Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02585817
NCT02585817
Completed
Not Applicable

Remote Patient Management for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices - A Pilot Study

Ratika Parkash1 site in 1 country176 target enrollmentOctober 2016

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Arrhythmia, Cardiac
Sponsor
Ratika Parkash
Enrollment
176
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Generalizability: Measurement of generalizability will be done by measuring the number of patients eligible for remote patient management as a proportion of all CIED patients.
Status
Completed
Last Updated
7 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This is a pilot study to assess barriers, evaluate and implement a patient oriented CIED management model incorporating advanced technological innovation to promote a paradigm shift to patient-centered care involving remote CIED monitoring and programming. The advancement in technology is very important as it addresses several potential gaps and barriers in the care of patients with CIEDS:

  1. Long, expensive travel for patients
  2. Morbidity to patients due to delay in receiving appropriate treatment
  3. Efficiency in health care delivery
  4. Patient satisfaction

Detailed Description

Canada is a country with a diverse geography, of which 19% of the inhabitants are in communities classified as 'rural', but many may still have long distances to travel to reach a health care facility. This results in challenges in uniform delivery of health care throughout the country. There are 25,000 pacemaker (PM) implants and 7000 implantable defibrillator (ICD) implants yearly in Canada, with approximately 120 000 patients living with these devices. The recommended follow-up for these devices are based on consensus and position statements, with the majority of patients requiring at least yearly visits to a specialized device clinic during the lifetime of their device. During the life of these patients, many issues may arise, such as atrial or ventricular arrhythmias that may result in syncope, stroke or sudden death, need for increased monitoring resulting from device advisories, or minor programming adjustments to improve device performance, or simply the need for enhanced surveillance as the device battery depletes and replacement is anticipated. While remote monitoring technology is currently available and has permitted surveillance and device assessment from any patient location accessible to a landline or mobile phone, the use has been inconsistent in Canada. In addition, new technology has become available that not only permits surveillance, but also remote programming of these devices. The incorporation of remote programming capability, along with automatic recalibration of device settings, allows us to develop a new paradigm of remote patient management where after the patient receives their device, they would remain in the care of their local health team and no longer require travel to the specialized 'hub' clinics for follow-up.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
October 2016
End Date
April 2019
Last Updated
7 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Ratika Parkash
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ratika Parkash

Staff Cardiologist

Nova Scotia Health Authority

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with an implanted pacemaker/cardiac resynchronization therapy with a pacemaker(CRT-P) capable of remote patient management would be eligible for the study that will be followed by the site where the implantation occurred OR patients with an implanted defibrillator/CRT-D capable of remote patient management where the patients reside in a community OUTSIDE of the site where the implantation occurred. The device may be de novo, existing or a patient undergoing a pulse generator change that now has remote patient management capabilities.
  • Able to provide consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Generalizability: Measurement of generalizability will be done by measuring the number of patients eligible for remote patient management as a proportion of all CIED patients.

Time Frame: 6 months

Secondary Outcomes

  • Feasibility: Feasibility will be measured by the time to implement a fully functioning system at the participating centers(6 months)
  • Compliance (number of received remote transmissions divided by the number of expected remote transmissions)(12 months)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials