NCT03302520
Completed
N/A
Comparison of Fusion Rate and Clinical Results Between Bioactive Glass Ceramics Spacer With PEEK Cages in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial
ConditionsDegenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
- Sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Enrollment
- 54
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Fusion rates
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 4 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The authors aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of CaO-SiO2-P2O5-B2O3 glass ceramics with PEEK cage that is widely used for posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery in the clinical field.
Investigators
Jin S. Yeom
Professor
Seoul National University Hospital
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •patients aged between 30 and 80
- •patients who required one-level PLIF between L1 and S1 among those who required an extensive laminectomy or facetectomy to correct severe disc extrusion or severe spinal stenosis or those who required PLIF due to grade I or II spondylolisthesis
- •those who (only if a signature was obtainable), or whose legal guardian, fully understood the clinical trial details and signed the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
- •osteoporosis patients with average T-scores of L1-L4 at \<-3.0 in DEXA bone density tests
- •women with positive pregnancy tests before the trial or who planned to become pregnant within the following 3 years
- •patients with a history of malignant tumor or malignant diseases (but the cases of cured disease with no relapse for the past 5 years were included in the present study)
- •patients with abnormal blood potassium and phosphorus levels;
- •patients with liver disease, kidney disease, respiratory disease, metabolic disease, or psychological disease;
- •patients deemed to have less than 1-year life expectancy;
- •patients with mental retardation or whose parents or legal guardians were older or had mental disabilities;
- •other patients viewed as inappropriate by the staff
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Fusion rates
Time Frame: up to 5 year after operation
This is assessed by postoperative computed tomography at 1 year after surgery
Secondary Outcomes
- EQ-5D(3, 6, and 12, months, and every year, up to 5 year after operation)
- Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)(3, 6, and 12, months, and every year, up to 5 year after operation)
- Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0(every year, up to 5 year after operation)
- Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS)(3, 6, and 12, months, and every year, up to 5 year after operation)
- PainDETECT(3, 6, and 12, months, and every year, up to 5 year after operation)
- Fusion rates(every year, up to 5 year after operation)
Study Sites (1)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Recruiting
N/A
Survival and Success of Two Different Filling TechniquesPeriapical DiseasesBioceramic SealersSurvival RateHealing RateNCT06252337University of Bologna80
Unknown
N/A
Study of Bioactive Glass-ceramic Intervertebral Spacer (Bonglass-SS) in Posterior Lumbar Interbody FusionDegenerative Disk DiseaseNCT01439464BioAlpha Inc.86
Terminated
N/A
Emdogain and Straumann Bone Ceramic in Infrabony DefectsPeriodontitisNCT00906776Institut Straumann AG19
Not Yet Recruiting
N/A
Evaluation of Premixed Verses Powder/Liquid Bioceramic MTA in Indirect Pulp Capping.Indirect Pulp CappingNCT05597553Cairo University24
Completed
Phase 4
Comparison of Ceramic-on-Ceramic and Ceramic-on-Highly-Cross-Linked Polyethylene BearingsOsteonecrosisOsteoarthritisNCT01806766Ewha Womans University100