Clinical and radiological outcomes of stand-alone cage versus anterior plating in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical disc prolapse – A Comparative Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- Phase 3 4
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 84
- 试验地点
- 1
研究概览
简要总结
Cervical disc prolapse is common in adults under 50 years and may cause radiculopathy or myelopathy. When conservative management fails, Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) is the preferred surgical procedure.
Fusion can be achieved by either anterior cervical plating or a stand alone cage. Plating provides rigid fixation and reduces micromotion but carries risks of plate/screw failure and esophageal irritation. Stand alone cages minimize soft tissue retraction and are claimed to provide similar biomechanical stability.
However, there is no consensus on which method offers superior clinical and radiological outcomes. This study aims to compare the two techniques.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc
- 盲法
- Participant and Investigator Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 80.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Age more than 18 yrs MRI proven cervical disc prolapse with radiculopathy/ myelopathy Failed conservative management for 3 months.
排除标准
- •Age less than 18yrs history of trauma history of infection Previous surgery in the cervical spine Inflammatory arthritis.
研究者
Ramizbhai Memon
srm medical college hospital and research centre
