MedPath

Total Hip Arthroplasty Instability and Lumbo-pelvic Kinematics: EOS Imaging Assessment of Variation in Spinal and Pelvic Parameters From Standing to Sitting

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Hip Fractures
Interventions
Other: EOS imagery
Registration Number
NCT03603470
Lead Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Brief Summary

The authors hypothesize that a pelvic kinematic disorder, demonstrated by a significant decrease in sacral slope, is associated with the risk of instability of total hip prosthesis, the sacral slope being measured by an EOS imaging system during the transition to sitting in unstable patients versus patients with no history of instability.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
80
Inclusion Criteria
  • The patient must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form
  • The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
  • The patient must be at least 18 years old and less than 85 years old
  • Patient has a conventional first intention total hip arthroplasty (not dual mobility) by posterior approach
  • "Case" patients have at least one previous episode of prosthetic dislocation repaired with surgery
  • "Control" patients have no previous episode of prosthetic dislocation with more than 2 year since initial intervention
Exclusion Criteria
  • The subject is participating in a category 1 interventional study, or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study
  • The subject refuses to sign the consent
  • It is impossible to give the subject informed information
  • The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship
  • Patient is pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding
  • Patient with lumbar instrumentation
  • Patient with severe dementia (Mini Mental State Examination < 10)
  • Patient with American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥ 4
  • Patient experience multiple falls
  • Patient requiring early revision surgery (<15 days postoperatively
  • Patient with obvious implant positioning error on an X-ray of the pelvis.
  • Patient with dislocation of traumatic origin (significant kinetic trauma)

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Patients without prothesis instabilityEOS imagery-
Patients with previous prothesis instabilityEOS imagery-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Sacral slope between standing to sitting difference between groupsDay 0

Sacral slope between standing to sitting difference between groups

Rate of type 1 pelvic kinematic disorder between groupsDay 0

Measured by sacral slope difference from standing to seated position \< 12°.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Lumbar lordosis between standing and seating between groupsDay 0

degree

Lewinnek plane (Anterior pelvic plane) between standing and seating between groupsDay 0

degree

Classification of patients' pelvic kinematic disorder (Type 1 or 2)Day 0

Type 1 = Difference in sacral slope between standing and seated position \< 12° Type 2 = pelvic version \< 20° standing

Femoroacetabular flexion between standing and seating between groupsDay 0

degree

Pelvic version between standing and seating between groupsDay 0

degree

Classification of patients according to pelvic incidenceDay 0

Presence/absence

Classification of patients according to sagittal imbalanceDay 0

Presence/absence of: Sagittal Vertical Axis \> 50 mm; Spino-Sacral Angle \< 127°

Classification of patients according to sacral slopeDay 0

Presence/absence

Evolution of acetabular positioning (anteversion and inclination in degree) from standing to sittingDay 0

Degree

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

CHU Lapeyronie de Montpellier

🇫🇷

Montpellier, France

CHU Nimes

🇫🇷

Nîmes, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath