MedPath

Effect of a Multicomponent Intervention on Functional Capacity After Hip Fracture

Not Applicable
Conditions
Fall
Frailty Syndrome
Osteoporosis
Hip Fractures
Rehabilitation
Interventions
Other: ActiveFLS intervention
Other: Usual care group
Registration Number
NCT05435534
Lead Sponsor
Fundacion Miguel Servet
Brief Summary

Due to the clinical, functional, cognitive and social complexity of older adults after fragility hip fractures (defined as those produced by low-impact trauma), the investigators propose an intervention.

This intervention involves a multidisciplinary and multicomponent program consisting of physical exercise with tele-rehabilitation, nutritional assessment and other variables related to comprehensive geriatric assessment.

The investigators want to improve functional status, quality of life and prevent new fractures. In addition, the investigators try to optimize treatments and resources based on the functional status of patients and their life expectancies, improving care and healthcare cost

Detailed Description

Study aims

1. Improve functional capacity (Short Physical Performance Battery, SPPB) in older patients with fragility hip fractures through a multidisciplinary and multicomponent program and increase the quality of life (EuroQol-5 Dimension) and reduce the use of resources (admission and readmission to emergency department or in-hospital) at 3, 6 and 12 months compare with usual care

2. Analyze the subgroups of patients that benefit the most from the respective interventions, identifying factors of the patient (sociodemographic, clinical, functional and cognitive) and of the intervention (type of exercise, nutritional supplementation, pain control, etc.), which could explain differences in the effectiveness of the intervention at 3, 6 and 12 months

3. Analyze the effect of multidisciplinary and multicomponent intervention in older adults with hip fracture on cognitive capacity (4-AT, MMSE), risk of falls (number of falls, Falls Efficacy Scale), depression (GDS), pain (VAS), polypharmacy, geriatric syndromes and nutritional status (MNA) compare with usual care at 3, 6 and 12 months

4. Developmentally monitor the changes achieved through the intervention, as well as the factors that determine the perpetuation of the benefits of the long-term.

5. Examine the effect of a multi-component program on muscle mass (DXA), bone formation and resorption (BTMs) at 12 months

6. Estimate the prevalence of frailty, multimorbidity and geriatric syndromes in older adults with fragility hip fracture and the changing at 3, 6 and 12 months.

7. Estimate the use of resources necessary to carry out the intervention program, as well as the average time to carry out the comprehensive geriatric assessment, and which is the most cost/efficient tool in this case.

8. Examine the applicability of a tele-rehabilitation program (ActiveHip) in older adults with hip fracture.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
174
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patient aged ≥ 75 years.
  • Diagnosis of frailty hip fracture (those produced by low-impact trauma).
  • Absence of terminal-stage disease
  • Barthel scale score ≥ 60 points.
  • Previous independence for wandering measured as FAC ≥6
  • Capability/Support for using ActiveHip+ app
Exclusion Criteria
  • Moderate-severe cognitive impairment considered as a Goldberg Global Deterioration Scale score ≥ 5.
  • Refusal to sign the informed consent by the patient / main caregiver / legal guardian or inability to obtain it
  • Secondary osteoporosis
  • Nursing home

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Multicomponent interventionActiveFLS interventionParticipants randomly assigned to the Multicomponent intervention group will received a multifactorial intervention.
Usual care groupUsual care groupParticipants randomly assigned to the usual care group will received normal outpatient care, including physical rehabilitation when needed.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)T1 Baseline T2 1month T3 3 months T4 6 months T5 12 months

The primary endpoint will be the changes measured at baseline and follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Barthel indexT1 Baseline T2 1month T3 3 months T4 6 months T5 12 months

Barthel Index of independence during activities of daily living (ADLs). This index ranges from 0 worst to 100 best The endpoint will be the changes measured at baseline and follow-up

Hand grip stengthT1 Baseline T2 1month T3 3 months T4 6 months T5 12 months

Hand grip strength was measured following the Gronigen Elderly Test using a Smedley Hand Dynamometer. The best of three attempts (with 30 seconds rest between each attempt) was recorded.

The endpoint will be the changes measured at baseline and follow-up

FAC scaleT1 Baseline T2 1month T3 3 months T4 6 months T5 12 months

The Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC) is a functional walking test that evaluates ambulation ability. This index ranges from 0 worst to 5 best

The endpoint will be the changes measured at baseline and follow-up

GDS scaleT1 Baseline T2 1month T3 3 months T4 6 months T5 12 months

Global Deterioration Scale of Reisberg (GDS Reisberg). GDS Reisberg describes 7 clinically distinguishable global stages, from normality (GDS 1) to severe dementia (GDS 7) of the Alzheimer disease.

The endpoint will be the changes measured at baseline and follow-up

Number of Participants with InstitutionalizationT2 1month T3 3 months T4 6 months T5 12 months

The endpoint will be the new Number of Participants with institutionalization

The endpoint will be the changes measured at follow-up

Rate of FrailtyT1 Baseline T2 1month T3 3 months T4 6 months T5 12 months

Fried frailty index . This scores range from 0-5 (i.e., 1 point for each component; 0=best to 5=worst) and represent frail (3-5), pre-frail (1-2), and robust (0)

The endpoint will be the changes measured at baseline and follow-up

Lawton indexT1 Baseline T2 1month T3 3 months T4 6 months T5 12 months

Lawton index of independence durante instrumental activities of daily living. This index ranges from 0 worst to 8 best

The endpoint will be the changes measured at baseline and follow-up

Mini- Mental State Examination (MMSE)T1 Baseline T2 1month T3 3 months T4 6 months T5 12 months

MMSE is a 30-point questionnaire that is used extensively in clinical and research settings to measure cognitive impairment. This index ranges from 0 worst to 30 best The endpoint will be the changes measured at baseline and follow-up

Changes in the quality of life measured by the Spanish version of the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaireT1 Baseline T2 1month T3 3 months T4 6 months T5 12 months

The endpoint will be the changes measured at baseline and follow-up

The EQ records the respondent's overall current health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine' Minimum 0 Maximum 100 Higher scores mean a better outcome

Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA)T1 Baseline T2 1month T3 3 months T4 6 months T5 12 months

Scale to diagnosis of malnutrition. This index ranges from 0 worst to 30 best

The endpoint will be the changes measured at baseline and follow-up

MortalityT2 1month T3 3 months T4 6 months T5 12 months

The endpoint will be incidence of this event

Admission and readmission to hospitalT2 1month T3 3 months T4 6 months T5 12 months

The endpoint will be incidence of this event

New fracturesT2 1month T3 3 months T4 6 months T5 12 months

The endpoint will be incidence of this event

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hospital Universitario de Navarra (HUN)

🇪🇸

Pamplona, Navarra, Spain

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath