺🇸Bronx, New York, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 40762
🇺🇸Walnut Creek, California, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44888
🇺🇸Dallas, Texas, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38981
🇺🇸Bowling Green, Kentucky, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38087
🇺🇸Franklin, Wisconsin, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 40125
🇺🇸Fall River, Massachusetts, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38691
🇵🇷San Juan, Puerto Rico
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38982
🇺🇸Huntsville, Alabama, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38686
🇺🇸Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 40208
🇺🇸Long Beach, California, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 37981
🇺🇸Hemet, California, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 40105
🇺🇸Miami, Florida, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 40210
🇺🇸Seattle, Washington, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38542
🇺🇸Seattle, Washington, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 37983
🇺🇸Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 43050
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 43735
🇺🇸San Antonio, Texas, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 65490
🇺🇸Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 40127
🇺🇸Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38084
🇺🇸Seattle, Washington, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 42044
🇺🇸Mesa, Arizona, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38688
🇺🇸Lawrenceville, Georgia, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 40128
🇺🇸Springfield, Illinois, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38689
🇺🇸Meridian, Idaho, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38085
🇺🇸Rock Island, Illinois, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 40124
🇺🇸Clifton, New Jersey, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38264
🇺🇸Smithtown, New York, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38263
🇺🇸Asheville, North Carolina, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38261
🇺🇸Greenville, North Carolina, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38082
🇺🇸Jackson, Tennessee, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38202
🇺🇸Bend, Oregon, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 44344
🇺🇸Richmond, Virginia, United States
Site Reference ID/Investigator# 38423
🇺🇸Sacramento, California, United States