跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02447575
NCT02447575已完成不适用

Detecting Errors In Using Metered Dose Inhalers (MDI) Among Asthma And Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Patients

Baylor College of Medicine1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 23 人开始时间: 2015年2月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
23
试验地点
1
主要终点
Inhaler Use Correctness

研究概览

简要总结

Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) and Dry Powdered Inhaler (DPI) are the two most common devices used to deliver medicine in conditions such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It is well-known that most patients do not use correct technique when using a metered dose inhaler. This leads to poor control of their disease. This study is being done so the investigators can record the patient using the metered dose inhaler before and after a short teaching session. This information will be fed into an invitro system (device) to allow the researchers to study the effect of error on drug delivery. The device being used is the Rice R3 electronic flowmeter.

详细描述

Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) and Dry Powdered Inhaler (DPI) are the two most common platforms to deliver medicine for patients suffering from Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and are used for dispensing both controller and rescue medications. Despite well-known methods to manage Asthma and COPD, nearly 70-90% of the patients do not display correct technique in using an inhaler. Poor management and control of the disease due to inadequate inhaler usage has resulted in rising rates of hospitalizations, making chronic respiratory diseases among the top five causes of death worldwide. Through this study we aim to record the technique of MDI usage among Asthma and COPD patient and understand the errors in their technique. The various parameters of inhaler usage where patients can make an error are 1. Tidal volume, 2. inspiration flow rate, 3. Inspiration flow volume, 4. Timing of actuation of inhaler and 5. Breath-holding. The parameters will be recorded by the Cognita R3 electronic flowmeter for each patient and the errors in each MDI usage will be noted. Using ex-vivo modelling, the patient's MDI technique recorded will be used to study the impact of errors in technique on efficiency of MDI drug delivery.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Patients with a physician diagnosis of asthma or COPD taking inhaled medications using MDI
  • •Age >18 years
  • •Able to read and sign consent document

排除标准

  • •Patients having acute exacerbation
  • •Patients who are unable to take medication from an MDI

研究组 & 干预措施

MDI use Evaluation

Other

All subjects took 2 or more puffs of the placebo metered dose inhaler (MDI), attaching the Cognita electronic flowmeter to show measurements during the MDI use.

The inhaler technique is also evaluated by study staff prior to an education demonstration.

干预措施: Education on Use of MDI (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Inhaler Use Correctness

时间窗: Single event- Outcome measured per inhaler puff, during the single clinic visit.

This is an observational study, the aim is to record a variety of MDI usage techniques performed by patients. The technique is scored out of 7 for the following 7 steps: 1. Shaking (0 = not shaken, 1 = shaken) 2. Coordination (0 = MDI actuated before inhalation start, 1 = MDI actuated after inhalation start) 3. Flow rate (0 = mean inspiratory flow rate \<30L/min or greater than 60L/min, 1 = mean inspiratory flow rate between 30-60L/min) 4. Duration of inhalation (0 = duration of inhalation \<3 sec, 1 = duration of inhalation \>=3sec) 5. Orientation of inhaler (0 = inhaler not upright = \> 30° from the vertical position, 1 = inhaler upright = within 30° from the vertical position) 6. Number of exhalation (0 = exhalation during inhaler use, 1 = no exhalations) 7. Single Actuation (0 = less than 0 or more than 1 inhaler actuation, 1 = exactly 1 inhaler actuation) The total score is a minimum of 0 correct steps if all the steps are incorrect to a maximum of 7 correct steps.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Nicola Hanania

Associate Professor of Medicine

Baylor College of Medicine

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验