Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01116518
NCT01116518CompletedNot Applicable

Treatment of Atraumatic Rotator Cuff Rupture in Elderly Patients

Turku University Hospital3 sites in 1 country180 target enrollmentStarted: February 1, 2009Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
180
Locations
3
Primary Endpoint
Constant score

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of the investigators study is to compare the effect of: 1) physiotherapy 2) arthroscopic acromioplasty and debridement or 3) arthroscopic rotator cuff reconstruction and acromioplasty in the treatment of degenerative, atraumatic rotator cuff rupture.

Detailed Description

The study will be conducted according to the revised Declaration of Helsinki by The World Medical Association and the ICH-guidelines for good clinical trial practice. The study will be submitted for approval to the Ethics Committee of the Hospital District of Varsinais-Suomi, Finland. A written informed consent will be obtained from each patient.

This study will be conducted at three different hospitals i.e. Turku University Hospital, Tampere University Hospital (Hatanpää hospital) and Kuopio University Hospital as a multicenter study. A total of 180 patients, 60 patients at each hospital, will be included in this study. The patients are clinically examined and a routine x-ray and MRI-investigation are performed. Patients must have an atraumatic degenerative supraspinatus tendon rupture comprising less than 2/3 of the tendon insertion, i.e. 1/3 of the tendon insertion must be intact. The rupture must be documented by MRI investigation. Patients must be willing and give a written informed consent. After recruitment the patients are randomized in one of three studied treatment modalities. The randomization is made after clinical and MRI investigation by neutral attendant using sealed envelopes. 60 identical envelopes (20 per group) are made in each center.

The Constant score is used as a primary outcome measure. The Constant score is measured from each patient right before treatment intervention and at three and six months, one, two and five years after the intervention. The intervention groups are designed in a cumulative fashion: structured and standardized physiotherapy treatment proceeds gradually in all patients (groups 1,2,3), in addition to physiotherapy patients in group 2 are treated with acromioplasty, and patients in group 3 with acromioplasty and rotator cuff reconstruction.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
55 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •age over 55 years
  • •atraumatic penetrating supraspinatus tendon rupture comprising less than 2/3 of the tendon insertion and documented with MRI investigation.
  • •full active range of motion
  • •written informed consent from participating subject

Exclusion Criteria

  • •age under 55 years
  • •existing significant malignant, haematological, endocrine, metabolic, rheumatoid or gastrointestinal disease
  • •cytostatic or corticosteroid medication
  • •glenohumeral osteoarthrosis grade III or above (X-ray evaluation with present osteophytes according to Kellgren-Lawrence classification)
  • •history of alcoholism, drug abuse, psychological or other emotional problems that are likely to invalidate informed consent
  • •previous same shoulder surgery
  • •a massive tendon tear involving the whole supraspinatus tendon and/or combined tear of two - three tendons ie. supraspinatus with infraspinatus or subscapularis tendon tear.
  • •patients denial

Arms & Interventions

acromioplasty and rotator cuff reconstruction

Active Comparator

Intervention: acromioplasty and rotator cuff reconstruction (Procedure)

physiotherapy

Active Comparator

Intervention: physiotherapy (Procedure)

acromioplasty

Active Comparator

Intervention: acromioplasty (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Constant score

subjective and objective shoulder score

Shoulder score by Constant and Murley

Time Frame: 2 years

Constant scoring is endorsed by SECEC/ESSSE and is the most largely used instrument measuring shoulder pain, function and strenght. This scoring system is very suited for evaluating disability caused by rotator cuff ruptures.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other Gov
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ville Aarimaa

Ville Äärimaa

Turku University Hospital

Study Sites (3)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials