Comparison of Treatments for Atrophic Acne Scars
- Conditions
- AcneScar
- Interventions
- Procedure: MicroneedlingProcedure: Laser
- Registration Number
- NCT02025088
- Lead Sponsor
- Thaís Hofmann Cachafeiro
- Brief Summary
Acne scars have high prevalence, significant impact on quality of life and are a therapeutic challenge for dermatologists. Previous studies have shown promising results for the treatment of acne scars with non-ablative fractional laser and microneedling, however there are no studies comparing the these techniques. Therefore, the objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of treatment of atrophic acne scars on the face with non-ablative fractional erbium laser and microneedling.
- Detailed Description
Acne is a multifactorial inflammatory dermatosis of the pilosebaceous unit, affecting up to 80 percent of teenagers and approximately 20 percent of adults. Scaring can occur early in acne development and may affect up to 95% of patients with this disease. However, the prevalence of acne scarring varies depending on the study.
Acne scars causes impairment of quality of life and has been described as a risk factor for suicide. Furthermore, it has also been linked to poor self esteem, depression, anxiety and lowered academic performance.
The most common type of acne scarring is atrophic, which includes: ice pick, rolling scars and boxcar scars.
Many treatments have been used for atrophic scars, including resurfacing procedures (chemical peels, dermabrasion and laser treatments), excisional procedures (punch excision, elevation by punch and elliptical excision of scars), application of fillers and microneedling, the latter since 2005, with satisfactory results and minimum time recovery.
Previous studies have shown promising results for the treatment of acne scars with non-ablative fractional laser and microneedling. Previous reports have also shown that the latter is associated with rapid healing period, a low complication rate and a low risk of post inflammatory hyperpigmentation.
However, there are no studies comparing the efficacy of microneedling with other techniques of resurfacing.
This study will be a single-blinded randomized clinical trial, comparing the application of non-ablative fractional erbium laser ProDeep 1340 nm and the technique of induction of neocollagenesis by microneedling. The primary objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of treatment of atrophic acne scars on the face with non-ablative fractional erbium laser and microneedling. The secondary objectives are: assess the degree of satisfaction of participants with both techniques; check tolerability and incidence of adverse effects with both techniques; assess time needed for recovery and number of days absent from work or social activities after the procedures and evaluate the opinion and physical discomfort of each technique.
For each participant, a questionnaire will be filled out with the following information: gender, age, skin type, profession, current or previous history of smoking, use of medications, and presence of active acne. To assess the degree of scarring of the participants, the scale "Quantitative Global Scarring Grading System for Postacne Scarring" will be applied. After this evaluation, patients will be randomly allocated in each study groups (simple randomization). The randomization system was performed with the Microsoft Excel randomization program. Patients in both groups will undergo three sessions of laser treatment or three treatment sessions with microneedling, with an interval of six weeks between them.
Two independent dermatologists, blinded to the group of treatment which each patient belongs to, will apply the Quantitative Global Grading System for Postacne Scarring before treatment, two months and six months after treatment. There are no clinical signs or characteristics that enable the evaluators to identify which group each patient is allocated and patients will be instructed to not provide this information. Six months after completion of treatment, patients will answer a questionnaire to assess their perceptions of the degree of improvement of their scars, pain during treatment and recovery time, assigning values from 0 to 10, where 0 means maximum dissatisfaction and 10, maximum satisfaction.
To detect a difference of one standard deviation in the range between the groups (laser and microneedling), with a power of 90% and an α error ≤ 0.05, 23 patients are required for each group. Data will be inserted in Excel and then exported to SPSS v18.0 for statistical analysis. Quantitative variables will be analyzed by mean and standard deviation and the groups will be compared by Student's t test for independent samples. To compare the variation of the measurements between the groups throughout the sessions the analysis of variance for repeated measures will be used. For the analysis of interobserver agreement the intraclass correlation coefficient and the Bland - Altman method will be used.
This project was approved by the Committee of Research Ethics of our Hospital and all participants will sign an informed consent.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 23
- Clinical diagnosis of moderate or severe atrophic acne scars on the face
- Previous history of photosensitivity or photosensitive diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus or xeroderma pigmentosum
- Previous history or presence of post inflammatory hyperpigmentation
- Use of drugs that may induce hyperpigmentation, such as: amiodarone, clofazimine, minocycline or chloroquine
- Presence of only "ice pick" scars
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Use of oral isotretinoin in the last six months
- History of facial treatments with laser or surgery in the last three months
- Herpetic infection, warts or any other active infection of the adjacent skin
- Presence of skin cancer or actinic keratoses
- Coagulopathies or anticoagulating therapy
- Previous history or presence of hypertrophic scars or keloids
- Patients being treated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy or corticosteroids at high doses
- Diabetes mellitus
- Inability to understand the goals and risks of treatment
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Microneedling Microneedling In the microneedling sessions, the instrument contains 192 microneedles with 2 mm depth, which will be applied to the face in four different directions, making up about 20 movements of "coming and going" in each direction. Laser Laser In each laser session, the non-ablative fractional erbium laser 1340 nm ProDeep (Etheria ® platform/Industra) with tip 100mtz/cm ² will be applied across the face, with a power of 120mJ/mtz time and pulse time of 5ms.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Quantitative Global Grading System for Postacne Scarring Before treatment, two months and six months after treatment Goodman et al. in 2006, developed a scale of global severity of acne scarring, known as the Quantitative Global Scarring Grading System for Postacne Scarring. It relies on a scar count by type, calculating a score according to the number and severity of each type. The grading limits of this instrument are between 0-84 points and it seems to be an accurate and reproducible tool.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Questionnaire to assess patients perceptions of the degree of improvement of scars with the treatment Six months after treatment Questionnaire to assess patients pain during treatment and recovery time Six months after treatment
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
🇧🇷Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil