Methylphenidate (Ritalin) and Memory/Attention in Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Brain Injury
• Interventions: Other: Placebo as both treatments; Drug: Methylphenidate; Behavioral: Memory and Attention Training

• Registration Number: NCT00453921
• Lead Sponsor: Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Brief Summary

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant public health problem, with 1.5-2.0 million Americans injured each year. Cognitive deficits, particularly in the domains of memory and attention are frequently the source of lingering disability after TBI and a source of enormous distress to the injured individuals and their family/caregivers. To date, interventions to ameliorate chronic cognitive deficits have been directed at either pharmacological interventions or cognitive rehabilitation. We propose to (1) To compare the efficacy of three interventions: memory and attention training (MAAT), methylphenidate, and memory/attention training in combination with methylphenidate and (2) use functional MRI (fMRI) to characterize changes in activation of the neural circuitry of memory and attention due to MAAT alone, methylphenidate alone, and MAAT in combination with methylphenidate. This is a two by two design with medication (methylphenidate/placebo) and cognitive therapy (Memory and Attention Training (MAAT) or an Attention control intervention) as possible interventions. Using a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind design, 200 individuals with persistent cognitive deficits 6-12 months after MTBI will be randomized to receive a six week trial of either (1) MAAT and placebo, (2) MAAT and methylphenidate (0.3 mg/kg BID), (3) attention control intervention and methylphenidate (0.3 mg/kg BID), or (4) attention control intervention and placebo. Symptom distress, attention and memory performance, and activation patterns of the neural circuitry of attention and memory while undergoing fMRI will be characterized at baseline, and after the four treatment conditions. This study will provide important information on three interventions for the most disabling sequelae of an enormous public health problem. Further, it will help to clarify underlying neural mechanisms and suggest additional treatment possibilities.

Detailed Description

Summary and Gaps to be Addressed by the Proposed Study

What is known: There are two interventions of promising efficacy in ameliorating deficits in attention and memory after mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI): (i) memory and attention training/rehabilitation, and (ii) catecholaminergic augmentation (particularly with methylphenidate - which augments both dopaminergic and adrenergic systems). fMRI and other functional imaging strategies are providing valuable insights into the underlying neural mechanisms of the cognitive enhancing effects of methylphenidate in some neuropsychiatric populations (individuals with ADHD), and the effects of cognitive rehabilitation efforts in some domains (e.g. speech and language in individuals after stroke).

What is not known: To date there are no studies that apply a psychopharmacological strategy of augmenting neurotransmitter systems known to modulate memory/attention (dopaminergic and adrenergic systems) in combination with a cognitive rehabilitation intervention known to improve memory/attention (memory/attention training) in individuals with MTBI. We are aware of no published studies that use fMRI to assess the neural mechanisms of memory/attention improvement from the use of catecholaminergic agents or memory/attention training in individuals with MTBI. It is important to determine the efficacy of combined memory/attention training and methylphenidate. It is equally important to begin to understand the neural mechanisms underlying effective treatment as it may help to inform the development of the next generation of interventions and perhaps lead to individually tailored treatment interventions. This proposal will start to address these gaps in our knowledge.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2007-02
• Study First Submitted: 2007-03-27
• Study First Submitted QC: 2007-03-28
• Study First Posted: 2007-03-29
• Primary Completion: 2013-05
• Study Completion: 2013-05
• Results First Submitted: 2018-03-14
• Results First Submitted QC: 2018-05-04
• Status Verified: 2018-06
• Results First Posted: 2018-06-07
• Last Update Submitted: 2018-06-11
• Last Update Posted: 2018-06-13

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 76

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age: Individuals aged 18-65 who sustained a mild to severe TBI 4 months prior to study entry.
2. TBI: Subjects must sustain a traumatic blow to the head, resulting in either alteration of level of consciousness (manifested by being dazed and confused or having amnesia for the event) or loss of consciousness (LOC). Duration of LOC will be estimated by using all available information including patient and witness reports, emergency personnel records and Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center (DHMC) medical records. Post traumatic amnesia (PTA) will be estimated by careful questioning of patients to determine the time of return of continuous memory. This will be informed by review of medical records. We plan to include individuals with intracranial or skull injuries stemming from the TBI, providing they meet the inclusion criteria. Such lesions will be catalogued, and included as a factor in the data analysis.
3. Cognitive Deficits: Subjects will have either subjective and objective evidence of persistent cognitive deficits. Subjects must report persistent memory or attention deficits as a result of their injury, which are of sufficient severity to interfere with social and/or occupational functioning. Subjects must either score more than 2 standard deviations below the age adjusted norm or estimates of baseline premorbid function on one or more tests of attention and/or memory administered as part of the baseline screening cognitive battery (see below), or score greater than 1.0 standard deviations below either age adjusted norms or estimates of premorbid function on 2 or more of the screening tests.

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

The following factors will exclude otherwise eligible subjects from participation:

1. a history of other neurologic disorders (such as epilepsy, cerebrovascular disease, mental retardation, neurodegenerative disorders)
2. significant systemic medical illness such as clinically significant liver disease, renal disease, atherosclerotic coronary vascular disease, or hypertension requiring medication management
3. current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) Axis I diagnosis of psychiatric illness other than substance abuse. We have given careful consideration to the inclusion of the latter group given our use of a stimulant with potential abuse properties. Because of the potential for cross-over abuse with cocaine, amphetamines, and other stimulants, individuals with such histories will be excluded from this study. Individuals with history of otherwise uncomplicated ethanol or other non-stimulant drug abuse currently in stable remission will be eligible. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (MINI) will be used to screen for psychiatric illness
4. women currently pregnant or lactating. Female participants will be asked to take a pregnancy test to confirm they are not currently pregnant.

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: FACTORIAL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
1	Placebo as both treatments	Placebo Capsule and Placebo Memory and Attention Training (Placebo as both conditions)
2	Memory and Attention Training	Methylphenidate capsules and Memory and Attention Training (Active Med/Active therapy)
4	Memory and Attention Training	Placebo capsules and Memory and Attention Training (Placebo Med/Active therapy)
2	Methylphenidate	Methylphenidate capsules and Memory and Attention Training (Active Med/Active therapy)
3	Methylphenidate	Methylphenidate capsules and Placebo Memory and Attention Training (Active Med/Placebo therapy)

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change in Anterior Cingulate Gyrus Activation During Working Memory Processing (3-back > 0-back Condition) From Baseline to Post-intervention	pre- to post-intervention (at least 7 weeks)	Change from pre- to post-treatment in brain activation in the anterior cingulate region of interest in arbitrary units provided by the SPM (statistical parametric mapping) program (range: unknown). Higher scores indicate greater increase in activation from pre- to post-treatment.
Change in Right Inferior Frontal Activation During Working Memory Processing (3-back > 0-back Condition) From Baseline to Post-intervention	pre- to post-treatment (at least 7 weeks)	Change from pre- to post-treatment in brain activation in the right inferior frontal region of interest in arbitrary units provided by the SPM (statistical parametric mapping) program (range: unknown). Higher scores indicate greater increase in activation from pre- to post-treatment.
Neuropsychological Assessment, CVLT-II	post-intervention (at least 7 weeks)	Memory measure: California Verbal Learning Test, 2nd edition (CVLT), Total, trials 1-5 (range: 0-80). Higher scores are better outcome.
Neuropsychological Assessment - CPT, Distractibility Condition (Reaction Time)	post-intervention (at least 7 weeks)	Continuous Performance Test, Distractibility Condition (Reaction Time in msecs) (range: 0-800). Higher score is worse performance.
Functional MRI Task Performance and Brain Activation (Change From Baseline to Post-treatment)	pre- to post-6 week treatment intervention (at least 7 weeks)	Change in performance (percent correct,adjusted for guessing) from pre-(baseline) to post-treatment (approximately 7 weeks) for in-scanner n-back working memory task (Range: 0-100). Higher scores means better performance.
Change in Left Middle/Inferior Frontal Activation During Working Memory Processing (3-back > 0-back Condition) From Baseline to Post-intervention	pre- to post-treatment (at least 7 weeks)	Change from pre- to post-treatment in brain activation in the left middle/inferior frontal region of interest in arbitrary units provided by the SPM (statistical parametric mapping) program (range: unknown). Higher scores indicate greater increase in activation from pre- to post-treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Self Report Questionnaire - MASQ	post-intervention (at least 7 weeks)	The Multiple Abilities Questionnaire (self rating) is a questionnaire in which participants can identify deficits/complaints in the areas of language, visual perception, verbal memory, visual memory and attention and concentration. A total score is calculated; range is 30-130. Higher scores indicate greater level of complaints (worse outcome). For the purposes of this study, a score one standard deviation above the mean (102.7) indicated significant reported cognitive complaints.

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

University of Colorado at Denver; 🇺🇸 Denver, Colorado, United States

Indiana University; 🇺🇸 Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; 🇺🇸 Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States